Quantcast

Jump to content


Photo

New Merge.


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
54 replies to this topic

Poll: For or againgst the new merge? (39 member(s) have cast votes)

For or againgst the new merge?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Vote

#1 Dan

Dan
  • Resident Know-It-All

  • 6382 posts


Users Awards

Posted 16 September 2004 - 08:43 AM

Personally, I am againgst the new merge, but what are your views on it...I mean, I wont force my thoughts upon others. :)

#2 XenoCyde

XenoCyde
  • 4223 posts

Posted 16 September 2004 - 08:44 AM

shud be a dotn care opt. :)

#3 Robert

Robert
  • 6934 posts


Users Awards

Posted 16 September 2004 - 08:46 AM

I am strongly against because they are/some of them are cri'minals using STOLEN credit card to pay for there hosting is a big no and do not want to mix with them :) I am even willing to leave  :closedeyes:

#4 Dan

Dan
  • Resident Know-It-All

  • 6382 posts


Users Awards

Posted 16 September 2004 - 09:01 AM

I'm sure Mystical will admit to it.

#5 Fatal

Fatal
  • 3625 posts


Users Awards

Posted 16 September 2004 - 09:02 AM

yaaa I DONT :angry2: want the merge, NOOOOOOOO I hate this merge,  were having a convo on msn about it with alot of active mems

#6 Dan

Dan
  • Resident Know-It-All

  • 6382 posts


Users Awards

Posted 16 September 2004 - 09:05 AM

The three new admins, no way. Codex is classified as a "big" site..We dont need to be merging with fraud merchants and forums with three members.

#7 Dan

Dan
  • Resident Know-It-All

  • 6382 posts


Users Awards

Posted 16 September 2004 - 09:07 AM

We do? I surely didnt know that.

#8 Fatal

Fatal
  • 3625 posts


Users Awards

Posted 16 September 2004 - 09:07 AM

nah we dont need more admins

#9 Chloe

Chloe
  • 328 posts

Posted 16 September 2004 - 09:09 AM

Ive never heard about this credit card fraud thing till now......this makes me a little weary, maybe it should be looked into more before the merge and if it is found out that this is going on I would be against it.....right now codex has a good clean name and if we merged with someone who held themselves to that kinda of standard we would be putting our good name in jeapordy and taking a major step back.......I guess right now I'm unsure cause I was unaware of this credit card info

#10 Robert

Robert
  • 6934 posts


Users Awards

Posted 16 September 2004 - 09:14 AM

1 active SMod, H.Elf has disappeared and quite a few Mods who've disappeared of the face of the earth and all the ti'me Codex is growing...

View Post


there are plenty of codex members who would love the job, just ask them, we don't need to I'mport from another site <_<

#11 Chloe

Chloe
  • 328 posts

Posted 16 September 2004 - 09:19 AM

I really dont think we should merge with a whole nother site just for the admins......like wjmroberst said, theyres a lot of codex members here who wouldnt mind being an admin and shouldnt they get first dibbs on job openings here then ppl from another site?

#12 Chloe

Chloe
  • 328 posts

Posted 16 September 2004 - 09:24 AM

I don't know, I didnt think we were having a prob now, I like the way it is, we have lots of members but its not crazy busy....this isnt my site and I doubt hydro would do this if he didnt think it was a good thing but I dont really think we need to...

#13 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 16 September 2004 - 09:30 AM

I accidently clicked againts. Ahh well, it's not like this poll will matter anyway.

#14 Chloe

Chloe
  • 328 posts

Posted 16 September 2004 - 09:32 AM

yeah I agree that the poll wont be a big deal with the final decision but it def gets our thoughts out there which is I'mportant

#15 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 16 September 2004 - 09:34 AM

It means I clicked the againts box and submitted silly girl <_<

#16 XenoCyde

XenoCyde
  • 4223 posts

Posted 16 September 2004 - 09:38 AM

silly admins they shudda made a poll before they merged with NeoFreaks to see who wanted them or not :lol:

Tho it would suck if they alredy deletde their site <_<

#17 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 16 September 2004 - 09:40 AM

I meant to click For.

#18 dash

dash
  • 294 posts

Posted 16 September 2004 - 09:43 AM

Against. Mainly because codex is going to turn into something they arent.

Wheeooooo

#19 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 16 September 2004 - 09:48 AM

I can't see the cons of this really, just a few annoying prats moaning really.

#20 Hanneh

Hanneh
  • 1152 posts

Posted 16 September 2004 - 09:48 AM

Ok I'm kinda against this....They don't sound the best of people, thus ruining neocodex's rep. Plus on the staff issue why don't you just promote current members? The staff on neofreaks(?) haven't done anything great with codex nor have they worked their way to being staff on codex. Big fat NO. I think there alot of suitable people for staff positions here already.

Edited by Hanneh, 16 September 2004 - 09:53 AM.


#21 Jaf

Jaf
  • 1654 posts

Posted 16 September 2004 - 10:09 AM

I'm not sure. The up side is of course more people meaning more activity on the site. But we never know what kind of people may come out of it

Unsure

#22 Fatal

Fatal
  • 3625 posts


Users Awards

Posted 16 September 2004 - 10:22 AM

yaa I know a few ppl admins have said are suietable for mods etc. but like I said b4 , codex is kinda like a monarchy type voting, then again itz kinda not, soo I don't know I say NO, they can go find sum1 else, like my site, hahaha

#23 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 16 September 2004 - 10:25 AM

You can all vote for me next ti'me -wink wink nudge nudge- <_< kidding

#24 Guest_Freaky_*

Guest_Freaky_*

Posted 16 September 2004 - 11:00 AM

Basing your opinions on anything but fact is not clever. I am not the owner of Neodoom. I think that the outcome will have to depend on the members here, after all, what is a forum without members?

Edited by Freaky, 16 September 2004 - 11:01 AM.


#25 Hanneh

Hanneh
  • 1152 posts

Posted 16 September 2004 - 11:12 AM

We have members here, whether you have members is nothing to do with codex really.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users