Expiration date on ranks
#26
Posted 12 March 2008 - 02:57 PM
#27
Posted 12 March 2008 - 03:54 PM
#28
Posted 12 March 2008 - 04:00 PM
I know, but when I was in England, it seemed like more English were drinking Stella than the house beer. It may as well be English, as its made there, and its advertising campaigns are made for England.
#29
Posted 12 March 2008 - 04:28 PM
#30
Posted 14 March 2008 - 04:26 PM
It's ironic that you're contemplating removing the privelages of retired members due to inactivity which s what the term retired impies.
#31
Posted 14 March 2008 - 04:52 PM
#32
Posted 14 March 2008 - 07:23 PM
Been brought up years before. We thought about changing the name, but nothing really came from it.
#33
Posted 14 March 2008 - 08:31 PM
Well then untill you do I think we should conform to the english dictionary.
#34
Posted 14 March 2008 - 08:35 PM
#35
Posted 14 March 2008 - 09:33 PM
I haven't got much of a say since I was retired leader a while ago. Ask Brandon.
#36
Posted 15 March 2008 - 08:01 AM
Retired referes to a general loss of activity after being classified as 'retired' not before.
#37
Posted 15 March 2008 - 10:02 AM
When you retire from something, you simply stop doing it all together. Again, that's not the case with our rank so the definition does not fit our position.
#38
Posted 15 March 2008 - 09:02 PM
#39
Posted 15 March 2008 - 09:10 PM
#40
Posted 16 March 2008 - 04:36 AM
Vote or die!
if i was ever demoted because of my random spikes of inactivity i assure you i would never return.
#41
Posted 16 March 2008 - 04:44 AM
#42
Posted 16 March 2008 - 04:49 AM
#43
Posted 30 March 2008 - 10:07 AM
Pretty good idea, however.
I am not sure of the word to be used here, but if I am right, I think this is a biased poll. I think this question should be asked to the ones who are inactive and ones who tend to go inactive constantly. If I put myself in their position, it would be rather disappointing coming onto Neocodex and finding out that a rank I worked hard for was taken away due to my inactivity. It's like if you want your rank, come to Neocodex or you loose it.
Like xBullet said, anyone who has a high rank such as moderator, retired member, even private member would probably not bother coming in the future because they worked so hard to get that rank and do not have the time or dedication anymore to get it again.
#44
Posted 30 March 2008 - 10:12 AM
Retired is usually given to people who have been at Codex for a while and no the site very well. In my opinion they should be considered people you could go to if you ever had a problem on the site or at least someone you would expect to set the standards for the site. Becoming completely inactive would not be one of them .
What is the shortest time in which someone has been promoted to Retired?
Problem is they can't answer if they are not here
#45
Posted 30 March 2008 - 10:13 AM
This poll is for teams and private / retired member status. Moderator / Super Moderator and Admin are not under the same policies , if you become inactive as one of these you WILL be demoted.
#46
Posted 30 March 2008 - 10:25 AM
Exactly! Which is why we can't make a decision for the ones who are supposed to make it for themselves.
Okay, makes sense. Though, both private and retired are hard to get anyways and the dedication needed to achieve either of the ranks is hard.
#47
Posted 30 March 2008 - 10:26 AM
I agree that they are hard to get, but staff is a position that requires activity while private and retired are not.
#48
Posted 30 March 2008 - 11:11 AM
I think that honor might belong to Tet. She wasn't even a year old when she got it.
#49
Posted 30 March 2008 - 02:12 PM
Wow, impressive
I thought it was a case of you needed to be here for a couple of years or something.
#50
Posted 30 March 2008 - 02:13 PM
I thought it was a case of you needed to be here for a couple of years or something.
Mmm I think the standard now really is at least a year and a half. How she did it...who knows. That's the amazingness of Tet for ya.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users