The invitation modification
#76
Posted 30 November 2004 - 08:39 PM
#77 Guest_HellsAdvocate_*
Posted 01 December 2004 - 03:13 PM
#78
Posted 01 December 2004 - 03:19 PM
Dro don't say your filtering out noobs . Like holy crap I'm a newbI understand, but in that case I would ask that steven find a different venue to make money as we are trying to filter out all noobs by having an invite system and selling invites totally defeats the effort.
#79
Posted 01 December 2004 - 03:43 PM
Sorry but there has to be some sort of way for invites to be li'mited. Otherwise, its so easy to just bring anyone in here. The invites will remain at giving based upon the activity of the account as a non active account, given invites right away could instantly invite someone we dont want on the forum. I am still looking into whether or not I should do it by rank as I dont want to take the ability to invite from members. . Ill figure something out.Some of us would like to invite friends to this forum but dont totally have the ti'me to be super active and get 200 osts, like me. I'm well respected on a number of sites, though with school I don't have the ti'me right now to be super active and make lots of posts, so just make sure its fair to everyone.
#80
Posted 01 December 2004 - 07:43 PM
#81
Posted 01 December 2004 - 08:40 PM
I was umm joking seriouslly :blink: I know I couldn't seel codex invites thou that would be extremly nice if I couldBecause a neocodex invite is not something you make money off of. That totally defeats the purpose of having an invite mod. I'm not writing this for your personal gain, steven. If you dont stop selling the invitations, I will make sure that invites are disabled on your account.
yes your right Sl64 I do need food wanna donate 30 bucks to the Feed the Steven cause? I'll pay you back. (is not joking)I don't blame hi'm Hydro. (well, maybe a little for the invite thing) but Steven needs food.
When you have asshole roommates like he has.. you would want some cash for food.
#82
Posted 01 December 2004 - 11:48 PM
I think codex should stay locked up as it is, for safety reasons
we've had past leekers, and for all we know we might still have a few, if someone gets their hands on them stuff could go into the wrong hands
it's kind of a huge risk here
erm, you know how we have private?.. perhaps we could have the people we want to "invite" give us a little bit of info on them, perhaps to know more instead of just letting them in?
#83
Posted 01 December 2004 - 11:52 PM
#84
Posted 01 December 2004 - 11:52 PM
#85 Guest_HellsAdvocate_*
Posted 02 December 2004 - 06:44 AM
I am not asking for them instantly I can be a little more active but I cant spend all my ti'me here trying to get 200 or more posts just for one invite, I mean I want to be active and invite a firend or two but I cant do that. I hope its based on something fair like a number of posts to mkae per each invite and something about ti'me spent online so it is somewhat fair, thanx.Sorry but there has to be some sort of way for invites to be li'mited. Otherwise, its so easy to just bring anyone in here. The invites will remain at giving based upon the activity of the account as a non active account, given invites right away could instantly invite someone we dont want on the forum. I am still looking into whether or not I should do it by rank as I dont want to take the ability to invite from members. . Ill figure something out.
#86
Posted 21 December 2004 - 01:19 PM
#87
Posted 21 December 2004 - 01:32 PM
Thats unfair as no one seems to want me in private I've been on here ages.
#88
Posted 21 December 2004 - 01:38 PM
#89
Posted 21 December 2004 - 01:54 PM
#90
Posted 21 December 2004 - 02:01 PM
#91
Posted 22 December 2004 - 04:21 PM
#92
Posted 01 May 2005 - 04:46 PM
#93
Posted 01 May 2005 - 04:54 PM
#94
Posted 01 May 2005 - 04:56 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users