Quantcast

Jump to content


Photo

Official Harry Potter 7 (Book) Spoiler Thread


  • Please log in to reply
91 replies to this topic

#76 Plew

Plew
  • 1754 posts

Posted 16 August 2007 - 09:17 PM

ooo i finally finish the book after a month but it was decent...

can someone explain something to me:

Spoiler


#77 Bryan

Bryan
  • 4107 posts

Posted 16 August 2007 - 11:50 PM

QUOTE(T3cHniC @ Aug 16 2007, 07:21 PM) View Post
WTF, i thought HArry and Hermione were gonna get it on from the begging. That sucks! lol

Spoiler


#78 Sasha

Sasha
  • 633 posts

Posted 17 August 2007 - 12:35 AM

Depends on how you look at it.
Spoiler

Edited by Sasha, 17 August 2007 - 12:35 AM.


#79 phalkon

phalkon
  • 2399 posts

Posted 17 August 2007 - 05:09 AM

yeah, i'll agree with you on, that. i mean, Ginny's been "there" the whole time, but not much else. it wasn't until what, OotP that she actually starts getting more into the story... unsure.gif

#80 Gen

Gen
  • Ye old gen

  • 1871 posts

Posted 23 August 2007 - 02:13 PM

Damn I just finished it today(after 5 days, counting that I readed a little bit on each, and yesterday I just readden 240 pages(whole in english lol) and today 120 pages...So, it was pretty cool *O*

Spoiler


#81 Charmender

Charmender
  • Awesome

  • 4104 posts


Users Awards

Posted 23 August 2007 - 02:22 PM

Spoiler


#82 spottedtiger

spottedtiger
  • 427 posts

Posted 24 August 2007 - 06:57 PM

Spoiler


Spoiler


i still say at the end she got tired of writing it i mean

Spoiler


#83 Sasha

Sasha
  • 633 posts

Posted 25 August 2007 - 03:13 AM

Spoiler


BTW, do we still need to use the spoiler tags?

#84 Sweeney

Sweeney
  • 1230 posts


Users Awards

Posted 25 August 2007 - 03:18 AM

QUOTE(Sasha @ Aug 25 2007, 11:13 AM) View Post
Spoiler


BTW, do we still need to use the spoiler tags?

Not really... but just in case:
Spoiler


#85 Sasha

Sasha
  • 633 posts

Posted 25 August 2007 - 03:32 AM

QUOTE(Sunscorch @ Aug 25 2007, 02:18 PM) View Post
Not really... but just in case:
Spoiler


Spoiler



#86 Sweeney

Sweeney
  • 1230 posts


Users Awards

Posted 25 August 2007 - 03:51 AM

QUOTE(Sasha @ Aug 25 2007, 12:32 PM) View Post
Spoiler

It did work, but not very well.
And don't refer to the films. The books are better.

I'm pretty sure he used it again somewhere, but then again, the Crucio bit could just be a mental throwback to book five.

#87 Sweeney

Sweeney
  • 1230 posts


Users Awards

Posted 25 August 2007 - 04:18 AM

QUOTE(Kitsune @ Aug 25 2007, 12:15 PM) View Post
Spoiler


Why is it I have such a memory for tedious facts, but try and remember law stuff off the top of my head and I get stuck dry.gif

There we are, I knew it was somewhere... Amycus Carrow, wasn't it? happy.gif

#88 Squishee

Squishee
  • 67 posts

Posted 29 August 2007 - 07:40 PM

This is one good thing to remember
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


#89 ss10009

ss10009
  • 2 posts

Posted 30 August 2007 - 12:05 PM

My take is lovely and interesting (read: lengthy).

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


OK, Rowling says she's going to publish some kind of encyclopedia follow up so I'm waiting on that. And she hasn't sworn on any of her children that she won't publish some back stories (If she makes a book about the Marauders I swear I'll pre order instead of being lazy and going to WalMart day after) so...let's hope for the best!

Uh...my spoiler cut is very long...sorry.

#90 spottedtiger

spottedtiger
  • 427 posts

Posted 30 August 2007 - 02:44 PM

how do you guys do the clicky spoiler thing blink.gif
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


oh cool they changed it smile.gif

#91 Squishee

Squishee
  • 67 posts

Posted 30 August 2007 - 06:23 PM

QUOTE(Kitsune @ Aug 29 2007, 10:28 PM) View Post
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


#92 spottedtiger

spottedtiger
  • 427 posts

Posted 30 August 2007 - 07:31 PM

well jk had an ongoing theme of misunderstood people


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users