Quantcast

Jump to content


Photo

Wtf Is That Supposed To Be?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
44 replies to this topic

#26 Guest_unused_*

Guest_unused_*

Posted 08 June 2004 - 02:20 AM

hehe I'm only human (well half on my mother milkmans side)

#27 BlackHawk

BlackHawk
  • 1676 posts

Posted 08 June 2004 - 05:23 AM

Well... I'm NOT going to enforce that rule, no way! ;) :lac:...

When I joined (half a year ago? :blink:), this place had only about 6 or 7 rules... (looking at the current rules it'd be #1, #2, #4, #5, #6 and #7)... this was ok... we could talk about everything (excluding warez and rude/disrespectful stuff)... now we're getting over-moderated -_- (not to mention the above issue...) :lac:

#28 Death

Death
  • 13 posts

Posted 08 June 2004 - 05:32 AM

What it's only stuff like sex and gore? Nothing they aint gonna see in a few years (talking about the dildo thing I just has a sex ed class where we had to put a condom on onne) I just dont want this site to be a digibliss site because that was crap and ths site seems cool

#29 BlackHawk

BlackHawk
  • 1676 posts

Posted 08 June 2004 - 05:48 AM

(talking about the dildo thing I just has a sex ed class where we had to put a condom on onne)l

Better save it for a higher purpose ;)

#30 Hydrogen

Hydrogen
  • Neocodex Co-Founder

  • 22213 posts


Users Awards

Posted 08 June 2004 - 05:55 AM

the rule came about from typhoon posting the picture of the nude lady next to the fat nude lady...this is what we are talking about. any type of material of this sort. when I opened that topic after krnsaber sent it to me...(by the way, I was on super fast dsl so there was no reading the topic before it loaded) my mom was next to me and so was my 11 year old brother...they both got a good look at that and I got in trouble. I wont stand for having that sort of s*** on the forum. if you want to see porn, ask sloth to send you to one of his huge penis sites... :p but it wont be coming on this board. And, yes, this is li'miting the freedom of speech...but you have to understand that this li'mitation is for the greater good...to protect the eyes of younger children so that they dont have to be succumbed to such I'mages. (also our host doesnt allow pornographic material ;) )

#31 Death

Death
  • 13 posts

Posted 08 June 2004 - 06:05 AM

I think we've all been there when we're lookin at pr0n and our mom or dad comes in lol

#32 BlackHawk

BlackHawk
  • 1676 posts

Posted 08 June 2004 - 06:12 AM

the rule came about from typhoon posting the picture of the nude lady next to the fat nude lady...this is what we are talking about. any type of material of this sort. when I opened that topic after krnsaber sent it to me...(by the way, I was on super fast dsl so there was no reading the topic before it loaded) my mom was next to me and so was my 11 year old brother...they both got a good look at that and I got in trouble. I wont stand for having that sort of s*** on the forum. if you want to see porn, ask sloth to send you to one of his huge penis sites... :p but it wont be coming on this board. And, yes, this is li'miting the freedom of speech...but you have to understand that this li'mitation is for the greater good...to protect the eyes of younger children so that they dont have to be succumbed to such I'mages. (also our host doesnt allow pornographic material :p )

ok, so maybe our host doesn't allow pr0n... but anything else is just plain restricting freedom of speech ;)


by the way:

I think we've all been there when we're lookin at pr0n and our mom or dad comes in lol

Nope... my laptop screen can be only viewed DIRECTLY from the front, AND I always sit with it in such a way that no one else could see the screen anyway :harhar: :harhar: :harhar:

#33 Kimoflea

Kimoflea
  • 5359 posts


Users Awards

Posted 08 June 2004 - 07:45 AM

Porn is very much a guy thing..  :blink:
Anyway, I agree with netbususer, none of that, but having loads of li'mitations on what we actually say does seem a bit too harsh.

#34 Dan

Dan
  • Resident Know-It-All

  • 6381 posts


Users Awards

Posted 08 June 2004 - 08:12 AM

Yeah. I agree with valensin. We should still be able to talk the way we want to.

#35 pyke

pyke
  • 13686 posts


Users Awards

Posted 08 June 2004 - 08:21 AM

Look people I know some of you don't like the new rule, but just think about this for a second. Most of you are taking this way out of context. Talkling about how we are turning into Digibliss.Most of you wouldn't be here just for saying that if that was the case. The one thing I don't like about this rule is that it is to vague. It is almot an opinion rule. I mean I could post something horrible, and meant for older people, and when this rule was brought up, I could say...well I think it is appropiate for 5 year olds!

