Quantcast

Jump to content


Photo

Gay Marriage


  • Please log in to reply
179 replies to this topic

#1 Nick

Nick
  • <img src="http://i29.tinypic.com/9iwl5w.jpg">

  • 6,051 posts


Users Awards

Posted 12 April 2009 - 02:52 PM

is inevitable.

Discuss.

#2 Dan

Dan
  • Resident Know-It-All

  • 6,321 posts


Users Awards

Posted 12 April 2009 - 03:18 PM

What's there to discuss? It's inevitable.

#3 Tetiel

Tetiel
  • 11,532 posts


Users Awards

Posted 12 April 2009 - 04:06 PM

In certain Muslim countries where they're still being killed daily and put in concentration camps? Doubtful.

In America? Yes.

#4 Jaf

Jaf
  • 1,654 posts

Posted 12 April 2009 - 05:18 PM

I really can't think about any 'cons about ze gay marriage... oh wait I'm an atheist, right.
Gay marriage is the solution to the financial crisis

#5 Bryan

Bryan
  • 4,107 posts

Posted 12 April 2009 - 05:45 PM

QUOTE (Dan @ Apr 12 2009, 04:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
What's there to discuss? It's inevitable.



#6 Ives

Ives
  • 4,320 posts


Users Awards

Posted 12 April 2009 - 07:49 PM

I don't see what the point ever was about the other sides argument. Their "slippery slope" argument was kinda fucking ridiculous. How the hell would a guy marrying a sheep ever be acceptable? If he cant fuck a sheep in this society, theres no way hell marry one.

#7 Nick

Nick
  • <img src="http://i29.tinypic.com/9iwl5w.jpg">

  • 6,051 posts


Users Awards

Posted 13 April 2009 - 01:53 AM

What's amusing is that anything the anti-gay marriage coalitions are putting out there are ironically aiding the pro-gay marriage side. Has anyone seen that "A Storm is Gathering" video?

#8 brandonxan

brandonxan
  • 114 posts

Posted 13 April 2009 - 06:40 AM

If you completely take away the religion side of it..I have no clue why it isn't already legal. Why would state legislatures vote no for it? I'm really curious to see what their reasons are, if any apart from religious beliefs.

#9 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16,889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 13 April 2009 - 09:08 AM

Hurrah for forcing people and religions to compromise. Hurrah for the tryanny of the majority (or in this case, queens.)

#10 sonic

sonic
  • 3,452 posts

Posted 20 April 2009 - 10:40 PM

QUOTE (Frizzle @ Apr 13 2009, 09:08 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hurrah for forcing people and religions to compromise. Hurrah for the tryanny of the majority (or in this case, queens.)


Post of the year.

#11 Sida

Sida
  • Tsvetesman

  • 3,865 posts

Posted 21 April 2009 - 02:26 AM

Power to the gays!

#12 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16,889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2009 - 05:30 AM

QUOTE (Sida @ Apr 21 2009, 11:26 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Power to the gays!


Power is absolute as you cannot create nor destroy power, you merely transfer it. If you give homosexuals more power you are taking it from others.

#13 Sida

Sida
  • Tsvetesman

  • 3,865 posts

Posted 21 April 2009 - 05:39 AM

QUOTE (Frizzle @ Apr 21 2009, 02:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Power is absolute as you cannot create nor destroy power, you merely transfer it. If you give homosexuals more power you are taking it from others.


I said power to the gays not energy to the gays lol tongue.gif

#14 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16,889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2009 - 06:32 AM

I didn't say anything about energy? They're similar but not the same..

#15 Sida

Sida
  • Tsvetesman

  • 3,865 posts

Posted 21 April 2009 - 06:50 AM

QUOTE (Frizzle @ Apr 21 2009, 03:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I didn't say anything about energy? They're similar but not the same..


Your sentence was about energy, figured you said power by mistake. Either way...

Power to the gays!

biggrin.gif

#16 brandonxan

brandonxan
  • 114 posts

Posted 21 April 2009 - 06:54 AM

QUOTE (Frizzle @ Apr 21 2009, 05:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Power is absolute as you cannot create nor destroy power, you merely transfer it. If you give homosexuals more power you are taking it from others.

LOL how about that made no sense at all.
You have an extreme habit of completely confusing the issue at hand in every single debate topic you post in.
This topic is about what you think about gay people getting married. Letting two dudes or two girls legally declare that they want to be together forever has absolutely nothing at all to do with "taking power from other people"
Lol...

