Explosive squibs can be seen before the collapse. http://llamaslap.com..._Demolition.swf (wait for it, it's towards the end).
There is something attached to the plane that hit the WTC. http://img97.imagesh...7/1152/d4hp.png
The building fell at freefall speed and shouldn't have. (See flash and previous posts)
The concrete is pulverized. (see flash)
Building 9 was demolished the same day, hours after, the towers collapsed. You can't set up a demolition that fast. Where did i get those facts, where can you fidn them? Look everywhere.
Find me a case where a full modern passenger plane full of fuel crashed full speed head on into a building. There isn't one. How do you or how does anyone else know this isn't what is supposed to happen when a gigantic fuel filled plane crashes head on into a building? No one does. They make guesses and claim them as fact. There's a reason simulations are done, and tests are run. Because number crunching and looking at completely unrelated things can't always tell you how it will happen.
How do they KNOW what speed the twin towers should have fallen at? How many gigantic towers have had their supports buckled by heat and fallen straight down? None. They're guessing.
It's all guesswork that people claim as fact. While ignoring all the obvious facts out there like oh... the passenger manifests and all the dead people on them. The phone calls out of the plane by civilians that are now, yes, dead.
And I'll say it again, if any of this was credible, more people would find it credible. The fact that rational society as a whole rejects it on the basis of its illogicality should be enough to clue someone in that it's not right. But I guess some people will continue with outlandish beliefs no matter how outlandish it gets...
That would really be like starting this topic all over again..
Not really... Because no one has pointed out many facts. It's basically people pointing out "random dude said this isn't how it's supposed to happen, so 9/11 is fake", and "hey, this is a big coincidence, 9/11 is fake". I'm not seeing a lot of facts here v_v Lots and lots of guesswork...