Quantcast

Jump to content


Photo

Housewives can't be feminists.


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
93 replies to this topic

#1 8143FF763271

8143FF763271
  • 468 posts

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:19 PM

That'd make as much sense as an abolitionist slave owner.

#2 Sweeney

Sweeney
  • 1230 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:22 PM

Define housewife.
Define feminist.

#3 Waser Lave

Waser Lave

  • 25516 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:22 PM

What about lesbian housewives?

#4 Rainie

Rainie
  • 854 posts

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:23 PM

That's great to know.

#5 PuzzleWarrior

PuzzleWarrior
  • 32 posts

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:24 PM

You talk about stepford housewives?

#6 MysteryMunch

MysteryMunch
  • 53 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:30 PM

LOL... no. Just no.

#7 Waser Lave

Waser Lave

  • 25516 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:32 PM

He didn't do a very good job with this one.

#8 Mishatu

Mishatu
  • 346 posts

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:32 PM

I disagree with your definitions.

#9 Sweeney

Sweeney
  • 1230 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:35 PM

Especially since penis owners can also be feminists.

#10 Waser Lave

Waser Lave

  • 25516 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:36 PM

Especially since penis owners can also be feminists.


Gay.

#11 Drakonid

Drakonid
  • 804 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:37 PM

Penis owning feminists have no backbone.

#12 8143FF763271

8143FF763271
  • 468 posts

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:38 PM

Housewife is someone that does mainly menial tasks at home while being financially supported by her husband.

Feminist is someone that rejects the gender based conventions and restriction of patriarchal society.

I guess he wasn't getting anywhere with trying to out debate someone with a penis, so he figured he'd try to irritate the women here.



Good luck, you're going to need it.


That's pretty sexist.

#13 Waser Lave

Waser Lave

  • 25516 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:40 PM

Housewife is someone that does mainly menial tasks at home while being financially supported by her husband.


Why do they need a husband?

#14 Sweeney

Sweeney
  • 1230 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:40 PM

So why can't a woman choose to reject the gender-based conventions and restrictions of patriarchal society, and also enjoy being a housewife?

#15 Josh

Josh
  • 318 posts

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:41 PM

Your wrong.

#16 8143FF763271

8143FF763271
  • 468 posts

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:41 PM

So why can't a woman choose to reject the gender-based conventions and restrictions of patriarchal society, and also enjoy being a housewife?


Because she's perpetuating those very conventions and restrictions through her life choices.

#17 Waser Lave

Waser Lave

  • 25516 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:41 PM

*Awaits the long-winded ridiculous argument which will continue until everybody else gets bored*

Edit: It has begun.

Because she's perpetuating those very conventions and restrictions through her life choices.


You seem to have missed my questions out.

#18 8143FF763271

8143FF763271
  • 468 posts

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:43 PM

The entirety of patriarchal society is based around the concept of a housewife. There's something intrinsically flawed between saying you're a feminist and accepting what patriarchy is, in essence, all about.

*Awaits the long-winded ridiculous argument which will continue until everybody else gets bored*

Edit: It has begun.



You seem to have missed my questions out.


laffs :thumbsup:

#19 Sweeney

Sweeney
  • 1230 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:44 PM

Because she's perpetuating those very conventions and restrictions through her life choices.


Not if they're her fully informed choices. Which they are, in this hypothetical example.

So you're wrong.

#20 Drakonid

Drakonid
  • 804 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:45 PM

Are you actually going to give up being a douchebag, or do we have to suffer your bullshit until you get bored?

You achieve absolutely nothing with this, you're better off just ignoring him.

#21 Waser Lave

Waser Lave

  • 25516 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:47 PM

You achieve absolutely nothing with this, you're better off just ignoring him.


Done.

Posts by idiots here have become as regular as prune juice-obsessed irritable bowel syndrome sufferers.

#22 Drakonid

Drakonid
  • 804 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:49 PM

Done.

Using the ignore feature is not the same as actually ignoring someone.

#23 Waser Lave

Waser Lave

  • 25516 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:51 PM

Using the ignore feature is not the same as actually ignoring someone.


I bet kami could prove you wrong in fewer than 5000 individual posts.

#24 8143FF763271

8143FF763271
  • 468 posts

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:54 PM

Not if they're her fully informed choices. Which they are, in this hypothetical example.

So you're wrong.


When you're a feminist, you're making a political stance. Not an individual one. Being a slave owner may be a fully informed choice that you benefit fully from, but don't pretend that you will be considered an ally of the abolitionist cause when you actively benefit from it and accept it in your life. You may like being a housewife and you may choose to do it, but it doesn't change what the institution of the housewife is, the conventions its based on, and the power dynamic that it perpetuates.

The gender expectations we have on women, their beauty standards, their sexual restrictions, our perception of their skills and abilities- they're all based on one thing, and it's the role of the house wife. Everything in patriarchal society can be traced back to the construction of the monogamous stay-at-home wife. Y'all can't call yourself feminists and play along with patriarchy at the same damn time.

#25 Drakonid

Drakonid
  • 804 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 August 2012 - 03:55 PM

Betting on yourself?


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users