Sexual Orientation
#26
Posted 11 July 2011 - 03:36 PM
#27
Posted 11 July 2011 - 04:00 PM
Wow, almost every girl here is bisexual x)
Yeah, me too, but the difference is that my preference doesn't depend on whether I previously consumed alcohol or not =P
See the drunk thing is why I went voted heterosexual (unless you ever meet my parents, in which case I am super ultra straight always. ...also I'm a virgin )
Maybe girls are more open to experimenting? If I had to guess, I'd say probably the fact that girl on girl is (generally) considered more of a turn on by more people than guy on guy, so there's somehow less stigma? At least that's been my experience.
#28
Posted 11 July 2011 - 05:18 PM
See the drunk thing is why I went voted heterosexual (unless you ever meet my parents, in which case I am super ultra straight always. ...also I'm a virgin )
Maybe girls are more open to experimenting? If I had to guess, I'd say probably the fact that girl on girl is (generally) considered more of a turn on by more people than guy on guy, so there's somehow less stigma? At least that's been my experience.
Maybe we're just more affectionate. Many men I know are really proud of their "masculinity" and consider their preferences to determine if the are real men or not... so if these guys I know meet a gay boy, they will automatically pick on him for not being "man enough". That's stupid, really.
And, at least, for me, being with a girl is just like, "bah, life's short, I don't care... guy or chick, I like them both". Although I've been experimenting more with girls lately x)
#29
Posted 11 July 2011 - 06:20 PM
#30
Posted 11 July 2011 - 08:40 PM
Why is this little guy on your window lock?
Spoiler
I live on the 13th floor You better move him on my door lock
#31
Posted 11 July 2011 - 09:53 PM
This, a million times this.I am asexual.
#32
Posted 11 July 2011 - 09:55 PM
I am asexual.
This, a million times this.
Concurred. I much prefer food over any form intimacy
#33
Posted 12 July 2011 - 04:10 AM
Maybe we're just more affectionate. Many men I know are really proud of their "masculinity" and consider their preferences to determine if the are real men or not... so if these guys I know meet a gay boy, they will automatically pick on him for not being "man enough". That's stupid, really.
And, at least, for me, being with a girl is just like, "bah, life's short, I don't care... guy or chick, I like them both". Although I've been experimenting more with girls lately x)
Well technically females cannot have lesbian sex which is why it is probably not hyped up. There is no penetration, fingers withstanding.
#34
Posted 12 July 2011 - 05:52 AM
I am asexual.
Just because you can't get any does not mean you're asexual.
#35
Posted 12 July 2011 - 07:43 AM
On another note, someone once told me that apparently girls are more likely to be "in the middle" of a sexuality spectrum (i.e. maybe a little attracted to girls here and there), but guys are more likely to be rather polarised (i.e. fully straight or fully gay). Whether this is true or not, I'm dubious, but there you are.
======
I've stopped trying to classify my sexuality after too many years of irrational guilt and beating myself up and confusion and etc etc. I hate the term lesbian because of its connotations, but realistically I realise that it would take one amazing bloke for me to be interested in him. Besides... I'm in a long-term relationship with a wonderful girl, so it kind of makes the point moot.
....... actually I take it back I'm 2D-sexual. YEEEEEAH.
Edited by Tanuki, 12 July 2011 - 07:45 AM.
#36
Posted 12 July 2011 - 07:48 AM
On another note, someone once told me that apparently girls are more likely to be "in the middle" of a sexuality spectrum (i.e. maybe a little attracted to girls here and there), but guys are more likely to be rather polarised (i.e. fully straight or fully gay). Whether this is true or not, I'm dubious, but there you are.
That's more of a soceital thing than a genetic thing though; especially with gender roles being set into children at the age of about 2-3, men generally are more close-headed to the idea of "experimentation".
#37
Posted 12 July 2011 - 08:00 AM
#38
Posted 12 July 2011 - 08:37 AM
Well technically females cannot have lesbian sex which is why it is probably not hyped up. There is no penetration, fingers withstanding.
We can't technically engage in coition, but that doesn't mean we can't have "sex" per se ;D
Edited by IceSandwich, 12 July 2011 - 09:31 AM.
#39
Posted 12 July 2011 - 08:38 AM
We can't technically can't engage in coition, but that doesn't mean we can't have "sex" per se ;D
Just use dildobular devices.
#40
Posted 12 July 2011 - 08:55 AM
Dude, if your idea of sex = stickin' it in, and that's it... I feel sorry for you. Or more specifically I feel sorry for your partner.
