Quantcast

Jump to content


Photo

Signature Restrictions


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
60 replies to this topic

#26 Tetiel

Tetiel
  • 11533 posts


Users Awards

Posted 01 September 2007 - 05:23 PM

Having your sig be a page long is extreme and unneeded. THAT is why we changed things. It got out of control. The previous restrictions used to be even worse. We COULD be enforcing those wink.gif

#27 Nick

Nick
  • <img src="http://i29.tinypic.com/9iwl5w.jpg">

  • 6051 posts


Users Awards

Posted 01 September 2007 - 05:24 PM

QUOTE(Tetiel @ Sep 1 2007, 08:23 PM) View Post
Having your sig be a page long is extreme and unneeded. THAT is why we changed things. It got out of control. The previous restrictions used to be even worse. We COULD be enforcing those wink.gif


Why don't you just advertise to the public that they are capable of blocking signatures? Honestly, it didn't bug me and I assume by the lack of complaints previous to recent weeks it wasn't bugging other people either.

#28 Hawk

Hawk
  • hawk·ish·ly

  • 9688 posts


Users Awards

Posted 01 September 2007 - 05:26 PM

QUOTE(Tetiel @ Sep 1 2007, 07:23 PM) View Post
Having your sig be a page long is extreme and unneeded. THAT is why we changed things. It got out of control. The previous restrictions used to be even worse. We COULD be enforcing those wink.gif

If it is unneeded then why did you and other staff members make mine a page long? Huh?

QUOTE(Urban @ Sep 1 2007, 07:24 PM) View Post
Why don't you just advertise to the public that they are capable of blocking signatures? Honestly, it didn't bug me and I assume by the lack of complaints previous to recent weeks it wasn't bugging other people either.

Exactly, we have the option to block signatures dry.gif That can effectively eliminate this problem we have right now.

#29 Brad

Brad
  • How about a magic trick?

  • 4565 posts

Posted 01 September 2007 - 05:28 PM

QUOTE(Hawk @ Sep 1 2007, 09:20 PM) View Post
Wow, you just got back and already you're acting like a dick dry.gif

I've never stopped acting like a dick. You're just noticing it now.

QUOTE(Urban @ Sep 1 2007, 09:21 PM) View Post
What do you mean, attitude? Last time I checked this wasn't barking dictatorship Cuba. I'm entitled to have an opinion, and don't expect just because you make a rule that everyone's going to like it and kiss your ass.

I've never asked anyone to kiss my ass, not have I ever went and made a rule of my own. I'm merely posting staff decisions, and you decided to take it out on me. Sure, you act like you're being mature, calling for a vote, but it's only masking the fact that you're being an immature little kid, crying about not getting your way. Throwing tantrums over small things is something I'd consider an attitude problem.



#30 pyke

pyke
  • 13686 posts


Users Awards

Posted 01 September 2007 - 05:28 PM

QUOTE(Hawk @ Sep 1 2007, 10:20 PM) View Post
Oh, and a select few people can decide what is best for the whole community? This regime sucks blink.gif We might be operating on different wavelengths now.

So far it seems like most people are against limiting the size of signatures, at least the text portion. I'm all for removing the ads, but what is wrong with a few lines of text? You just get used to scrolling over it, and if there is a significant change you will notice it.
QFE
Wow, you just got back and already you're acting like a dick dry.gif

That's the point of staff! Pick what's best for the community. This wasn't brought about because a few lines of text. It was brought about because is the ridiculously large signatures people have.
QUOTE(Urban @ Sep 1 2007, 10:21 PM) View Post
What do you mean, attitude? Last time I checked this wasn't barking dictatorship Cuba. I'm entitled to have an opinion, and don't expect just because you make a rule that everyone's going to like it and kiss your ass.

He means making a snide remark. CC is handy, stating the obvious isn't. Do you have something constructive to say as to why this signature rule is a bad idea?

#31 Waser Lave

Waser Lave

  • 25516 posts


Users Awards

Posted 01 September 2007 - 05:30 PM

It's not like they're saying you can't have a signature at all, I don't see what all the fuss is about...

As far as i'm aware a signature is meant to be used to 'sign off' a message not to provide users with a full screen of crap (the graphics people call it art I believe).

