Quantcast

Jump to content


Photo

Digibliss-NeoCodex Relations Policy


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
95 replies to this topic

#76 Hidden.Elf

Hidden.Elf
  • 1,797 posts

Posted 19 May 2004 - 02:46 PM

your comparisons are odd hydro lol... but itrue at the same ti'me... We should NOT ban anyone JUST because of their status with digibliss. We should just ignore that fact and judge them as a person, not steriotype them as some digibliss freak. There are lots of cool people on digibliss that have just been mind-wiped. And there are some un-cool people there aswell... I think both should be welcomed on codex as long as they abide our rules... They could change, you never know.

#77 ShadowLink64

ShadowLink64
  • 16,716 posts


Users Awards

Posted 19 May 2004 - 03:02 PM

I agree with Hydro 355%. We really need to surprise them............

I have seen personally how they underesti'mate us........... and they haven't done much of their homework....

#78 Hydrogen

Hydrogen
  • Neocodex Co-Founder

  • 22,213 posts


Users Awards

Posted 19 May 2004 - 04:40 PM

I agree with Hydro 355%. We really need to surprise them............

I have seen personally how they underesti'mate us........... and they haven't done much of their homework....

well then, I guess we found their weakness...the underesti'mation of enemies has been the worlds greatest generals' downfalls :(

#79 Freidmont

Freidmont
  • 448 posts

Posted 19 May 2004 - 04:58 PM

Of course, no need to overesti'mate either :(

#80 Dan

Dan
  • Resident Know-It-All

  • 6,321 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 May 2004 - 03:57 AM

At the beggining, I thought Digbliss' only rivals were Nhacks.

#81 Caim_Angelus012

Caim_Angelus012
  • 28 posts

Posted 20 May 2004 - 04:47 AM

At the beggining, I thought Digbliss' only rivals were Nhacks.

are they??? and I heard some one from zetacrack about their rivalry with digi

Edited by Caim_Angelus012, 20 May 2004 - 05:00 AM.


#82 Dan

Dan
  • Resident Know-It-All

  • 6,321 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 May 2004 - 07:25 AM

At the beggining, I thought Digbliss' only rivals were Nhacks.

are they??? and I heard some one from zetacrack about their rivalry with digi

Oh yeah. Nhacks hate Digi and Digi hate NHacks. Its one big triangle.

#83 Caim_Angelus012

Caim_Angelus012
  • 28 posts

Posted 20 May 2004 - 11:11 AM

At the beggining, I thought Digbliss' only rivals were Nhacks.

are they??? and I heard some one from zetacrack about their rivalry with digi

Oh yeah. Nhacks hate Digi and Digi hate NHacks. Its one big triangle.

Well thats why they suck!!....Why dont they just shut their mouths up!!
my friend was banned there because he asked neo_grl about the ncodex problem

#84 Guest_Ameron_*

Guest_Ameron_*

Posted 20 May 2004 - 03:26 PM

the best way to put things is that if a member is truly a "bad member" comming from digi, than they'de probably do somethign that would get them banned under your forums general rules anyways, therefore, they'de get banned, if they're a "good" member, then they'de abide by the rules and there'd be no point in banning them, I don't see what the huge problem is, lol

Well thats why they suck!!....Why dont they just shut their mouths up!!

maybe he got banned for saying something like that  =P  you never know =P

Edited by Ameron, 20 May 2004 - 03:27 PM.


#85 Hydrogen

Hydrogen
  • Neocodex Co-Founder

  • 22,213 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 May 2004 - 04:29 PM

I agree ameron...if they abide by our rules...I have no problem with it :(

#86 pyke

pyke
  • 13,672 posts


Users Awards

Posted 20 May 2004 - 05:12 PM

I say we should fobecause on the actions of people rather then where they belong to elsewhere. What is the point in feuding with all the other hack sites? The main fobecause should be just let whever say what they want in their own little posts. As long as Ncodex is succesful who cares what else other groups are doing. Besides we all know Ncodex is the best anyway so why bother stooping to insults, or threats? :(

#87 Guest_Ameron_*

Guest_Ameron_*

Posted 21 May 2004 - 01:10 PM

and remember, it's a frickin GAME, lol, thats' the main thing that boggle smy mind, all of this garbage is comming about over a GAME!!! and a pretty CRAPPY game at that!!!

#88 ShadowLink64

ShadowLink64
  • 16,716 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 May 2004 - 03:41 PM

No kidding. We are looking it at almost a political point of view..................  :blink:

#89 Guest_Ameron_*

Guest_Ameron_*

Posted 21 May 2004 - 06:09 PM

No kidding. We are looking it at almost a political point of view..................  :blink:

truly though, it's not who's gonna be the next president here, lol it's who's allowed in to talk about a game that is looked at by many as a kids game =P  it's like fighting over pogs or Pokemon or something =P

#90 BlackHawk

BlackHawk
  • 1,676 posts

Posted 21 May 2004 - 10:39 PM

and a pretty CRAPPY game at that!!!

I agree: NPets SUCK!!!!!!! :offtopic:

#91 ShadowLink64

ShadowLink64
  • 16,716 posts


Users Awards

Posted 24 June 2004 - 03:40 PM

Digibliss is seemingly becoming more sane now that neo_grl's gone. Everybody celebrate neo_grl's abdocation from admin @ digibliss!!

#92 Fatal

Fatal
  • 3,615 posts


Users Awards

Posted 24 June 2004 - 03:46 PM

WOOO HOO :)

#93 colgan102001

colgan102001
  • 40 posts

Posted 30 July 2004 - 06:22 AM

I think we should ban just the administrators

#94 colgan102001

colgan102001
  • 40 posts

Posted 30 July 2004 - 06:23 AM

The only jerk at digibliss is Digital...

Why should we punish them all if he is the only one?

and neo_grl

#95 colgan102001

colgan102001
  • 40 posts

Posted 30 July 2004 - 06:23 AM

truly though, it's not who's gonna be the next president here, lol it's who's allowed in to talk about a game that is looked at by many as a kids game =P  it's like fighting over pogs or Pokemon or something =P

ur right

#96 Ender

Ender
  • 4,321 posts

Posted 30 July 2004 - 06:28 AM

Please don't double/triple post or bring back dead topics.

Edited by Neo Wizkid, 30 July 2004 - 06:28 AM.



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users