Negative Rep
#1
Posted 19 May 2011 - 06:04 AM
#2
Posted 19 May 2011 - 06:11 AM
#3
Posted 19 May 2011 - 06:12 AM
Because rep is entirely pointless in every single form.
agree, + rep!
#4
Posted 19 May 2011 - 06:12 AM
#5
Posted 19 May 2011 - 06:12 AM
personally though, im all for the idea. sometimes words fail, and we need a button to press in case of extreme disgust.
#6
Posted 19 May 2011 - 06:16 AM
#7
Posted 19 May 2011 - 06:17 AM
If you dislike a post then just ignore it.
#8
Posted 19 May 2011 - 06:18 AM
#9
Posted 19 May 2011 - 06:21 AM
#10
Posted 19 May 2011 - 06:55 AM
#11
Posted 19 May 2011 - 07:01 AM
Though I suppose it might be a worthwhile addition for those unable to muster such.
#12
Posted 19 May 2011 - 07:43 AM
#13
Posted 19 May 2011 - 07:49 AM
However, we have the system, and if we can reward members we should be able to penalize them with this worthless number as well.
#14
Posted 19 May 2011 - 07:49 AM
if you have negative rep, whats to prevent a mass organization by forum members to gather together and negative rep every single post by an unliked person (which would appear to be me atm), whether the post is good or not, since apparently many are not concerned with post quality but with other reasons instead like why they are even posting to begin with.
-rep
#15
Posted 19 May 2011 - 07:53 AM
-rep
See you just proved my point, people will -rep for no reason at all, can you tell me in all honesty that your posts are of a better quality than mine when you posted something like that above. This is proof that people will -rep based upon bias and dislike rather than because of the actual content of an individuals post.
#16
Posted 19 May 2011 - 07:55 AM
#17
Posted 19 May 2011 - 07:55 AM
See you just proved my point, people will -rep for no reason at all, can you tell me in all honesty that your posts are of a better quality than mine when you posted something like that above. This is proof that people will -rep based upon bias and dislike rather than because of the actual content of an individuals post.
it was a joke. are you a child?
You don't care about the quality of this forum; you're one of the those who are making it becoming worse. So shut up already. Post to 500, then GTFO
#18
Posted 19 May 2011 - 08:43 AM
Because rep is entirely pointless in every single form.
Being pointless, why not have -rep and let the kids have fun?
if you have negative rep, whats to prevent a mass organization by forum members to gather together and negative rep every single post by an unliked person (which would appear to be me atm), whether the post is good or not, since apparently many are not concerned with post quality but with other reasons instead like why they are even posting to begin with.
Let's say people organize against one particular person, what difference would it make?
Rep would still be worth shit...
#19
Posted 19 May 2011 - 12:33 PM
#20
Posted 19 May 2011 - 12:40 PM
if you have negative rep, whats to prevent a mass organization by forum members to gather together and negative rep every single post by an unliked person (which would appear to be me atm), whether the post is good or not, since apparently many are not concerned with post quality but with other reasons instead like why they are even posting to begin with.
You can "become a victim" of "a mass organization by forum members" with or without a -rep button.
#21
Posted 19 May 2011 - 01:23 PM
anywho, the -rep button would be abused on certain users I assume.
#22
Posted 19 May 2011 - 01:25 PM
Maybe they'd take the hint, at last?anywho, the -rep button would be abused on certain users I assume.
#23
Posted 19 May 2011 - 01:27 PM
I wouldn't say abused.... I suspect the -rep would be used in just the right amount on these people. They'd finally take the hint, like Joe just said.I'm sure people would whine over getting negatively rep'd as some beg to get positively rep'd.
anywho, the -rep button would be abused on certain users I assume.
#24
Posted 19 May 2011 - 02:04 PM
#25
Posted 19 May 2011 - 02:07 PM
The goal could be to have the lowest negative number then! The concept still applies, regardless if everyone is in the red or not. It would just be a bit more depressing is all, lol.I think that eventually everyone except for Waser would have negative rep eventually. Because most of the time you post more bad things then good. It would take away from the personality of this forum becuase everyone would be trying to avoid getting -repped.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users