[Melchoire]

I just saw this on reddit. Some mormon dude can't look at porno or nudity so he invented bubbling to get around it:

















^i'm pretty sure they're underaged

Discuss how fucking brilliant this is

[Warriors]

HAhaha at the last one..good call mate..Wow, A Mormon did a good thing for once, I am truly astonished.

EDIT: Weird..I saw no last pic for the last one, and after I replied there it was...

This post has been edited by Warriors: 02 September 2010 - 12:32 AM

[MsRose]

It's really fucking gross in my opinion.

Porn start know people are going to masturbate to them. They get paid to show off their bodies so guys can imagine doing erotic things to them.


These girls are just people out swimming
and some weirdo is going to squeeze one out to them.

[Warriors]

MsRose, on 02 September 2010 - 12:32 AM, said:

It's really fucking gross in my opinion.

Porn start know people are going to masturbate to them. They get paid to show off their bodies so guys can imagine doing erotic things to them.


These girls are just people out swimming
and some weirdo is going to squeeze one out to them.

People do the same to clothed individuals..It's all up to the sick perverted person I would say..Man will find away, regardless of nudity, to rub one out...its crazy..

[MsRose]

Lol, the girl in the first picture looks like she's going to fall over with her massive tits.

[wtfints71]

haha. true. the first thing that comes into mind is naked.

why why why

dirty me

[Code]

MsRose, on 02 September 2010 - 12:32 AM, said:

It's really fucking gross in my opinion.

Porn start know people are going to masturbate to them. They get paid to show off their bodies so guys can imagine doing erotic things to them.


These girls are just people out swimming
and some weirdo is going to squeeze one out to them.

^ That.

LOL they looks so real though

[EzioAuditore]

I think it's great, if the last picture didn't have two underaged girls.

Rubbing one out to that IS wrong.

[Trichomes]

I don't understand why people think it's gross or disgusting that guys (or girls) masturbate to pictures of girls they find attractive, whether they're in a state of undress or not. It's not like those girls are ever going to know, and even if they were to find out, it' actually sort of flattering. I also don't think they're anything wrong with finding underage (post-pubescent) girls attractive. You do realize those girls are sexually mature, even if they're not 18 yet, and years ago it was common for 14-16 year old girls to get married and start families, right? Those girls appear to be somewhere around this age range. What IS wrong is manipulating underage girls and coercing them to get naked or do sexual things with you. There's nothing wrong with looking and becoming aroused, thus doing something about it, and it certainly doesn't make you a pedophile.

Btw I think this is awesome.

This post has been edited by Trichomes: 02 September 2010 - 07:22 AM

[MsRose]

Trichomes, on 02 September 2010 - 07:21 AM, said:

I don't understand why people think it's gross or disgusting that guys (or girls) masturbate to pictures of girls they find attractive, whether they're in a state of undress or not. It's not like those girls are ever going to know, and even if they were to find out, it' actually sort of flattering. I also don't think they're anything wrong with finding underage (post-pubescent) girls attractive. You do realize those girls are sexually mature, even if they're not 18 yet, and years ago it was common for 14-16 year old girls to get married and start families, right? Those girls appear to be somewhere around this age range. What IS wrong is manipulating underage girls and coercing them to get naked or do sexual things with you. There's nothing wrong with looking and becoming aroused, thus doing something about it, and it certainly doesn't make you a pedophile.

Btw I think this is awesome.

So you wouldn't mind a 75 year old man masturbating to you in your swim suit?
I suggest you post a picture then so we can bubble it

[Sweeney]

MsRose, on 02 September 2010 - 07:34 AM, said:

So you wouldn't mind a 75 year old man masturbating to you in your swim suit?
I suggest you post a picture then so we can bubble it

Are you saying you're really a 75 year old man?

[Trichomes]

MsRose, on 02 September 2010 - 07:34 AM, said:

So you wouldn't mind a 75 year old man masturbating to you in your swim suit?
I suggest you post a picture then so we can bubble it

Honestly, no. That 75 year old man has the right to do whatever the hell he wants, and I'm not underage either. Would I want to witness a 75 year old man masturbating to my pictures? Of course not, but that's not even the issue.

