79 replies to this topic

[Stunnerrunner]

I'm in shock. I honestly cannot believe they didn't find her guilty. What a cruel world to let someone get away with brutal murder.

I hope I'm not breaking any rules by posting this. If so, mods can remove. I'm just curious what others think about this if you were following the trial.

EDIT: Here is an article that explains in a nutshell what is going on. Hope I'm allowed to post outside links.

http://www.reuters.c...E7620Y720110705

Edited by Stunnerrunner, 05 July 2011 - 10:46 AM.

[Ladida]

Stunnerrunner, on 05 July 2011 - 10:24 AM, said:

I'm in shock. I honestly cannot believe they didn't find her guilty. What a cruel world to let someone get away with brutal murder.

I hope I'm not breaking any rules by posting this. If so, mods can remove. I'm just curious what others think about this if you were following the trial.

WHAT THE FUCK?!?!?! *runs to news* I can't believe this.. WHAT?!?

[Stunnerrunner]

Ladida, on 05 July 2011 - 10:26 AM, said:

WHAT THE FUCK?!?!?! *runs to news* I can't believe this.. WHAT?!?

I know. What a screwed up jury...

[Random]

inb4trolls

[Ladida]

So.. Uh.. They all seem happy and all.. But then.. Who killed Caylee??

[Kats]

I'm honestly very surprised she wasn't at least charged with manslaughter...


DIS SEEMS FEESHY TO ME

[Stunnerrunner]

Ladida, on 05 July 2011 - 10:28 AM, said:

So.. Uh.. They all seem happy and all.. But then.. Who killed Caylee??

I still believe it was her. But she sets a new standard for murders... If you keep your mouth shut, they can't pin anything on you. Pisses me off.

[Leah]

Honestly, I wasn't expecting her to be found guilty of the murder, (I think she did it, but there really wasn't any concrete evidence) but she got away with the child abuse charge! How did that happen?!

Edited by Leah, 05 July 2011 - 10:36 AM.

[policepro]

This is crazy...
It does seem weird since it seemed clear that she was going to be guilty(quick verdict).

[Stunnerrunner]

policepro, on 05 July 2011 - 10:36 AM, said:

This is crazy...
It does seem weird since it seemed clear that she was going to be guilty(quick verdict).

That's what my parents said. A quick verdict is never a good thing. I guess for her it was.

[Waser Lave]

What's this about? You might want to provide some background information for those of us that have no clue.

[Adam]

I blame the crack 'science' used as evidence in this case. That crazy bitch did it..

[Cory]

Anyone remember JonBenét Ramsey? Everyone in the world KNEW it was the dad or brother. Get over it so that the real killer can be found.

[Sage]

Well, at least they found her guilty of lying to cops, because she definitely did that. It'll be really damn funny if she gets off this whole thing with just that, but then gets slapped with a humongous settlement for defamation of character from that nanny who was not actually a nanny.

Edited by cuddlydemon, 05 July 2011 - 10:49 AM.

[Stunnerrunner]

This reminds me of the O. J. Simpson case... Lots of similarities between the two trials.

[policepro]

So her own parents thought she was guilty, but the jury didn't?

Edited by policepro, 05 July 2011 - 10:56 AM.

[Sage]

policepro, on 05 July 2011 - 10:54 AM, said:

So her own parents thought she was guilty, but the jury wasn't?

Parents can never be trusted in a case where their child is either the victim or the suspect. Period.

[Chalk]

American justice system is really screwed up.

[policepro]

cuddlydemon, on 05 July 2011 - 10:55 AM, said:

Parents can never be trusted in a case where their child is either the victim or the suspect. Period.

Yeah, but don't the parents almost always say "my kid would never do that"? When they heard the verdict they left right away. I find that weird
I want to hear what the jury will say.

[Stunnerrunner]

cuddlydemon, on 05 July 2011 - 10:55 AM, said:

Parents can never be trusted in a case where their child is either the victim or the suspect. Period.

100% Agreed. I feel they shouldn't have been allowed to be called to the stand. All that crap Cindy came up with made me feel like puking, but you gotta love her clever comebacks.

"I'm a nurse but I still needed to Google whether chlorofo... oops I mean chlorophyll... Damn." - Of course I'm paraphrasing. But seriously, some of the things she said made absolutely no sense whatsoever.

Edited by Stunnerrunner, 05 July 2011 - 11:02 AM.

[Sage]

policepro, on 05 July 2011 - 10:58 AM, said:

Yeah, but don't the parents almost always say "my kid would never do that"? When they heard the verdict they left right away. I find that weird
I want to hear what the jury will say.

Every convicted murderer had parents at some point. Of the ones who were alive and asked, how many of those parents do you think also said "my kid would never"? It doesn't mean anything. It's just the parent stating something they think is probably true, or something they think could buy their kid some time if they really think the kid might have actually done it, or whatever. There are a million reasons to say "my kid would never do that," and "because I actually believe that to be true" is only one of them.

As for them walking out on hearing the verdict? Yeah, if my daughter knew I'd decided she killed a child and buried the remains in the woods, and she was found not guilty and thus not going to jail, I'd be high-tailing it out of the courtroom too, at the very least because I wouldn't know WHAT the hell to say to her.

Edited by cuddlydemon, 05 July 2011 - 11:05 AM.

[policepro]

cuddlydemon, on 05 July 2011 - 11:03 AM, said:

Every convicted murderer had parents at some point. Of the ones who were alive and asked, how many of those parents do you think also said "my kid would never"? It doesn't mean anything. It's just the parent stating something they think is probably true, or something they think could buy their kid some time if they really think the kid might have actually done it, or whatever. There are a million reasons to say "my kid would never do that," and "because I actually believe that to be true" is only one of them.

As for them walking out on hearing the verdict? Yeah, if my daughter knew I'd decided she killed a child and buried the remains in the woods, and she was found not guilty and thus not going to jail, I'd be high-tailing it out of the courtroom too, at the very least because I wouldn't know WHAT the hell to say to her.

I wouldn't expect them to say something to casey, but nothing to anyone? Do you think they never thought once that it was a possible that she could be found innocent?

[Sage]

policepro, on 05 July 2011 - 11:11 AM, said:

I wouldn't expect them to say something to casey, but nothing to anyone? Do you think they never thought once that it was a possible that she could be found innocent?

Why does that even matter? They're not investigators and they're not lawyers. In all likelihood they wanted to get out fast and avoid the press.

[Microscope]

Holy shit. I really thought she was guilty, and I still think that.

[policepro]

cuddlydemon, on 05 July 2011 - 11:17 AM, said:

Why does that even matter? They're not investigators and they're not lawyers. In all likelihood they wanted to get out fast and avoid the press.

I would think it would be better for them to say something. Then again the jury/judge aren't talking to the media either.