#17 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16,889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2009 - 08:59 AM

QUOTE (Sida @ Apr 21 2009, 03:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Your sentence was about energy, figured you said power by mistake. Either way...

Power to the gays!

biggrin.gif


No it wasn't about energy. I guess that went over your head.


QUOTE (brandonxan @ Apr 21 2009, 03:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LOL how about that made no sense at all.
You have an extreme habit of completely confusing the issue at hand in every single debate topic you post in.
This topic is about what you think about gay people getting married. Letting two dudes or two girls legally declare that they want to be together forever has absolutely nothing at all to do with "taking power from other people"
Lol...


Forcing churches into marrying gays is taking away their power of free choice. Please don't try and humilate me as that can be a hard thing to do.

#18 Tetiel

Tetiel
  • 11,532 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2009 - 09:01 AM

QUOTE (Frizzle @ Apr 21 2009, 12:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Forcing churches into marrying gays is taking away their power of free choice. Please don't try and humilate me as that can be a hard thing to do.

Can you further explain this? Maybe this is something unique to England. How are they forcing churches do marry gay couples which is against their religion.

#19 Sida

Sida
  • Tsvetesman

  • 3,865 posts

Posted 21 April 2009 - 09:10 AM

QUOTE (Frizzle @ Apr 21 2009, 05:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
No it wasn't about energy. I guess that went over your head.


So you were basically just chatting shit.

QUOTE (Frizzle @ Apr 21 2009, 05:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Forcing churches into marrying gays is taking away their power of free choice. Please don't try and humilate me as that can be a hard thing to do.


Noone forces churches to do anything. Step off your horse.

#20 Waser Lave

Waser Lave

  • 25,516 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2009 - 09:30 AM

QUOTE (Frizzle @ Apr 21 2009, 05:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Forcing churches into marrying gays is taking away their power of free choice. Please don't try and humilate me as that can be a hard thing to do.


I think most people understand that churches are private institutions and have the right to choose for themselves who they marry or don't but that shouldn't affect civil weddings in registry offices and the like where religion isn't an issue.

#21 Sida

Sida
  • Tsvetesman

  • 3,865 posts

Posted 21 April 2009 - 10:27 AM

QUOTE (Waser Lave @ Apr 21 2009, 06:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think most people understand that churches are private institutions and have the right to choose for themselves who they marry or don't but that shouldn't affect civil weddings in registry offices and the like where religion isn't an issue.


It's a shame though really because the ceremony is the best part usually.

#22 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16,889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2009 - 10:51 AM

QUOTE (Sida @ Apr 21 2009, 06:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
So you were basically just chatting shit.

Nope, you just didn't understand it. For some reason started going off on a tangent about energy..

QUOTE (Waser Lave @ Apr 21 2009, 06:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think most people understand that churches are private institutions and have the right to choose for themselves who they marry or don't but that shouldn't affect civil weddings in registry offices and the like where religion isn't an issue.


That's already legal, not talking about that but weddings.

#23 Sida

Sida
  • Tsvetesman

  • 3,865 posts

Posted 21 April 2009 - 11:15 AM

QUOTE (Frizzle @ Apr 21 2009, 07:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Nope, you just didn't understand it. For some reason started going off on a tangent about energy..


Lol what you said was about energy (yes I know you said power)...didn't see how it had anything to do with gays and marriage.

#24 Waser Lave

Waser Lave

  • 25,516 posts


Users Awards

Posted 21 April 2009 - 11:31 AM

QUOTE (Frizzle @ Apr 21 2009, 07:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That's already legal, not talking about that but weddings.


Same-sex marriage isn't legal in the UK yet even in registry offices.

QUOTE (Sida @ Apr 21 2009, 08:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Lol what you said was about energy (yes I know you said power)...didn't see how it had anything to do with gays and marriage.


I don't think he was talking about physical power.

#25 Sida

Sida
  • Tsvetesman

  • 3,865 posts

Posted 21 April 2009 - 11:36 AM

QUOTE (Waser Lave @ Apr 21 2009, 08:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Same-sex marriage isn't legal in the UK yet even in registry offices.



I don't think he was talking about physical power.


I know...he was talking in response to "Power to the gays!"..but I still don't see how it had anything to do with it.

I didn't say that meaning electrocute them lol


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users