13 replies to this topic

[Strategist]

http://www.pcgamer.c...urrent-classes/

So, looks like Blizzard are going to make people pay to unlock the new 'alternate' Heroes. Thoughts?

For me, I say now that I probably won't spend the money to do so, but I know I'll more than likely cave in eventually (depending on exactly what you get/how much it is).

[NapisaurusRex]

Kind of expensive for aesthetics.

[Elindoril]

Kind of expensive for aesthetics.

Sounds like the perfect cash shop to me.

[Kat]

Wonder if he will have a new hero ability? It would be a pretty big deal if that's the case.

 

nvm i read the article

 

dumb

 

This is why I can't play hearthstone anymore, just a cash grab. They could be making new cards or adding the death knight/monk classes, but noooo

Edited by Kat, 04 June 2015 - 01:47 PM.

[Strategist]

Yeah I would much prefer to see new classes come into the game as opposed to 'new' alternative heroes I reckon.

[Strategist]

They could be making new cards or adding the death knight/monk classes, but noooo

[Alexiel]

Wouldn't be surprised if any new heroes were held back until the next expansion.

And it's not necessarily the creation of alternate heros/skins necessarily detracts/halts development of new cards/heroes anyways.

If people want to buy this junk then let them.

Heaven help a business do things to make profit. 

At least as long as it stays just aesthetics. 

 

For me personally though?
Eh... there's probably at least one character I'd seriously consider paying for once. 
No idea who, but surely at least the one.

Naturally a mage and only a mage character otherwise not interested.

[badpotato32]

id pay for a new priest since i play it the most

[Dazz]

Why pay when you can have it for free?

 

[meista]

I've already spent $50 on Hearthstone boosters :X 

[Shane]

This new hero is just BS. Another way to suck money from people with no change to the game besides an image.