Josh mentioned pay per use as that would encourage them to make the programs excellent, want to advertise their prog (and therefore the site), and it'd also mean they'd likely keep the program up to date.
Right that would be the most efficient way if we can get a system to calculate all that n what not.
But we still need to figure out the min amount of payment programmers would be willing to accept for their work.. then we can divide that into monthly/weekly payments based on usage or something.
I think a pay monthy rather than pay per use. Pay per use limits the freedom of the buyer. Pay monthly keeps the same programmer incentive aswel as allowing the users to get the full use out of the programs they buy for an entire month.
It wouldn't hurt to have 2 options. Pay per use for those that only want to use it a few times, or pay monthly.
We could combine those two options..
Pay programmers every month depending on how many times their programmers were used?
Added a poll if you guys are curious as to how many of us agree/disagree. With the programmers for now.