Quantcast

Jump to content


Photo

Another Spam-Fest by Neo_grl?


  • Please log in to reply
60 replies to this topic

#51 LiTtLeHaCkEr11

LiTtLeHaCkEr11
  • 564 posts

Posted 27 August 2004 - 04:20 PM

OK I am really sorry for getting carried away. Well here's a little advice for you, ask your friends to come here...I think I should calm down...

#52 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 27 August 2004 - 04:25 PM

maybe it reminded me of when n_g offered 10 mil np to the winner of the spam up codex and bring it down contest? ya hope you know she condones that... you know the one reason I hate all sites with n_g as a admin? cause there is no free speech at all.... anything under a paragraph is spam...and the community is all work and no play ever try a no work and all play website? and you know what fu(k all of you...

View Post


Gah I hate to admit it, but I agree with you on some parts there, with neo_grl as admin, freedom of speech is non-existant, if you are afraid of saying something because of fear of backlashes then freedom of speech is gone. Plus the site is a "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy" site. Remember theses sites are for lesiure, if this is work or stressing or has any form of negativity to you then you should stop and look at it. It you are angry then don't post, I've known that from experience, the more you post when angry, the more you get in trouble.

#53 Typhoon

Typhoon
  • 4133 posts

Posted 27 August 2004 - 04:29 PM

I understand why they are tight on spam, I wish we could (to an extent) be a bit harder on spammers because it's annoying for mods to see which posts actually need moderation. But not as strict as them. And N_G was like RDD, banning anyone who they didn't agree with so about the N_G = RDD thing I genuinely wouldn't be surprised.

#54 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 27 August 2004 - 04:30 PM

See you had a good post there net, why ruin it by posting that last statement. I admit I have (or had) a few problems with members here and on neotwist ( I remember one girl said I wanted to online date because I wanted them to install a gender hack) but I keep everything inside, I don't express my personal opions to other people on the boardsl

#55 LiTtLeHaCkEr11

LiTtLeHaCkEr11
  • 564 posts

Posted 27 August 2004 - 04:33 PM

You can't trust anyone online ( Not even me ) Especially if you never even met them.

#56 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 27 August 2004 - 04:34 PM

I don't think you can trust ANYONE to a certain extent.

#57 Typhoon

Typhoon
  • 4133 posts

Posted 27 August 2004 - 04:35 PM

Actually you can meet people online you can trust, you're just a conformist and listen to every word mommy and daddy tell you. I'v egiven my home address, mobile phone number and surname to members on here and so far all I've had is a pink thong through the mail...

#58 tlim

tlim
  • 246 posts

Posted 27 August 2004 - 04:37 PM

Typhoon, lets not get to more flaming, ive had more than enough :)
Heh....Pink Thong...

#59

Posted 27 August 2004 - 09:08 PM

Sorry toi revive this day old topic but she could have a very handy piece fo equipment like ink does........ (net router ( linkysys)
everyti'me you click a new browser it dishes out a new and REAL ip adress........

#60 Hydrogen

Hydrogen
  • Neocodex Co-Founder

  • 22213 posts


Users Awards

Posted 27 August 2004 - 09:29 PM

Sorry toi revive this day old topic but she could have a very handy piece fo equipment like ink does........ (net router ( linkysys)
everyti'me you click a new browser it dishes out a new and REAL ip adress........

View Post

thats not necissarily the router but just the plan she has with her isp...its called a dynamic ip address ^_^

#61

Posted 27 August 2004 - 09:34 PM

I have that my modem or anything aint dynamic and I have it too and it dishes out a new ip


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users