48 replies to this topic

[Inside Of You]

Just wondering what everyone is.

I have a theory that America is being more and more democrat (the younger generation).

I'm democrat.

[RandomNameIgnoreIt]

I tend to have authoritarian views but I lean towards democrat, when presented with those two choices.

[«Æ»]

im in the middle I like things both parties offer

[Hawk]

Im a strong Elephant Feels wierd saying that.

[Archon]

Actually, you are a hawk.

I am whatever feels right.

[Hawk]

Archon, on Jun 27 2006, 10:22 PM, said:

Actually, you are a hawk.

Touche

[Tetiel]

I'm an elephant because it's better than being an ass!! Buuuuuuuuurn!! </bad joke don't kill me!>

Nah, actually I'm more of a centrist but very morally right.

[Jotun]

On paper I'm a libertarian but I could go republican or democrat. It depends on the person.

[Cory]

I lean more towards the conservative republican side of politics. I have views from both sides though.

[Amagius]

Neither.

Originally, I was a staunch Democrat on most subjects, but now I can side with either side due to flaws in our political system that just ruin both sides. I agree with most democratic ideals, but the system is too warped to put appreciation into either for me.

[sonic]

Dear Red States ...

You elected the guy who let Osama get away.

Love,
The blue states

[Inside Of You]

Sonic, on Jun 27 2006, 11:45 PM, said:

Dear Red States ...

You elected the guy who let Osama get away.

Love,
The blue states

LOL.

Very nice.

G-Dub is such a freakin' money waster. He supported several cock fights with your tax money.

[sonic]

Inside Of You, on Jun 27 2006, 09:48 PM, said:

LOL.

Very nice.

G-Dub is such a freakin' money waster. He supported several cock fights with your tax money.

Lets not get too much into the conspiracys. I for one am Pro-war. God please dont let me get into it....lol

anyway I do not like bush though...

[Tetiel]

Sonic, on Jun 27 2006, 09:45 PM, said:

Dear Red States ...

You elected the guy who let Osama get away.

Love,
The blue states

Actually...

Dear Blue States...

You elected the guy who had Osama handed on a platter by Saudi Arabia but let him go even though he had already committed crimes against the US.

Love,
The red states

[Inside Of You]

The war was for WMDs... Did we find any??

NOOOOOO.

I really really really don't like G-dub...
Mainly for one issue but I won't get into it.

[sonic]

Inside Of You, on Jun 27 2006, 09:51 PM, said:

The war was for WMDs... Did we find any??

NOOOOOO.

I really really really don't like G-dub...
Mainly for one issue but I won't get into it.

Think about it. In 1988 Saddam killed 7000 kurds with chemical mustard gas. His own people he killed. If he EVER got ahold on WMDs should we wait for proof by him using them? Would you feel safe knowing he could kill thousands?

No. End of story.

[Cory]

Dear Blue States...

It is OK if you can not take a firm stand on any single issue. We will continue to be the voice of reason just so you can play the two faced good guy.

Love,
The red states

[sonic]

Marine, on Jun 27 2006, 08:54 PM, said:

Dear Blue States...

It is OK if you can not take a firm stand on any single issue. We will continue to be the voice of reason just so you can play the two faced good guy.

Love,
The red states

I like that........
Lol. I cant decide exactally were I stand niether........
Damn.
I wish i knew more........

Edited by Sonic, 27 June 2006 - 08:56 PM.

[Inside Of You]

If you use that argument, why is it that G-Dub refuses to fight North Korea when we have PROOF that they have WMDs?

We suspected Iraq and we know about NK...

HUH...

[Cory]

Inside Of You, on Jun 27 2006, 10:51 PM, said:

The war was for WMDs... Did we find any??

NOOOOOO.

I really really really don't like G-dub...
Mainly for one issue but I won't get into it.

Did they have weapons that they where not supposed to have? Yes. Saddam had SCUD missiles that he was not supposed to have. Which is more than enough of a reason to take him out. That is on top of the dozens of other illegal acts that him and his regime has committed.

Inside Of You, on Jun 27 2006, 10:55 PM, said:

If you use that argument, why is it that G-Dub refuses to fight North Korea when we have PROOF that they have WMDs?

We suspected Iraq and we know about NK...

HUH...

Because we are unable to get enough support after Iraq. To many people are bitching about one thing or another. Plus we are not sure exactly what North Korea has as far as other weapons and want to make sure we can avoid a nuclear war before we start something. There is also a little country called China that may fight on the side of North Korea if a war does start.

[sonic]

Marine, on Jun 27 2006, 08:55 PM, said:

Did they have weapons that they where not supposed to have? Yes. Saddam had SCUD missiles that he was not supposed to have. Which is more than enough of a reason to take him out. That is on top of the dozens of other illegal acts that him and his regime has committed.

The smartest thing I have heard in awhile.....
Yes, SCUD missles that broke, no shattered the UNs policy on long range weapons.

To tell you the truth, this is better.

Dear United Nations Commitee,

You cause all of this. You could have prevented it but instead you acted like an idiot waving around a big stick expecting it to scare them.

love,
The American People

[Cory]

I do consider the UN the core behind all that sucks with the global policies. They are a bunch of pansies that only use the US to be the power behind there policies. Why do we put up with them any longer I do not know.

[Inside Of You]

But America is all for freedom? We knew about North Korea before Iraq. It was simply because there was more to gain from Iraq and less to lose.

America knows exactly what North Korea has; TIME magazine came out with a full issue describing everything that has been released. 2010; North Korea will have weapons that can reach the U.S. mainland. Weapons have already been developed that can reach Hawaii and Alaska.

I think it's 2010 at least... Give or take a few years.

There wasn't really support for the Iraq war in the first place.

Besides, it's because of the oil that we went into war in the first place. Why else did the U.S. not do anything when it came to Rwanda?

[sonic]

Inside Of You, on Jun 27 2006, 10:02 PM, said:

But America is all for freedom? We knew about North Korea before Iraq. It was simply because there was more to gain from Iraq and less to lose.

America knows exactly what North Korea has; TIME magazine came out with a full issue describing everything that has been released. 2010; North Korea will have weapons that can reach the U.S. mainland. Weapons have already been developed that can reach Hawaii and Alaska.

I think it's 2010 at least... Give or take a few years.

There wasn't really support for the Iraq war in the first place.

Besides, it's because of the oil that we went into war in the first place. Why else did the U.S. not do anything when it came to Rwanda?

What do you know. What do I know. What does any of us know. There is underlying issues that the public either does not know, or chooses to ignore.

Iraq posed a more imediate threat. NK broke UN polocies. Right. But did we have enough to go to war?

[Inside Of You]

I don't understand how Iraq was more important... There is a serious threat from North Korea that is growing everyday and NOW the U.S. wants to do a diplomatic approach.

Probably b/c North Korea would do alot more than Iraq. =/