Price wasn't too bad, will have to see how the product works for me when it arrives.
I decided I needed a terabyte...
#1
Posted 28 February 2007 - 03:42 PM
#2
Posted 28 February 2007 - 03:47 PM
The only reason I would consider that is if I was running a server
#3
Posted 28 February 2007 - 03:48 PM
Woah, 70gb to format. And I thought that my computer loosing 11 was bad
I won't need a new one for a while, 200gb is fine. I had it up to like 160 or so with all the games/(porn) movies/programs I could possibly want
#4
Posted 28 February 2007 - 03:49 PM
#5
Posted 28 February 2007 - 03:51 PM
I won't need a new one for a while, 200gb is fine. I had it up to like 160 or so with all the games/(porn) movies/programs I could possibly want
I lost 18gb and was pissed lol.
#6
Posted 28 February 2007 - 04:11 PM
#7
Posted 28 February 2007 - 04:15 PM
#9
Posted 28 February 2007 - 04:19 PM
#11
Posted 28 February 2007 - 04:35 PM
I like charts .
#12
Posted 28 February 2007 - 06:12 PM
250GB + 80GB (both on the desktop downstairs) + 160GB (on laptop) = 490GB (half a terabyte )
#14
Posted 28 February 2007 - 06:34 PM
But good luck with that terabyte.
#15
Posted 28 February 2007 - 06:56 PM
One crappy thing here is of course that it's only one drive. I couldn't do anything else because I currently use a laptop and docking station as my workstation so being external was required...in a perfect world, I'd have gotten 4 250gb drives so I could toy with RAID.
#16
Posted 28 February 2007 - 07:13 PM
Because of irregularities in the definition and usage of terms for byte multiples, the exact number can be either one of the following:
* 1 septillion 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 bytes  10008, or 1024.
* 1,208,925,819,614,629,174,706,176 bytes  10248, or 280.
Because of these irregularities, the term "yobibyte" has been proposed as an unambiguous reference to the latter value. (See binary prefixes.)
It has been theorized that everything in the entire universe could be stored in one yottabyte of data
Edited by Kronos¡¢, 28 February 2007 - 07:14 PM.
#17
Posted 28 February 2007 - 07:18 PM
Because of irregularities in the definition and usage of terms for byte multiples, the exact number can be either one of the following:
* 1 septillion 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 bytes  10008, or 1024.
* 1,208,925,819,614,629,174,706,176 bytes  10248, or 280.
Because of these irregularities, the term "yobibyte" has been proposed as an unambiguous reference to the latter value. (See binary prefixes.)
It has been theorized that everything in the entire universe could be stored in one yottabyte of data
Original systems designers said people would never need more than 100mb of hd space
Bill Gates said people would never need over 600k of RAM
#18
Posted 01 March 2007 - 12:26 AM
You hould have gone with internal. USB 2.0 has terrible write speed (compared to PATA or SATA).
Honestly, better deal would have been this configuration:
4 x http://www.newegg.co...N82E16822144701
+ http://www.newegg.co...N82E16815124020
($324.95 + S&H)
OR
2 x http://www.newegg.co...N82E16822148108
+ http://www.newegg.co...N82E16815124020
(324.97 + S&H)
That would have been cheaper + faster speeds than the external. Just configure it for Striping and you would have had a 1 Terabyte partition.
Powering tha towuld be nothing. You would need a 500 Watt power supply (probably already have that). Maybe some connectors:
http://www.newegg.co...N82E16812101106 ($1.29) To split standard power cables.
http://www.newegg.co...N82E16812119010 ($2.49) To convert standard power adapter to SATA.
Total cost for all of that is under $350.
Even if you needed a power supply to stand all that: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16817170010
That's still under what you paid for that external.
#19
Posted 01 March 2007 - 06:03 AM
#20
Posted 01 March 2007 - 06:59 AM
You hould have gone with internal. USB 2.0 has terrible write speed (compared to PATA or SATA).