If I felt comfortable posting a picture of myself in a bikini, I would.

[MsRose]

Sweeney, on 02 September 2010 - 07:41 AM, said:

Are you saying you're really a 75 year old man?

Shush Sweeny!

[WakaWaka]

damn thats some pretty tame material to fap to...
its like fapping to good housekeeping.

[Noitidart]

Wow this is all sick and disgusting. First of all the society is disgusting to think bikini's/tight low cut apparel with tits hanging out and jeans up her ass and cunt are a form of clothing not a form of nakedness...

[Waser Lave]

Noitidart, on 02 September 2010 - 03:06 PM, said:

Wow this is all sick and disgusting. First of all the society is disgusting to think bikini's/tight low cut apparel with tits hanging out and jeans up her ass and cunt are a form of clothing not a form of nakedness...

That's your opinion, not everybody shares that opinion so I don't think it's exactly fair to say that society is disgusting just because they don't conform to your beliefs.

[Noitidart]

This isn't my belief i mean look at them. There body isn't covered. And the people looking at them are called pervs? The people walking around naked are the pervs.

[Georgina]

Noitidart, on 02 September 2010 - 03:06 PM, said:

Wow this is all sick and disgusting. First of all the society is disgusting to think bikini's/tight low cut apparel with tits hanging out and jeans up her ass and cunt are a form of clothing not a form of nakedness...

Id love to see noit try and get a top to cover up his huge titties and still look good/fashionable....its not easy finding a top that wont show a bit of cleavage for me, clothing is standard size and my middle is smaller than my bosom therefor the correct size top, tends to end up looking "low cut". And a bigger top, will just look stupid/ wont help me for being low cut anyway, only more baggy round my middle.

My only other option would be to wear a top up to my neck everyday which is impractical, ugly and got damn warm.

[punkrockbigmouth]

Noitidart, on 02 September 2010 - 03:06 PM, said:

Wow this is all sick and disgusting. First of all the society is disgusting to think bikini's/tight low cut apparel with tits hanging out and jeans up her ass and cunt are a form of clothing not a form of nakedness...

Wait. So what should they wear at the pool?

[Waser Lave]

Noitidart, on 02 September 2010 - 03:21 PM, said:

This isn't my belief i mean look at them. There body isn't covered. And the people looking at them are called pervs? The people walking around naked are the pervs.

It is your belief that their body should be covered, I believe it should be their choice what they wear as long as it doesn't break any indecency laws in their location.

[Noitidart]

Hey its their choice to be a perv or not. How different do they look from when they are having sex. Less then 1 square foot of material needs to be removed from their body. And everything can be seen already, even tho it is "covered".

[punkrockbigmouth]

Noitidart, on 02 September 2010 - 03:28 PM, said:

Hey its their choice to be a perv or not. How different do they look from when they are having sex. 

I'm sure they're sweatier and their facial expressions are like.... 

[Waser Lave]

Noitidart, on 02 September 2010 - 03:28 PM, said:

Hey its their choice to be a perv or not. How different do they look from when they are having sex. Less then 1 square foot of material needs to be removed from their body. And everything can be seen already, even tho it is "covered".

If they're comfortable with that then it's up to them, they aren't breaking any laws so it's not up to us to judge other people.

[Frizzle]

Noitidart, on 02 September 2010 - 03:28 PM, said:

Hey its their choice to be a perv or not. How different do they look from when they are having sex. Less then 1 square foot of material needs to be removed from their body. And everything can be seen already, even tho it is "covered".

I'm sorry. You consider this a problem? I consider this just more images for the wank bank.

Unless..you prefer men in skimpy clothings and speedos?

[Noitidart]

haha punk. i dont think the guys are checking out their faces and are close enough to see the sweat.
if they're comfortable with being a perv then don't be like im just swimming dont fap/perv on me. you're naked doll you're visually perving.