I got my time by watching videos of other people playing the game and they DID beat the game 10 seconds quicker then the quickest score I posted, so I thought it'd be okay... plus I did say that people may want to add a little time just in case, even though my times/scores worked perfectly fine for me on multiple accounts. It was just a my suggestion. The score I posted was an obvious typo so I don't see why that would make my post completely invalid.. Thanks for posting safer times though.
I DID do research before posting. Obviously.. I wouldn't post without checking first. The game works by giving you more points the quicker you finish each puzzle. The video I watched was 3:21 (201 seconds) long and got a score of 3196. Another one was 3:51 (231 seconds) long and got a score of 3189. I really don't see the point in waiting an extra 2 minutes before sending the score when it doesn't come up with for review. I already did add a little time and I would even understand adding an extra minute or so, but it seems like you are overdoing it.
Also, the score I posted was suppoed to be 3101-3140. It could even have a max of 3145, but I thought it'd be safe to stay off of the top scores table, which started at 3148 when I posted, so I think it'd be safe if people didn't actually post scores of up to 3150. Why would I intentionally post a max score lower than the minimum score...
Geez guys... I was just trying to help by posting what worked for me... Nit picky. I'll remember to keep my information to myself next time.
They're only being cautious and I can't blame them. Sending the wrong scores and times means losing your account. There are people who test scores on multiple accounts before even posting them up here as you said you did too. They're only giving constructive criticism that would benefit others. It's a community here. No need to get your panties in a bunch.