Posted 21 January 2016 - 11:59 AM
That is just asking for spam. Why would anyone want that?
(and we already have the award for the 100 posts day anyway)
Ahh that's a really good point 
Would be sort of redundant.
I almost said I was gonna check for you, but then I remembered... x)
Locked and hidden threads probably wouldn't qualify anyway.
submissive
Posted 22 January 2016 - 03:20 AM
Title: Popular Thread Creator
Goal: Create a thread that gets over 100 replies.
i like this idea. 
i haven't made a massively popular thread in a while and this will definitely encourage me to research some interesting topics to share in neocodex.
submit an award for it, man.
Sad sack.
Posted 22 January 2016 - 04:30 AM
i like this idea.
submit an award for it, man.
When I get time I'll have to make one.
haha
Posted 28 January 2016 - 08:43 AM
What about an Award for the people with the most awards? Like a top 10 or 25 or something?
Posted 28 January 2016 - 08:45 AM
What about an Award for the people with the most awards? Like a top 10 or 25 or something?
we have that already
haha
Posted 28 January 2016 - 09:00 AM
we have that already
Where 
!?!?!
Ohh!!! No no no no no.. Like I mean an award for the number 1, 2, 3 or top 10 people with the most awards o:
retired cheater
Posted 28 January 2016 - 09:06 AM
Where
Above Average Mediocrity
Posted 28 January 2016 - 09:16 AM
That is just asking for spam. Why would anyone want that?
(and we already have the award for the 100 posts day anyway)
(Regards to making a thread that's popular with 100 posts)
Yes, I want that award and the new mods can deal with the spam, so why not?
The only thing stopping me from saying 100% yes is that there was another award that's similar (but not exactly) to this, but it shouldn't matter.
cougar slut
Posted 28 January 2016 - 09:17 AM
People love redundant redundancy.
Wonder Woman
Posted 28 January 2016 - 09:19 AM
(Regards to making a thread that's popular with 100 posts)
Yes, I want that award and the new mods can deal with the spam, so why not?
The only thing stopping me from saying 100% yes is that there was another award that's similar (but not exactly) to this, but it shouldn't matter.
Well, popular threads have the "hot" thing next to them, so it could be a fire award for people with more than 100 replies or even 10+ pages.
Always drunk 坂本
Posted 28 January 2016 - 09:22 AM
Well, popular threads have the "hot" thing next to them, so it could be a fire award for people with more than 100 replies or even 10+ pages.
could be a star with fire (i can work in that award, have something in mind)
Wonder Woman
Posted 28 January 2016 - 09:23 AM
could be a star with fire (i can work in that award, have something in mind)
Don't start yet We still have to discuss it because staff's a bit iffy.
cougar slut
Posted 28 January 2016 - 09:24 AM
Well, popular threads have the "hot" thing next to them, so it could be a fire award for people with more than 100 replies or even 10+ pages.
But, what if the person that made the thread (and get the award) had only made the OP?
Technically, you'd be giving an award to someone when others did the "hard" work.
Posted 28 January 2016 - 09:24 AM
heh if it's a "flame" would remind me of tinder
Wonder Woman
Posted 28 January 2016 - 09:25 AM
But, what if the person that made the thread (and get the award) had only made the OP?
Technically, you'd be giving an award to someone when others did the "hard" work.
But it was your idea in the first place The conversation wouldn't be there if you hadn't created it.
haha
Posted 28 January 2016 - 09:26 AM
Flame and star for OP, and small flame for thread participants?
Always drunk 坂本
Posted 28 January 2016 - 09:26 AM
Don't start yet
Dont worrry im bored and want to do something, if staff aproves a new award, i will suggest mine
But, what if the person that made the thread (and get the award) had only made the OP?
Technically, you'd be giving an award to someone when others did the "hard" work.
If the thread gets 100 replies, that means the person that made the thread did a nice job, creating something good to discuss
Wonder Woman
Posted 28 January 2016 - 09:29 AM
Flame and star for OP, and small flame for thread participants?
I would just stick to one. Counting and awarding all of the participants of every thread would be too difficult.
cougar slut
Posted 28 January 2016 - 09:30 AM
But it was your idea in the first place
Hm. It makes sense. I guess xD
Flame and star for OP, and small flame for thread participants?
Jesus. Can you imagine go through ALL +4 pages threads and see who's eligible for a participants award??
Wonder Woman
Posted 28 January 2016 - 09:35 AM
Kate and I have discussed it. Thanks for the suggestion @Melancholy
The requirements would be 10+ pages (without spam) in any post increasing area. Non-post increasing areas will not count, and they are listed in the FAQ. 10+ pages makes it a little more of a challenge and it's a bit easier for staff to check.
Above Average Mediocrity
Posted 28 January 2016 - 09:51 AM
But, what if the person that made the thread (and get the award) had only made the OP?
Technically, you'd be giving an award to someone when others did the "hard" work.
But if original poster was able to make dispassionate lurkers and people of the like involved to actually posting with only the OP, then that is an achievement in and of itself.
Reckless Cheater
Posted 28 January 2016 - 10:05 AM
An award for solving any of @Kelvin 's puzzles. Now that's an achievement! 
Wonder Woman
Posted 28 January 2016 - 10:56 AM
I'm so glad I hosted the AC and the AC (heh)
Those would count, right @Emily?
Edit: if not, could it count at least the threads made after January 1st 2016 *dog eyes*?
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Community Forum Software by IP.Board 3.4.8
Licensed to: Neocodex
