I repeat, this topic is endorsed, and the winner guaranteed the position. Vote wisely.
Edited by workofartificial, 01 May 2012 - 08:09 PM.
Posted 01 May 2012 - 07:49 PM
Edited by workofartificial, 01 May 2012 - 08:09 PM.
Posted 01 May 2012 - 07:53 PM
By who?I repeat, this topic is endorsed,
Posted 01 May 2012 - 07:53 PM
Posted 01 May 2012 - 07:54 PM
I won't reveal my sources. You'd be wise to believe me though, I'm a trustworthy sort of guy.By who?
There are only 2 logical choices on that list. 1 who will probably refuse the position, and the other who doesn't have any/enough experience in being a moderator/administrator.
Posted 01 May 2012 - 07:55 PM
However, the powerbrokers of the website are on the hunt for a new administrator
Posted 01 May 2012 - 07:56 PM
Edited by ch33psh33p, 01 May 2012 - 08:00 PM.
Posted 01 May 2012 - 07:57 PM
Posted 01 May 2012 - 07:58 PM
Refusal is not an option.
Posted 01 May 2012 - 07:58 PM
Edited by Neoquest, 01 May 2012 - 08:00 PM.
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:00 PM
Now you are speaking my changuage
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:01 PM
Most of those people have absolutely no qualifications or experience with Administrating. Even the reasonable choices probably wouldn't want the job.
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:01 PM
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:01 PM
No, he picked popular people or those who would spark a reaction.Are you sure these people have all agreed to possibly being able to help manage a website? It doesn't seem like the simplest and easiest thing to do, and a lot of people are too busy to do so o.o
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:02 PM
Are you sure these people have all agreed to possibly being able to help manage a website? It doesn't seem like the simplest and easiest thing to do, and a lot of people are too busy to do so o.o
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:02 PM
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:03 PM
And you know because you know everyone's entire history on the internet?
Edited by Neoquest, 01 May 2012 - 08:04 PM.
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:04 PM
No, he picked popular people or those who would spark a reaction.
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:05 PM
The hidden twist: the person with the fewest votes will be permanently demoted to Contributer status.
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:06 PM
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:06 PM
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:07 PM
You realize this thread means nothing, right? Did you honestly believe this is how we'd choose the next Administrator?Take my name off that list. I'm already Admin for one site, we don't even have that many people and I'm still working seemingly non-stop. I don't have time to be admin here too, not to mention most of you don't like me so there would be tons of needless pointless drama involved.
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:07 PM
Its okay, I vote Turnip.
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:07 PM
Take my name off that list. I'm already Admin for one site, we don't even have that many people and I'm still working seemingly non-stop. I don't have time to be admin here too, not to mention most of you don't like me so there would be tons of needless pointless drama involved.
Refusal is not an option.
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:07 PM
I snorted. I don't lol anymore.The hidden twist: the person with the fewest votes will be permanently demoted to Contributer status.
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:10 PM
I've been around this site for a year now and have decided for myself who would make a good admin and who wouldn't. As for qualifications, I was referring mostly to programming.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users