A public poll!
#26
Posted 07 May 2011 - 03:58 AM
Someone's been busy
#27
Posted 07 May 2011 - 08:39 PM
#28
Posted 07 May 2011 - 11:05 PM
#29
Posted 07 May 2011 - 11:09 PM
#30
Posted 07 May 2011 - 11:32 PM
Just because they voted no doesn't they actually like you.At least 13 people have some form of courteous relations with how i am.
I voted no, but because just outright banning you for stupidity instead of for something more serious is a bit childish, instead you should just get your keyboard taken away for a while.
#31
Posted 07 May 2011 - 11:38 PM
Just because they voted no doesn't they actually like you.
I voted no, but because just outright banning you for stupidity instead of for something more serious is a bit childish, instead you should just get your keyboard taken away for a while.
"you should just get your keyboard taken away for a while" ---- Wont change much.
#32
Posted 07 May 2011 - 11:40 PM
What normal people would make out of that statement was for the staff to just shut you up for a while."you should just get your keyboard taken away for a while" ---- Wont change much.
#33
Posted 07 May 2011 - 11:42 PM
What normal people would make out of that statement was for the staff to just shut you up for a while.
Won't change much
#34
Posted 07 May 2011 - 11:47 PM
Just hate how perfectly good threads get trolled on by himself and eventually revolve around him; For example, Scot's most recent thread.
I respect him as a graphics designer, but I don't respect him for his personal characteristics.
Hence my vote; sways towards the Yes end.
#35
Posted 08 May 2011 - 12:02 AM
#36
Posted 08 May 2011 - 12:04 AM
Meh, i really wouldn't have a problem with it It wont change anythingi think limiting the number of post he can post per day to 1 is worse then death for him.
#37
Posted 08 May 2011 - 12:18 AM
Edited by Strategist, 08 May 2011 - 12:22 AM.
#38
Posted 08 May 2011 - 12:44 AM
I was pretty neutral at the start. I didn't know what all the fuss was about, but after reading the link Toxic-Snipe gave, along with his other posts here, I voted yes.
#39
Posted 08 May 2011 - 12:54 AM
He is literally the first person I've ever "ignored" in my 6 years at neocodex, after that post he madeOf course you dont care NOW, you dumb shit. Youve got your 500 posts...... Why would you care any more whether we have to put up with your spam or not. GTFO already. I voted
no due to the fact you havent done anything 'ban-worthy'fuck it i changed my vote...... I'm getting fucking fed up personally with having to read all your bullshit comments throughout threads these days..... If you havent got anything worth while to contribute to the forum, DONT.
#40
Posted 08 May 2011 - 01:01 AM
Of course you dont care NOW, you dumb shit. Youve got your 500 posts...... Why would you care any more whether we have to put up with your spam or not. GTFO already. I voted
no due to the fact you havent done anything 'ban-worthy'fuck it i changed my vote...... I'm getting fucking fed up personally with having to read all your bullshit comments throughout threads these days..... If you havent got anything worth while to contribute to the forum, DONT.
Amen, White Brother
#41
Posted 08 May 2011 - 01:02 AM
He is literally the first person I've ever "ignored" in my 6 years at neocodex, after that post he made
I feel like i'm special now, and i don't use abrosia so why would i care to have 500 posts?
#42
Posted 08 May 2011 - 01:10 AM
#43
Posted 08 May 2011 - 01:11 AM
You know, the one good thing about Maha is how he brings people together and make them work for a better future. You have my "yes" and I hope you'll get banned!
lol, You do realize that i barely have to do anything to annoy people, and to be honest banning me wont keep me away
#44
Posted 08 May 2011 - 02:31 AM
Honestly, I think banning him is really harsh. People have done worse shit, and the worse he can do is annoy the shit out of you.
He hasn't scammed, nor taken anything away from you. I have been scammed before, and honestly, if feels much more shittier than this. There are way more people who deserved to be banned.
But honestly Maha, try to be less aggravating. Your seriously pissing some people off xD I don't really care, since I'm annoying and like to aggravate people irl.
#45
Posted 08 May 2011 - 02:52 AM
and to be honest banning me wont keep me away
I know moderators at some sites that would take that as a challenge.
#46
Posted 08 May 2011 - 03:03 AM
I think everyone thought like me(or had a similar opinion) I think at the beginning(Silence not ban him), then Maha pretty much screwed himself over.
Honestly, sure he's being an annoying little shit.
But thats it.
I know moderators at some sites that would take that as a challenge.
Edited by without123, 08 May 2011 - 03:03 AM.
#47
Posted 08 May 2011 - 04:00 AM
EDIT: spoke too soon... guess it was only a warning...
Edited by iomega, 08 May 2011 - 04:03 AM.
#48
Posted 08 May 2011 - 07:18 AM
I don't see how you guys think this kind of topic is appropriate in any way. If Maha is acting this way, it's only because you guys are giving him too much attention. Besides, it's not your call and he will be banned only if he's violating forum rules.
#49
Posted 08 May 2011 - 07:24 AM
My fault for letting this topic go on. Thanks SL for fixing that up. I was seeing some mature people voting No with a mature reason. After that it just assed up.
#50
Posted 08 May 2011 - 11:05 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users