I feel the same about digi, but you sont need to ban them all, as long as they follow the rules, theyre okay.* thinks *
* is about to say: " CENSORED digibliss!!! " *
* thinks *
* says nothing *
Digibliss-NeoCodex Relations Policy
#26
Posted 17 May 2004 - 08:32 AM
#27
Posted 17 May 2004 - 08:35 AM
But it really isnt that si'mple... because they are Digibliss and we are NeoCodex! We dont have to do what they do! That is why we are not them! Does that make sence? I don't know. Anyways their admins are the type of people that wouldnt want to give us the pleasure of banning them, so I doubt they would come here and make their presence known anyways. So I guess there is no need for this disbecausesion.They did not welcome us, we do not welcome the admins. As si'mple as that.
I personally dont think that we should ban _anyone_... including digibliss assmans.. err.. admins unless they break the rules. I mean.. technicly the digibliss admins already did break the rules... but not while they were members of our board. So.. I'm not sure if the rules are clear on that.
And as far as banning members of digibliss... that is nuts! We are the place their members will want to escape to when they get fed up with digibliss! We should WANT them to join!
And I would like to just point out that this type of disbecausesion goes on among the admins all the ti'me. Wether you guys see it or not we are always trying to keep NeoCodex NeoCodex and make it better .
#28
Posted 17 May 2004 - 08:54 AM
#29
Posted 17 May 2004 - 08:58 AM
They shouldn't have joined digi in the first place - their lossAnd as far as banning members of digibliss... that is nuts! We are the place their members will want to escape to when they get fed up with digibliss! We should WANT them to join!
#30
Posted 17 May 2004 - 09:19 AM
#31
Posted 17 May 2004 - 09:33 AM
(offtopic) This is breaking rule #1 and WILL NOT BE TOLERATED! (not that breaking OTHER rules will be tolerated either!)Stop being biast and idiotic Sloth.
#32
Posted 17 May 2004 - 09:35 AM
#33
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:04 AM
#34
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:11 AM
#35
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:16 AM
#36
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:17 AM
Not really. Thy should keep their business inside their CENSORED board if they are from there, and so should we...Yeah, like AUS said if you start banning their members you'll start to become the same restrictive community that you so despise about them.
#37
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:23 AM
I agree with that frizzle because some of the members of digibliss are good people and all that matters is that they follow the rule and contribute to this big communityIt's a fact Sloth. You ARE being Biast which I think is extremly mean and stupid to banned (or exisitng) members of Digibliss. If they follow the rules, and are good people why can't we allow them here? Alot of members (me included) are fomer digibliss members who came to this site when banned or realised it was crap.
#38
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:27 AM
#39
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:35 AM
I dont agree of you being biast I agree that we shouldnt just banned them if some of the members of digibliss can follow rules here if they want to joinWhat, you agree that I'm biased?
#40
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:36 AM
Just look at frizzle... great example of whole digiblissI dont agree of you being biast I agree that we shouldnt just banned them if some of the members of digibliss can follow rules here if they want to joinWhat, you agree that I'm biased?
#41
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:39 AM
But after seeing what Frizzle's been saying to Sloth on MSN I'm 100% behind Sloth on this one. I can't disclose the messages but they're in the staff board to sort things out, but they were rude and racist to say the least (towards Sloth).
Edited by Typhoon, 17 May 2004 - 10:50 AM.
#42
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:42 AM
But guys.. how can you rip it out of digi if some of our own members can't be civil?
Frizz, Sloth, kiss and make up.
Edited by Valensin, 17 May 2004 - 10:46 AM.
#43
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:48 AM
Nah... actually I was about to admit that I AM nazi and I AM biased, but I'm not letting that affect my decisions (as a smod) in any way..I do think you can be a bit biased...DON'T start yelling at me because I can see your reasoning behind and I half agree with it.
And valensin, I'm not gay .
#44
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:51 AM
lmao. No! The messages were ai'med at Sloth and had nothing to do with what I said about their Eurovision entry, but they still beat us (I think)Anything to do with the Polish Transvestite in Eurovison? That was funny.
But guys.. how can you rip it out of digi if some of our own members can't be civil?
Frizz, Sloth, kiss and make up.
#45
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:52 AM
#46
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:53 AM
I'M NOT GAY!!!!!
Frizz, Sloth, kiss and make up.
#47
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:53 AM
#48
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:55 AM
What about those that DO break the rules?the final decision on this matter is that we will not be banning digi members coming here as long as they dont break our rules...
Edited by Dr. Sloth, 17 May 2004 - 10:59 AM.
#49
Posted 17 May 2004 - 10:56 AM
#50
Posted 17 May 2004 - 11:00 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users