It's so time for me to catch some sleep. Fin!
No errors so far. Currently on page 14 of the SDB. I think you can finally call it a night
Posted 30 September 2011 - 04:42 AM
Posted 30 September 2011 - 04:43 AM
Edited by iomega, 30 September 2011 - 04:45 AM.
Posted 30 September 2011 - 04:45 AM
Posted 30 September 2011 - 06:17 AM
Posted 30 September 2011 - 06:39 AM
Well i think i found my problem..... i didnt have a copy of python.exe installed
Getting a new copy now and will see what happens.
Posted 30 September 2011 - 06:39 AM
Posted 30 September 2011 - 06:48 AM
no luck once again. It looks like it tries to run but then comes up with this:
I downloaded the latest release above too. Meh im off to bed, if someone can help that'd be great
Posted 30 September 2011 - 06:51 AM
Posted 30 September 2011 - 07:02 AM
now its saying the same thing but where it says line 19 in the screenie, it is now line 24
Posted 30 September 2011 - 07:05 AM
Posted 30 September 2011 - 07:08 AM
lol i can download an older version of python if need be ill try that one now. 2 secs
Posted 30 September 2011 - 07:08 AM
Posted 30 September 2011 - 07:19 AM
Posted 30 September 2011 - 07:22 AM
Y'know, it's really no wonder that Python 3 is having trouble gaining wide adoption. Thankfully, there's a 2to3 tool that I hope successfully converted the old code to Python 3 code that should work for you. *fingers fucking crossed*
Posted 30 September 2011 - 07:24 AM
Posted 30 September 2011 - 07:25 AM
We're still using 2.7 I think, Python 3 seems to include some strange changes.
Posted 30 September 2011 - 07:25 AM
Posted 30 September 2011 - 07:27 AM
Most of them seem to be performance enhancements, which makes sense as Python catches a lot of flak for being comparatively slow. Still, breaking print and sort was really mean. 2to3 seems to work for most cases, which'll certainly help make the transition easier.
Posted 30 September 2011 - 07:33 AM
well..... some success with the login but then THIS:
blanked out UN and PW for obvious reasons, but i DID enter them correctly
People who are creating something which needs to run things quickly wouldn't pick Python anyway, that would be a pretty silly choice of language.
Edited by Inkheart, 30 September 2011 - 07:33 AM.
Posted 30 September 2011 - 07:35 AM
Posted 30 September 2011 - 07:39 AM
I... huh? Evil. You guys are secretly running auto-buyers written in C, aren't you?
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:10 AM
Autobuyers don't need to run really quickly (hence why we need to actually slow them down to avoid getting frozen), if you're doing something where you need to process lots of data, for example, hardly anybody would pick Python to do that.
Edited by Inkheart, 30 September 2011 - 10:10 AM.
Posted 30 September 2011 - 02:11 PM
Posted 30 September 2011 - 02:16 PM
I can't get past running "ls".
BTW I'm completely new to command prompt and don't know anything about it.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users