Quantcast

Jump to content


Realisticerror

Member Since 09 Jul 2018
Offline Sep 09 2018 06:23 PM

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Sleeping with a married person

15 July 2018 - 07:30 PM

So .. don’t put pimps in jail as long as they only sell sex to adults?

Don’t put people selling illegal guns in jail?

Where does this end? Or does it only apply to certain things? Clearly you think it only applies to certain things, which is why you brought up pot not being so bad. But who are you to say what laws aren’t that bad and are okay to break?

 

I used pot as an example because it's relevant, the only person affected by the crime in that case is the consenting adult purchasing his product, if the adult decides to go steal some stuff to pay for their next fix do you pin the theft on the dealer?


In Topic: Sleeping with a married person

15 July 2018 - 07:14 PM

So .. don’t put drug dealers in jail as long as they only sell crack to adults?

 

I mean, if the adults are consenting (re: not addicted at the time of first purchase) is it really anyones business? pot is legal now in a lot of areas and as far as I know there's been no great increase in any societal harm, eg. robbery, car accidents, etc.


In Topic: Sleeping with a married person

15 July 2018 - 07:02 PM

I don't really understand what your question is here. Is someone wrong for purposely enabling rule-breaking? Then yes. Otherwise, I have no clue what you mean, honestly.

 

Sorry, I'm not the best at writing out my thoughts, let me try again (hoping this isn't too off-topic):

 

the developers of Greasemonkey created a program to allow client side javascript calls, Neopians figured out that this was a great way to cheat the system and auto-play games like pyramids.

 

Are the devs to be blamed for providing the service, or are the neopians who used the service for breaking the rules?


In Topic: Sleeping with a married person

15 July 2018 - 06:49 PM

I'm not saying the third person should be blamed for the actions of the cheater. I'm saying they're a bad person for participating with them.

 

Also, I do blame the Program Manager devs for enabling cheating - they literally created a program allowing non-tech savvy people to prolifically cheat. Not that I'm mad at it, but if I were TNT, I'd be banning both. TNT notoriously hates Codex - if they could fuck us up, they would.

 

Oh, well yeah, in that case I agree with you, they are a shitty person, maybe I misread the question, I thought it was more about where the blame lies.

 

I disagree that the programmers are to blame, there are plenty of legit programs in the world that are used for illegit purposes (obviously a program designed specifically for cheating is a bad example), maybe something like greasemonkey is a better example, created to allow developers to more heavily utalize their own javascript capabilities, ended up being used for browser based autoplayers on Neopets, lol.

 

Cara: the problem there is you're using a 13 year olds lack of experience and life skills as a reason for them to not understand that what they're doing is stupid and hurting someone, I'm assuming the married man/woman is an adult of sound mind and normal human empathy.


In Topic: Sleeping with a married person

15 July 2018 - 06:19 PM

Si!

 

Again I am baffled by the thought process of people who think this shit is all about a good time for them. We all have a responsibility to be good to one another. Just because someone didn't take a vow doesn't mean they're any less of a dick for participating in this sort of thing.

 

eh, I'm not saying you're not a dick for doing it, just that you can't be blamed for the behaviour of others. 

 

For example, Neocodex (not sure the specific dev) created Abrosia, should the dev be blamed for the users who were looking to cheat, and going to cheat regardless of if they found Abrosia, or should you ban the cheaters instead?

 

if TNT really wanted to ban Neocodex as a site they would most likely have legal cause to do so, but instead they just keep banning the autobuyers themselves.