#32 Hawk

Hawk
  • hawk·ish·ly

  • 9688 posts


Users Awards

Posted 01 September 2007 - 05:31 PM

QUOTE(Brandon @ Sep 1 2007, 07:28 PM) View Post
That's the point of staff! Pick what's best for the community. This wasn't brought about because a few lines of text. It was brought about because is the ridiculously large signatures people have.

You're right, signatures are too big. How about you remove the huge quote box below your image. That would free up a ton of space. 6751ov8.png

QUOTE(Brad @ Sep 1 2007, 07:28 PM) View Post
I've never stopped acting like a dick. You're just noticing it now.

Its great to know we have a dick in control now dry.gif

#33 Nick

Nick
  • <img src="http://i29.tinypic.com/9iwl5w.jpg">

  • 6051 posts


Users Awards

Posted 01 September 2007 - 05:33 PM

People use their signatures to share things with other people on the website. Why should they be limited on what they can share? If a person has a 10-line quote that they really want to put in their signature then why shouldn't they be allowed to?

My problem with the rule is that it's blatantly unnecessary, especially when people have the option to block signatures. Honestly it seems like something staff did just to make it seem like stuff was being done with the site. This rule is useless.

#34 Brad

Brad
  • How about a magic trick?

  • 4565 posts

Posted 01 September 2007 - 05:34 PM

Ok, here's how this is going to work. You guys can go cry in the corner or do whatever you want to do by yourselves. What you're NOT going to do is continue bitching about something you have no control over, especially at the people who are your superiors on the board. You keep it up, your posts will be invisibled, and your posting abilities WILL be suspended.

#35 Hawk

Hawk
  • hawk·ish·ly

  • 9688 posts


Users Awards

Posted 01 September 2007 - 05:35 PM

QUOTE(Brad @ Sep 1 2007, 07:34 PM) View Post
Ok, here's how this is going to work. You guys can go cry in the corner or do whatever you want to do by yourselves. What you're NOT going to do is continue bitching about something you have no control over, especially at the people who are your superiors on the board. You keep it up, your posts will be invisibled, and your posting abilities WILL be suspended.

Awww... can't handle a little criticism?

#36 pyke

pyke
  • 13686 posts


Users Awards

Posted 01 September 2007 - 05:40 PM

QUOTE(Hawk @ Sep 1 2007, 09:35 PM) View Post
Awww... can't handle a little criticism?

Criticism? You're just being blatantly rude and nonconstructive. You may want to make a point of making decent posts over the next 24 hours since they'll be going through staff approval.

#37 Tyler.

Tyler.
  • <img src='http://i29.tinypic.com/9bevfc.jpg'>

  • 2373 posts

Posted 01 September 2007 - 05:45 PM

QUOTE(Brad @ Sep 1 2007, 05:39 PM) View Post
The only restriction with these is that while they can be added to a signature, the rest of the signature is limited to a single image (max 550x250), and 3 lines of text. Staff will also be vigilant with checking these spoiler links, so don't try to sneak anything inappropriate in them.

Peace out!

So. Anything that's more than that and not in spoiler tags isn't allowed? Just to be clear.

#38 Brad

Brad
  • How about a magic trick?

  • 4565 posts

Posted 01 September 2007 - 05:46 PM

QUOTE(Tyler. @ Sep 1 2007, 09:45 PM) View Post
So. Anything that's more than that and not in spoiler tags isn't allowed? Just to be clear.

Pretty much, ya.

#39 Jake

Jake
  • 2701 posts

Posted 01 September 2007 - 05:52 PM

I suppose I will shorten my sig, but only for the good of NeoCodex.

#40 redlion

redlion
  • I don't exist!

  • 12072 posts


Users Awards

Posted 01 September 2007 - 06:01 PM

LW, I love yours. It makes a pyramid tongue.gif

#41 Waser Lave

Waser Lave

  • 25516 posts


Users Awards

Posted 01 September 2007 - 06:06 PM

QUOTE(redlion @ Sep 2 2007, 02:01 AM) View Post
LW, I love yours. It makes a pyramid tongue.gif


And make sure you don't forget who was first to do it. tongue.gif

#42 redlion

redlion
  • I don't exist!

