Okay, sources.
Penguin pop'l: http://www.athropoli...ct-penguins.htm
That page doesn't have any population info at all, but it does link to a page that says the population of Adelie penguins is growing at a rate of 1% per year, and that the population of Emperor penguins on the archipelago has been stable since 1984.
Oops?
French Glacier: http://newsbusters.org/node/13798
The Dôme du Goûter glacier is a part of a permanent ice field above a height of 4000-odd meters. At that height, precipitation is almost all solid, and adds to the mass of the glacier. Global warming is not yet severe enough to have a measurable and sustained effect at that height, although there was a heatwave in 2003 that caused surface-melt on the glacier.
For comparison, the glacier at Mer de Glace, in a similar area but at around half the elevation, has decreased by 120m between 1990 and 2005.
To summarise, you're lauding the absence of a piece of evidence that no one predicted in the first place.
Mt. Emi Koussi:
You see that snow? When I went there last year, I asked my Berber guide whether it was usual. He told me it had never been seen there previously.
In short, weather is not the same as climate. I believe I posted that already.
The long version, though, is that climate change predicts fluctuations like this, as ice-free seas in Siberia heat up and cause drastic alterations to the seasonal currents of both air and sea. One other interesting thing to note is that when you compare recent cold temperatures to patterns of similar atmospheric conditions such as pressure from the past, they are actually warmer than they would have been twenty or thirty years ago. In the case of Britain, which just had a rather severe winter, the difference was four degrees warmer than similar weather patterns caused in the past.
(And for the record, anecdotal evidence is not traditionally accepted in rigorous discourse).
Edit: Also, here's a funny thing. Having just looked up that photo, it's from 2002. Another oops?