132 replies to this topic

[iomega]

Sweeney, on 19 May 2011 - 03:35 PM, said:

Would you say that my first post in this thread was high quality?

High quality? No.
But I've read the whole thread, I agree with it AND it made me giggle a bit.
If you needed the rep, i'd would've +rep'd you for it.

Sweeney, on 19 May 2011 - 03:41 PM, said:

Or... we could rep them to get rid of them?

If people want to exploit that loophole then i cant stop them

[ShadowLink64]

Elindoril, on 19 May 2011 - 03:40 PM, said:

Loose enough that it's not a good way to use it for Advancement, I've gotten rep points for telling people to fuck off pretty much, and more or less I didn't even deserve the rep, but I got it anyways.

That's why it's not a good idea to use reputation points in any calculation. If anything, only negative rep should be used to obliterate posts.

Sweeney, on 19 May 2011 - 03:41 PM, said:

Or... we could rep them to get rid of them?

Indeed.

[Ali]

ShadowLink64, on 19 May 2011 - 04:11 PM, said:

That's why it's not a good idea to use reputation points in any calculation. If anything, only negative rep should be used to obliterate posts.

Were we not looking at a way of burying posts? Did I imagine that?

[ShadowLink64]

Ali, on 19 May 2011 - 04:12 PM, said:

Were we not looking at a way of burying posts? Did I imagine that?

No, you didn't imagine it. We just haven't implemented it yet, and we're kind of waiting until the "new" version of the site comes out to do that. Hydro and Pyro are working on it, sorta.

Posts also disappeared because things went a little off-topic. In case you were wondering.

[Boggart]

I thought argue locked this thread o.o

i like iomega's idea of posts and/or rep, except that a lot of people rep for trading, which wouldn't be allowed bla bla bla more rules *kaboom*

[Ali]

ShadowLink64, on 19 May 2011 - 04:13 PM, said:

No, you didn't imagine it. We just haven't implemented it yet, and we're kind of waiting until the "new" version of the site comes out to do that. Hydro and Pyro are working on it, sorta.

Oh good, that will make things better. Thing you just did hasn't worked by the way, shows up in my settings but hasn't applied to the board.

Boggart, on 19 May 2011 - 04:14 PM, said:

i like iomega's idea of posts and/or rep, except that a lot of people rep for trading, which wouldn't be allowed bla bla bla more rules *kaboom*

And I would rep every single post I saw in the hope that it would stop illiterate idiots from continuing?

[ShadowLink64]

Ali, on 19 May 2011 - 04:16 PM, said:

Oh good, that will make things better. Thing you just did hasn't worked by the way, shows up in my settings but hasn't applied to the board.


And I would rep every single post I saw in the hope that it would stop illiterate idiots from continuing?

I'll see what's going on. Just keep the complaining to PM because I'm having to remove all the off-topic stuff from the topic.

EDIT: Cut it out guys.

[ShadowLink64]

Alright, maybe argue was right. Closed, I grow tired of invisibilizing every post being made in here because it's off-topic.