#36 BlackHawk

BlackHawk
  • 1676 posts

Posted 08 June 2004 - 08:24 AM

Yeah. I agree with valensin. We should still be able to talk the way we want to.

Same here...
as I said, host rules are host rules :) , but restricting the freedom of speech is a totally different thing :happybday:

#37 freakymama

freakymama
  • 567 posts

Posted 08 June 2004 - 09:28 PM

HydroGen is Totally right! Guys email your porn to eachother!!! And about the language thing, weve all been doing it since we knew we could get away with it. My 5 year old came home from preschool the other day asking "mom, what does this middle finger mean"? I said "the F-word" he said "Sh*t" I said NOOO the bad one and I said it. I let hi'm try the finger thing once to get it out of his system, because I knew he'd be trying it every where being sneeky if I didn't. So ya know the language is everywhere, all kids hear it somewhere, so I feel thats not such a big deal.Most young kids can't read. But boy oh boy all kids pay attention to nakedness. My same boy was stairing at a nakid lady on a shavin box cover today for 10 minutes in the store...Yep, you guys do start early.

#38 113

113
  • 1190 posts

Posted 08 June 2004 - 09:44 PM

I somehow dont agree with all the context of the last rule. I mean we can live without pr0n (not totally sure about this ^_^ ). but at least a half of the jokes threads I posted were having a "bad language" or whatever,  so there werent for younger kids (just look at the wanted ad thread). but I dont think  I deserve to get banned for this. :p

#39 BlackHawk

BlackHawk
  • 1676 posts

Posted 08 June 2004 - 09:48 PM

mean we can live without pr0n

Doubt it :p

And this rule sucks!!! :ranting:

#40 Hydrogen

Hydrogen
  • Neocodex Co-Founder

  • 22213 posts


Users Awards

Posted 08 June 2004 - 09:49 PM

I somehow dont agree with all the context of the last rule. I mean we can live without pr0n (not totally sure about this :p ). but at least a half of the jokes threads I posted were having a "bad language" or whatever,  so there werent for younger kids (just look at the wanted ad thread). but I dont think  I deserve to get banned for this. ^_^

were not going to ban you  :p , you should know us better than that :p , but we are disbecausesing the rule currently...

however, if there is a great public outcry against this rule we might stricten it up to make it more specific because I do agree, it is a bit vague  :closedeyes:

#41 NP_craver

NP_craver
  • 501 posts

Posted 08 June 2004 - 10:39 PM

mean we can live without pr0n

Doubt it ^_^

And this rule sucks!!! :ranting:

hehe, not if u already hav what u crave :p :p

#42 memikeos

memikeos
  • 199 posts

Posted 09 June 2004 - 01:55 AM

...

And this rule sucks!!! :ranting:

Let me give you an example Sloth:

In YOUR house you may walk around buck-naked.
In MY house if you tried that you would get booted so fast your head would spin.

That doesn’t mean it’s wrong for you to do it in your house. It just means that there are appropriate places for things and this is not one of them.
We are not saying that you cannot use the occasional CENSORED, (we would ALL be at 80% warn), but explicit and graphical is where we are trying to draw the line.

I agree that with a rule like this you need to be precise with what is acceptable and what is not. No room for grey on this one.

Some people will be offended by this rule and say “free speech…” some would be offended if it’s not in place.

As a community we live by the rules because we choose to. If not there are other places to go where the rules are different.

#43 BlackHawk

BlackHawk
  • 1676 posts

Posted 09 June 2004 - 02:54 AM

It just means that there are appropriate places for things and this is not one of them.
We are not saying that you cannot use the occasional CENSORED, (we would ALL be at 80% warn), but explicit and graphical is where we are trying to draw the line.

I agree that with a rule like this you need to be precise with what is acceptable and what is not. No room for grey on this one.

Some people will be offended by this rule and say “free speech…” some would be offended if it’s not in place.

As a community we live by the rules because we choose to. If not there are other places to go where the rules are different.

I stand my case: no pr0n - ok (host issues :( ), but anything else is just li'miting the freedom of speech :)

And, my point is... we have too many restrictive rules. :)

*goes to digi to take a peek at the rules*
*can't find the rules at digi :( *
*doesn't even bother with NH*
...

#44 NP_craver

NP_craver
  • 501 posts

Posted 09 June 2004 - 03:30 AM

"what has been done, has been done, u cannot change the past" - some wise guy :)

#45 BlackHawk

BlackHawk
  • 1676 posts

Posted 09 June 2004 - 03:39 AM

"what has been done, has been done, u cannot change the past" - some wise guy :)

What are u trying to say by that? :blink:


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users