56 replies to this topic

[Swar]

I personally would never do it, I don't even drink.

 

I think it should be legal for medical purposes, as it's not really addicting (unless you smoke a lot, and I mean A LOT) and its components have some great uses. I'm on the fence about recreational use - only because I also don't like how you can smoke cigarettes anywhere that's open. If you want to smoke, sure, just don't make me smoke it too. Not a fan of cancer.

 

If there were like, special places for doing it, I'm all for it.

[Swar]

I'm against public use as well.

Along with public drinking and smoking (Cigarettes)

I'm not really against public drinking because it can't directly affect other people, but I wouldn't care at all if it were not allowed

[Swar]

Eh, disagree. people get murdered because of public intoxication quite often. Though that's another topic for another time

Oh, I see your point. See, it's indirect, because public drinking doesn't necessarily mean that the person will get drunk to the point of being dangerous, while by smoking, other people inhale the smoke. But it's better to be safe that sorry.

[Dont]

You see I totally get the second hand smoke thing. Also if you think about it, plant residue from smoking is plant residue (with both cigs and weed). I personally think medical patients should smoke extracts instead of actual flower for those reasons. Well made extract is SO much healthier to smoke than bud, let alone vaping, eating it, etc. But with weed compared to cigs, weed actually benefits people. From people with cancer to people with a.d.h.d. Cigs are just completely useless.

 

But on a different note, smoking weed and drinking shouldn't really be compared. It makes for an annoying debate. haha