Expiration date on ranks
#51
Posted 30 March 2008 - 02:14 PM
Adminhax.
#52
Posted 30 March 2008 - 02:15 PM
I thought it was a case of you needed to be here for a couple of years or something.
Straight from the guide at http://www.neocodex....red-t26146.html
Should try reading the guides sometimes.
#53
Posted 30 March 2008 - 02:19 PM
Should try reading the guides sometimes.
Well yeah, someone with no posts could get in. Someone who's been here for 2 months could get in as well. But the chances of that happening are like 1/100,000,000 So yeah that's why I said the standard is a year and half, since someone actually has a chance of getting in then.
#54
Posted 30 March 2008 - 02:22 PM
Should try reading the guides sometimes.
Omg I can get retired?!?!?
#55
Posted 30 March 2008 - 03:02 PM
They don't let transformer-type people in, sorry .
#56
Posted 30 March 2008 - 03:10 PM
Racist!
#57
Posted 30 March 2008 - 03:16 PM
#58
Posted 30 March 2008 - 03:19 PM
Pffft! I bet they don't let animals in either!
#59
Posted 30 March 2008 - 03:24 PM
Or bananas.
#60
Posted 30 March 2008 - 04:03 PM
Or bananas.
Though sure enough they let in Pokemon, right?
#61
Posted 30 March 2008 - 04:31 PM
#62
Posted 30 March 2008 - 05:16 PM
I won't have any problem then, right? o:
#63
Posted 30 March 2008 - 07:14 PM
I'd say remove Private all together, just leave Retired and make it the the new private. Too much hierarchy.
#64
Posted 30 March 2008 - 07:16 PM
member -> advanced member -> private -> retired.
I don't see how it's that hard. That is the core ranks of codex. Everything else is on a separate track all together.
#65
Posted 31 March 2008 - 07:54 PM
I'd say remove Private all together, just leave Retired and make it the the new private. Too much hierarchy.
If you did that there's be one less forum to bitch about people in.
#66
Posted 02 April 2008 - 01:25 PM
#67
Posted 02 April 2008 - 04:47 PM
#68
Posted 02 April 2008 - 05:05 PM
These ranks have no job though. So you wouldn't be doing any more or less than the member next to you who hasn't been around for six months.
#69
Posted 02 April 2008 - 05:27 PM
Oh ok. I still don't like the idea of someone who doesn't even come here still having the rank. I think they should lose it temporarily then but it should be easier for them to get it back the second time. Thanks for clarifying.
#70
Posted 20 April 2008 - 08:16 AM
#71
Posted 20 April 2008 - 08:55 AM
#72
Posted 20 April 2008 - 09:31 AM
I don't really have an opinion on the matter, though. I just know that if I'd lost Retired I'd have probably been a little grumpy about it.
#73
Posted 20 April 2008 - 09:34 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users