Honestly, better deal would have been this configuration:
4 x http://www.newegg.co...N82E16822144701
+ http://www.newegg.co...N82E16815124020
($324.95 + S&H)
OR
2 x http://www.newegg.co...N82E16822148108
+ http://www.newegg.co...N82E16815124020
(324.97 + S&H)
That would have been cheaper + faster speeds than the external. Just configure it for Striping and you would have had a 1 Terabyte partition.
Powering tha towuld be nothing. You would need a 500 Watt power supply (probably already have that). Maybe some connectors:
http://www.newegg.co...N82E16812101106 ($1.29) To split standard power cables.
http://www.newegg.co...N82E16812119010 ($2.49) To convert standard power adapter to SATA.
Total cost for all of that is under $350.
Even if you needed a power supply to stand all that: http://www.newegg.co...N82E16817170010
That's still under what you paid for that external.
How would I go internal with a laptop? I said in my earlier post that I use a laptop with a docking station so external is everything to me...plus, I enjoy having the thing not be a part of my pc 24/7 just in case the whole computer would fry, I'd still have a drive safe.
#21
Posted 01 March 2007 - 07:43 AM
Hehe. Sorry. In my need to try to seem cool I must have overlooked that post.
ANywho. Do what shabba said. That's actually what I am currently setting up in my home. Just put Linux on my linksys router (better configuration options). All I have to do is "buy" my copy of Win2003, install. Move som stuff aorund. Then I will have my setup working. I gotta call Hughesnet and bitch them out though. They don't allow you to run a server behind their router. It's all because of their NAT and refusal to forward IPs. Bitches. Maybe I can hack it.
#22
Posted 01 March 2007 - 07:53 AM
ANywho. Do what shabba said. That's actually what I am currently setting up in my home. Just put Linux on my linksys router (better configuration options). All I have to do is "buy" my copy of Win2003, install. Move som stuff aorund. Then I will have my setup working. I gotta call Hughesnet and bitch them out though. They don't allow you to run a server behind their router. It's all because of their NAT and refusal to forward IPs. Bitches. Maybe I can hack it.
Actually, shabba's plan is something I intend to implement as the weeks go on...lucky for me, as a network engineer now, I don't need to mod a wrt54g since I have all the cisco routers I want :-P. Anyways, shabba's setup will require some time that I'll eventually invest. One key point in buying this though is that I can easily throw it on a desktop if I need to and use it as external backup for that...I personally enjoy the flexibility of being external since my 2 primaries are both laptops.
#23
Posted 01 March 2007 - 09:21 AM
Im a Cisco engineer by trade, CCNA external im working on my CCNP at the moment, but I am going into the programming sides of things because I love to program
Chris - There is an easier way Install 2003, chuck a secondary ethernet card inside. Use the new eth1 to connect straight from your cable line. Then from your on-board run out to Switch(Layer 3 FTW!) then from there you can go to access points and so on, that way you can control all of the nat,internet access, ip cops, firewalls directly from your server its called routing and remote access. Unless you wanna build a redhat box and load group policy's onto that. Thats a brilliant way of handling things! I have it in my house (2003) I control all of the internet with a gigabyte switch and a cisco access point I think its a 1110 they are really nice..
Group Policy's are what you wanna read up on, I have created a few scripts that log what time people log on and and what time they are log off at, not much but its good for internet controlling. Also I have NPTS which is time setting, it allows all the computers on your network to have exactly the same time set from time.microsoft.com I think.
VPN - If anyone here has ever used it its a definite must have for a network! I use janus which is based on the tor protocol, basically it hides your IP so instead of setting up a proxy you use a logical connection rather than a physical one. I run it on my server, and all connections through it run using tor so my ip is always hidden, unless I want to use it for something normal, its brilliant! I have it on a VM. That way I can allow certain ports and forward the others. I have msn on tor, my sister is on tor and my mum, basically because I dont trust them on my network! I don't use it for anyhting else accept msn I feel safer that way..
If you need any other info on servers gimmie a shout. I am just about to take my Server+ exam and Security+ wooh!
#24
Posted 01 March 2007 - 09:06 PM
#25
Posted 01 March 2007 - 09:56 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users