[chobitz]

Frizzle, on 17 March 2010 - 03:23 PM, said:

lol at implying a war can be structured by law. lol even more at "international" law.

Actually american law does require certain steps to declare war. Thats why the vietnam war is considered a "conflict" and not a war.

Bush jumped over the laws and those he didn't jump over he shit or pissed on and those he couldn't he created homeland security to get over those 'silly laws'..

[iargue]

chobitz, on 17 March 2010 - 04:03 PM, said:

Actually american law does require certain steps to declare war. Thats why the vietnam war is considered a "conflict" and not a war.

Bush jumped over the laws and those he didn't jump over he shit or pissed on and those he couldn't he created homeland security to get over those 'silly laws'..

Actually, the war on Iraq was 100% legal. He moved troops in, which is his power, and then congress declared war.

[kbbbb]

Toxic-Snipe, on 16 March 2010 - 01:08 AM, said:

http://www.tms.org/p...eagar-0112.html

meh

I don't know what to believe anymore.

There was this conspiracy theorist debunker on Colbert Report (I think) a few days ago, saying if conspiracies were real, how come very few people knew about them and had the insight and it wasn't the conclusion drawn by the media, etc etc.

From the little I know of the twin towers, they blew up because they were made of steel which got hot and exploded on impact, and due to a lack of concrete used in the construction, the metal frame melted or imploded or something and they collapsed.

They lacked concrete due to the mafia's hold on the concrete market in the 1970s (ergo very expensive) when they were constructed.

[mrPomroy]

Frizzle, on 17 March 2010 - 03:23 PM, said:

lol at implying a war can be structured by law. lol even more at "international" law.

seconded.

War isn't exactly the most civilized thing out there... too much wrong going on, on EITHER side, to be able to control it with laws I believe it was more civilized when the two sides met on a field and just shot each other until one was declared victor... ha... ha? o.o

kbbbb, on 17 March 2010 - 11:53 PM, said:

They lacked concrete due to the mafia's hold on the concrete market in the 1970s (ergo very expensive) when they were constructed.

That's kinda funny... in like, an ironic, sad sorta way.

[kbbbb]

mrPomroy, on 18 March 2010 - 02:17 AM, said:

That's kinda funny... in like, an ironic, sad sorta way.

And also unfortunate when things hit them at high speed, carrying fuel. I presume there are quite a few buildings that have been built the same way- only not as tall and not as iconic.

[mrPomroy]

kbbbb, on 18 March 2010 - 02:29 AM, said:

And also unfortunate when things hit them at high speed, carrying fuel. I presume there are quite a few buildings that have been built the same way- only not as tall and not as iconic.

Yes but we won't get conspiracy theorists about those when they crumble because they wouldn't cause as much drama/interest

[iargue]

mrPomroy, on 18 March 2010 - 02:17 AM, said:

seconded.

War isn't exactly the most civilized thing out there... too much wrong going on, on EITHER side, to be able to control it with laws I believe it was more civilized when the two sides met on a field and just shot each other until one was declared victor... ha... ha? o.o

Fail.


War = multiple battles.

[mrPomroy]

iargue, on 18 March 2010 - 10:23 AM, said:

Fail.


War = multiple battles.

Fail? I believe you're being a little overcritical

I was giving a vague reference towards however it was done long ago... sorry my post wasn't up to your military standards?

Besides, where did I ever say in one battle? I was describing how the fighting went, not the step by step process of it. Terribly sorry an abbreviated version doesn't suit you, but you need to stop looking for places to be right, it'll make you look like an asshole.

[iargue]

mrPomroy, on 18 March 2010 - 11:13 AM, said:

Fail? I believe you're being a little overcritical

I was giving a vague reference towards however it was done long ago... sorry my post wasn't up to your military standards?

Besides, where did I ever say in one battle? I was describing how the fighting went, not the step by step process of it. Terribly sorry an abbreviated version doesn't suit you, but you need to stop looking for places to be right, it'll make you look like an asshole.

[mrPomroy]

iargue, on 18 March 2010 - 01:12 PM, said:

Fair enough. You'll get your smile. Just don't analyze my posts with more thought than there was thought put into them.

And, in keeping up my end of the deal,

[Reddevil]

well, the twin towers, i was 11 years old, and just came from school, watching tv, when suddenly.. i thought i was watching a plane crash movie, and no shit, it was real life on tv