#51
Posted 20 July 2012 - 09:58 PM
#52
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:06 PM
You might want to put a poll in here, Yung.
#53
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:13 PM
What about people who are found guilty by law but are actually innocent?I say yes for all cases. There's always a chance of them raping again when they're released, and to me, even one more person getting raped is unacceptable. They've already struck once, there's no reason to wait for it to happen again. I wouldn't give proven rapists a second chance, the risk is too great for the women around them.
You might want to put a poll in here, Yung.
#54
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:15 PM
What about people who are found guilty by law but are actually innocent?
When I say proven, I mean proven by DNA evidence, something solid. Not that beyond a reasonable doubt stuff.
#55
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:17 PM
#56
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:19 PM
What the fuck is wrong with you?No! No way!
They should be castrated and have the would cauterized.
Then they should live the rest of their days in a dark pit where interaction with humans is minimal.
No sun light, no seeing the face of a human being, no books, no TV etc...
#57
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:29 PM
What the fuck is wrong with you?
Someone very close to me has been raped.
I saw firsthand the effect it had on them.
The people who are capable of doing such a terrible thing to another human being deserve the worst. The death penalty is a cope out.
Edited by Ivysaur, 20 July 2012 - 10:32 PM.
#58
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:34 PM
Under that logic that punishment should apply to you...Someone very close to me has been raped.
I saw firsthand the effect it had on them.
The people who are capable of doing such a terrible thing to another human being deserve the worst. The death penalty is a cope out.
#59
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:36 PM
Under that logic that punishment should apply to you...
The terrible thing in my post was rape.
#60
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:36 PM
#61
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:37 PM
I'm really sorry about your friend, Ivy.
#62
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:38 PM
So raping someone is terrible but keeping someone locked the way you described is cool?The terrible thing in my post was rape.
#63
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:43 PM
So raping someone is terrible but keeping someone locked the way you described is cool?
Yup.
Someone that robs another of their innocence deserves worse.
What the f*** do you think we should do with people that rape young women?
I'm really sorry about your friend, Ivy.
Thanks Ladi.
She's made leaps and bounds in the last few years.
#64
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:43 PM
#65
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:46 PM
Life in prison is the worst thing you could do to them. (besides torture but that's unethical)
#66
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:47 PM
There's no point discussing this with you, you're either really biased or really stupid, I hope it's the former.
I think I'm a bit of both T__T
Sorry...i know I was extremely stand-offish but...I still don't think I'm wrong.
I don't see how punishing a rapist equates to raping someone.
#67
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:49 PM
Uh..that's quite harsh, I'd say. You can't just violate every human right a person has because she raped someone. Of course, I know they should be punished and everything, but not like that! Imagine then, if the rapist got arrested, tortured and raped by some jerk in prison afterwards.Would the rapist's rapist have to suffer the same punishment, considering he wasn't raping an innocent person? Or did he "deserve to get raped"? I feel like torture is a really sensitive subject, because there's such a thin like between what's right and what's wrong, and judging a person based on your own morals is just too unfair, isn't it?No! No way!
They should be castrated and have the would cauterized.
Then they should live the rest of their days in a dark pit where interaction with humans is minimal.
No sun light, no seeing the face of a human being, no books, no TV etc...
Edited by Maloo, 20 July 2012 - 10:50 PM.
#68
Posted 20 July 2012 - 10:55 PM
Honestly, I'm more of a "As long as the punishment fits the crime" kind of person.Uh..that's quite harsh, I'd say. You can't just violate every human right a person has because she raped someone. Of course, I know they should be punished and everything, but not like that!
Imagine then, if the rapist got arrested, tortured and raped by some jerk in prison afterwards.Would the rapist's rapist have to suffer the same punishment, considering he wasn't raping an innocent person? Or did he "deserve to get raped"? I feel like torture is a really sensitive subject, because there's such a thin like between what's right and what's wrong, and judging a person based on your own morals is just too unfair, isn't it?
Touche' Maloo. You made a really great point though...I believe people that commit these should be kept separated from the general population.
And yes...judging someone by my own morals is extremely unfair.
But...so is raping another.
#69
Posted 21 July 2012 - 01:18 AM
#70
Posted 21 July 2012 - 04:04 AM
As for rapists getting the death penalty: no, and especially not across the board. While the effects of rape can be devastating to a person, and in some cases the victim might even kill themselves, it will not ruin every victim's life. Some people will cope with it and move on.
This, to me, is no different than saying that people like Charles Ponzi and Bernard Madoff should be killed as well because their schemes ruined so many people's lives.
#71
Posted 21 July 2012 - 04:27 AM
#72
Posted 21 July 2012 - 04:43 AM
No one has the right to kill someone else, save for self-defence.
I'd add euthanasia in there too as well as killing to protect others (as opposed to just yourself).
#73
Posted 21 July 2012 - 04:50 AM
A hefty prison sentence for the first offence and chemical castration on any further offences would be my choice.
^^That exactly.
#74
Posted 21 July 2012 - 04:53 AM
I'd add euthanasia in there too as well as killing to protect others (as opposed to just yourself).
Euthanasia is different, because it's generally with consent, or someone who's basically already dead.
I agree with protecting others, though.
#75
Posted 21 July 2012 - 04:56 AM
Euthanasia is different, because it's generally with consent, or someone who's basically already dead.
It's still technically killing somebody though, the law currently treats them effectively the same way I think.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users