Congratulations on being an utter bastard
Homosexuality and Evolution
#26
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:12 PM
Congratulations on being an utter bastard
#27
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:16 PM
#28
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:18 PM
If he was gay, he would have done so prior.
Gay men aren't out to be predators. At least not any more than heterosexuals. I suspect one of my friends could be gay, but I don't really care either way.
#29
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:21 PM
So I take it you're not friends with any unattractive girls, then.
You must be a very sexy man to be able to assume that any gay guys you spend time with would want to jump your bones.
A contemporary, colloquial definition would be more appropriate.
#30
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:23 PM
No, I don't mean slang.
I mean a contemporary, colloquial definition. Didn't I say that?
#31
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:23 PM
You beat me to it -.-
#32
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:33 PM
No, Josh, I'm smart enough to see that you're attempting to equivocate my use of contemporary defintions with the use of slang, the latter of which would appear to undermine my intellectual position.
#33
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:34 PM
Gay men aren't out to be predators. At least not any more than heterosexuals. I suspect one of my friends could be gay, but I don't really care either way.
Is there a guidebook for this? He could just as easily tell me that he's gay, then hit on me sometime later. Like I said, it probably wouldn't happen and I would feel uncomfortable around them.
You must be a very sexy man to be able to assume that any gay guys you spend time with would want to jump your bones.
A contemporary, colloquial definition would be more appropriate.
There's a complete difference here. Morally, I'd rather be with unnattractive girls then gay guys, and besides, a paperbag over the face never hurts?
And you're taking this completely out of context, I think I'm alright, but I never said they were jumping out at me. Did I offend you or what? I pretty much made a joke post and you're grinding me.
Edited by Jake, 29 January 2009 - 07:35 PM.
#34
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:34 PM
http://dictionary.re.../browse/bastard
jus sayin
I know if I was gay, I'd totally swing for Jake. No question about who'd wear the pants at least.
Edit: In seriousness Jake, if he was a real friend, I'd imagine he would respect your sexual preference enough to not hit on you.
#35
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:39 PM
2. SLANG
Interesting.
Was totally referring to definition #3.
#36
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:41 PM
Sacrificing concision in favour of precision is perfectly acceptable as far as I'm concerned.
#37
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:41 PM
#38
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:42 PM
Most likely true, but it would still be majorly akward, especially when you get to those times where you accidentally hit your friends balls etc.
#39
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:44 PM
And you're taking this completely out of context, I think I'm alright, but I never said they were jumping out at me. Did I offend you or what? I pretty much made a joke post and you're grinding me.
Your first paragraph is what's known as "shifting the goalposts". You first said it would be weird in case he tried to hit on you.
When it was pointed out that this was an illogical position, you've shifted to a moral standpoint, with no justification as to why homosexual behaviours are immoral.
I'm not taking it out of context, I'm following the run of your argument to point out its inherent absurdity.
Joke posts don't belong in the debating section.
#40
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:45 PM
I don't think even a gay person would take getting hit in the balls as a come on.
#41
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:46 PM
I hate when people say "WHAT IF HE HITS ON ME?" Do you not have friends who know what you're into or know how to respect your boundaries? If a friend knows you're not gay, he probably is not going to hit on you. The fact that you put yourself so high up that you think just because someone is gay, they're going to hit on you, is just as bad.
#42
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:48 PM
It should be, if simplifying it loses the point that I was making.
Besides which, my original post wasn't even addressed to you, so I don't really have to satisfy your stringent criteria.
More awkward than accidentally touching a female friend's breast?
You really aren't making much of a case here.
#43
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:50 PM
Anyways, it's cool, I was just messing with Joe, but I always forget he has all the big people behind him all the time Tis why I try not to pick on him much, always get a good 3 to 4 other people jumping on the bandwagon with him
Hrmm...
...
Very well
You should pick on Joe all the time. I'll make a specific forum for it if you'd like.
How the hell do you hit your friends in the balls? (At least by accident)
#44
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:53 PM
When it was pointed out that this was an illogical position, you've shifted to a moral standpoint, with no justification as to why homosexual behaviours are immoral.
I'm not taking it out of context, I'm following the run of your argument to point out its inherent absurdity.
Joke posts don't belong in the debating section.
Well, it's what it was, I'm sorry it happened big shot. I don't have anything to back it up, I just wouldn't like them as friends.
rofl nice. I make one small post and you guys take it as if I offended a whole gay community. I'm suggesting that because that's one of the main reason, I never suggested I was godly or some shit.
You really aren't making much of a case here.
No it isn't, because no matter how akward it was, I would still end up laughing about it after. Nothing is funny about a guy touching my gonads. (sp?)
#45
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:53 PM
Besides, you didn't even have to respond to my post.
True.
#46
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:55 PM
Iunno, I just laughed. I do believe you are incorrect about it not being funny.
#47
Posted 29 January 2009 - 07:56 PM
No it isn't, because no matter how akward it was, I would still end up laughing about it after. Nothing is funny about a guy touching my gonads. (sp?)
You don't have any coherent reasoning behind your opinon? At all?
Then perhaps you should consider changing it.
Isn't that the same regardless of whether your friend is gay or not, then, if nothing is funny about a guy touching your gonads?
#48
Posted 29 January 2009 - 08:00 PM
It's only funny for others who have seen it.
Then perhaps you should consider changing it.
Isn't that the same regardless of whether your friend is gay or not, then, if nothing is funny about a guy touching your gonads?
Why would I change it? I would only have negative opinions about my other choice.
Generally, yes. But then the whole 'hitting on me' part comes into the situation. Did he do it on purpose or by accident? inb4 thinking highly of self.
#49
Posted 29 January 2009 - 08:19 PM
There is the chance they could all be gay obviously, they're all so random it's almost impossible to tell though. But I would wish that I was only surrounded by one 'type', unless if they were lesbians. /inb4 hypocrites etc.
#50
Posted 30 January 2009 - 12:34 AM
2) Less competition because you always here the gay men are the best/taken.
But if a friend told me he was gay, our friendship would end there because IMO, it would be way too weird.
Look dude, I was a god-praising fag basher until about '02 or '03, and 7 some odd years later all of my friends are gay. That part of their lives I couldn't give two shits about because theyre my friends and i wouldnt be alive with out them.
Lets assume homosexuality is a choice or an acquired taste or some bullshit like that. Even in that case, are you gonna let a bro down because he fucks guys? That's kinda fucked up to disown a friend over something so minor as a technicality as to who sucks your prick. Either way, you need to get release and get laid, so who gives a shit if your friend likes it a bit differently? I'm sure if it were a lesbian you wouldn't give a shit but she has just as much right to disown you for having a dick and "thats just awkward, talking to someone with different equiment from what i like."
Edited by Athean, 30 January 2009 - 12:35 AM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users