#41
Posted 12 July 2011 - 11:04 AM
Whoa I somehow missed the comment that there's no such thing as lesbian sex?
Dude, if your idea of sex = stickin' it in, and that's it... I feel sorry for you. Or more specifically I feel sorry for your partner.
It's not my idea, it's what makes sense. Using toys and fingers don't actually count. 'Lesbians' who use dildos are really just substituting for a penis, so take your go at that.
#42
Posted 12 July 2011 - 12:16 PM
#43
Posted 12 July 2011 - 12:32 PM
It's not my idea, it's what makes sense. Using toys and fingers don't actually count. 'Lesbians' who use dildos are really just substituting for a penis, so take your go at that.
Ever heard of tribbing?
Edited by IceSandwich, 12 July 2011 - 12:34 PM.
#44
Posted 12 July 2011 - 12:46 PM
Ever heard of tribbing?
Scissor me timbers!
#45
Posted 12 July 2011 - 03:20 PM
Just because you can't get any does not mean you're asexual.
WAT. NO YOU DIDN'T.
Ever heard of tribbing?
Not until today. Good gracious me!
#46
Posted 12 July 2011 - 03:28 PM
Ever heard of tribbing?
I thought that was more of a fantasy, I didn't think it actual worked. (Or at least worked to make an orgasm).
Also prbm is actually asexual, here's a pic:
#47
Posted 12 July 2011 - 07:45 PM
I thought that was more of a fantasy, I didn't think it actual worked. (Or at least worked to make an orgasm).
Haven't tested it yet, but heard it does work, lol.
I'll be asexual for the next couple of weeks for my own safety.
#48
Posted 12 July 2011 - 07:54 PM
To me, this is not true. D: Sadly enough, I really do think girls are hot, and find them more much eye pleasing, and I'd be much more willing to 'do things' with them. But I don't get emotionally attached to them. At all. While guys on the other hand, the few that I like enough, I really do get strongly attached to, very much in love. I'm not normally 'attracted' to male body parts, but they are the exception. I basically fall head over heels in love with them. But not girls.It's, y'know, actually being attracted to the other gender, like legitimately willing to get down 'n' dirty with them. Or better yet, in a relationship with them. If you "think" you might be bisexual, try imagining actually being in a relationship or having sex with someone of the same gender. If you aren't totally okay with that, you're probably not. </irritating pet peeve>
It's really hard to explain. I could be full blown out homosexual. It depends on how you look at it, whether we're just talking sexual attraction or emotional attraction. In the end, I think I'd rather be with a male, simply because I'll probably be happier. =/
#49
Posted 12 July 2011 - 08:03 PM
Well now I'm sad.Just because you can't get any does not mean you're asexual.
That sadness has now passed.
#50
Posted 12 July 2011 - 09:59 PM
To me, this is not true. D: Sadly enough, I really do think girls are hot, and find them more much eye pleasing, and I'd be much more willing to 'do things' with them. But I don't get emotionally attached to them. At all. While guys on the other hand, the few that I like enough, I really do get strongly attached to, very much in love. I'm not normally 'attracted' to male body parts, but they are the exception. I basically fall head over heels in love with them. But not girls.
It's really hard to explain. I could be full blown out homosexual. It depends on how you look at it, whether we're just talking sexual attraction or emotional attraction. In the end, I think I'd rather be with a male, simply because I'll probably be happier. =/
No, I totally get you. But that's different to what I'm talking about. I'm talking about people who say they're bi because they'll mack a chick after a few shots, but would never go for them normally or ever be in a serious relationship with them. There are an increasing number of people like this and it kind of annoys me.
I can empathise though. Guys don't really do it for me physically, but I could fall in love with one (and have before). Girls are hot, but most girls annoy the living shit out of me. It's just a matter of finding the right person. You might find a guy that you like physically, or you might find a girl who you can get attached to. Trying to define whether you're one way or the other for the purposes of a label is pretty pointless in this regard.
I thought that was more of a fantasy, I didn't think it actual worked. (Or at least worked to make an orgasm).
Haven't tested it yet, but heard it does work, lol.
I, er... y'know... heard from a friend of a friend... *cough*... that it doesn't really work as well as porn likes to pretend. It's just kind of awkward to get in a position that works for both sides.
Doesn't really matter if it doesn't result in an orgasm though. Sex is (or should be) about a little more than just a straight away track to getting off. Have fun along the way and enjoy being that close to someone you love... maybe? Or am I the weird one here. :|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users