  • 12072 posts


Users Awards

Posted 01 September 2007 - 06:07 PM

No, its all you. At least, on this forum.

HOSHIT. Internet street cred +1

#43 cara

cara
  • 56/m/mexico

  • 3364 posts


Users Awards

Posted 01 September 2007 - 06:15 PM

Theres so much .. arguing on codex lately. No more love. We need more group hugs. sad.gif

But um i dont have a problem. Mainly because .. the long sigs are a bit repetitive. They never change. So i dont see why people are pissed. Because its NOT anything new. Nothing they havent seen a hundred times. if seeing a new line in tetiels signature or another sig in ians is SUCH a big deal and pressing a button to see it is SO big of a drag then .. i dunno. you can ignore the rest of this post.

Also .. because im on a laptop and i have a small screen its just SO annoying to see those huge signatures. Not everybody has a new and fast computer. Have some luff for cara and the slowass computers. sad.gif
And no offence but all those text colors started giving me a epileptic attacks and i just scrolled over them anyways.

And ill stop ranting. Because .. i promised myself not to post here. sad.gif

But i must say that um.. the only thing im not loving is the no very mature content. i mean .. stay here for a month and im SURE youll hear worse. sad.gif

edit .. yeah anno .. i talk too much. ;___;

Edited by cara, 01 September 2007 - 06:16 PM.


#44 Tim

Tim
  • 2795 posts

Posted 01 September 2007 - 06:22 PM

It's just signatures, they don't matter. So stop getting all hhhyyypppeee over it.
Rules seem fair to me, noice job staaaaffff.

#45 Nick

Nick
  • <img src="http://i29.tinypic.com/9iwl5w.jpg">

  • 6051 posts


Users Awards

Posted 01 September 2007 - 06:48 PM

QUOTE(Brandon @ Sep 1 2007, 08:40 PM) View Post
Criticism? You're just being blatantly rude and nonconstructive. You may want to make a point of making decent posts over the next 24 hours since they'll be going through staff approval.


Yeah I may have been rude and so was everyone else, but I was not being nonconstructive. My issue when I first posted in this thread was that I found this rule to be pointless because people have the option to block signatures they do not wish to view. If a person has an issue with a large signature they can block it - I personally don't care and actually like seeing these signatures, particularly Tetiel's. smile.gif My issue has now expanded. I have a hard time comprehending why some of the staff seems to think the opinions of the members of Neocodex are not worth anything.


#46 Warlord

Warlord
  • 3988 posts

Posted 01 September 2007 - 06:57 PM

QUOTE(Brad @ Sep 1 2007, 08:18 PM) View Post
Unfortunately, we're the ones in charge. Don't like it, leave. I won't miss you or your attitude.



now now, play nice. Is Wayne Brady gonna have to choke a bitch?

Is my sig in compliance?

#47 Brad

Brad
  • How about a magic trick?

  • 4565 posts

Posted 01 September 2007 - 07:12 PM

QUOTE(Warlord @ Sep 1 2007, 10:57 PM) View Post
now now, play nice. Is Wayne Brady gonna have to choke a bitch?

Is my sig in compliance?

Take out the retired member and you're golden.

#48 Rikku

Rikku
  • 2109 posts

Posted 01 September 2007 - 07:36 PM

QUOTE(Tim @ Sep 1 2007, 08:22 PM) View Post
It's just signatures, they don't matter. So stop getting all hhhyyypppeee over it.
Rules seem fair to me, noice job staaaaffff.


cause some people obnviosly take alot of pride in their sigs... but that's their battle to fight.. mine had always been one image and a small quote... so i'm well within limitations

QUOTE
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Have you got nothing better to do?


no not at all...... plus the pyramid looks pwnful tongue.gif



#49 Brad

Brad
  • How about a magic trick?

  • 4565 posts

Posted 02 September 2007 - 03:02 AM

IAN!

Your signature complies. Tyvm.

#50 Guest_Rambo_*

Guest_Rambo_*

Posted 02 September 2007 - 03:20 AM

But I want my old signature sad.gifsad.gif It was luvvly!


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users