Quantcast

What works and what is paused · Email is limited to account activation and password resets.

Jump to content


Photo

Did I mess up using AoB?


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 nbot

nbot
  • 8 posts

Posted 02 January 2012 - 09:16 AM

Was going for the Maths Nightmare avatar using AoB. I used Brain Tree -> Easy Peasy and scores of 5 -> 120, which was probably overkill but I forgot I had changed both values. I ended up getting close to the top score but still under the top score, and the same as someone else who was already on the high score list. So, although my score was much higher than I needed/originally planned for the avatar, I submitted anyway, thinking it'd be safe.

My score is under review right now, which is fine, but when I checked back on the high score table a few hours later, the person with the same score as me disappeared!

Now I'm worried. Even if I got under the top score, could I have possibly gotten an impossible score? Why was the person with the same score as me on the table (means their score must have been reviewed and passed, right?) then not on the table?

halp, so many questions wat do etc.

Advertisement

    #2 Sweeney

    Sweeney
    • 1230 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 02 January 2012 - 09:20 AM

    The benefif of using AoB on scores with set intervals for their scoring is that you can't mess it up, because the hacks simply multiply the points that you get.

    #3 nbot

    nbot
    • 8 posts

    Posted 02 January 2012 - 09:24 AM

    The benefif of using AoB on scores with set intervals for their scoring is that you can't mess it up, because the hacks simply multiply the points that you get.


    That's what I figured, but I'm thinking I sent my score a little too quickly for the points I got. :x And that mysterious disappearing score ...

    #4 Sweeney

    Sweeney
    • 1230 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 02 January 2012 - 09:27 AM

    I wrote benefif. Heh.

    Timing is the worst bit of AoB, because it's the bit that's still down to the person.

    #5 nbot

    nbot
    • 8 posts

    Posted 02 January 2012 - 09:37 AM

    Hah, I didn't notice either. Well my timing definitely wasn't instantly recognisable as inhumanly fast. (I did play through several rounds.) It was too fast for my score though. It seems to be hit or miss with TNT noticing these things, so I guess I'll have to wait and see. x_x

    #6 holaCarlos

    holaCarlos
    • 290 posts

    Posted 02 January 2012 - 11:23 AM

    You accidentally the whole thing...

    #7 ch33psh33p

    ch33psh33p
    • 249 posts

    Posted 02 January 2012 - 12:52 PM

    I know exactly who you're talking about.

    9360 is an illegit score, he was iced.

    Edited by ch33psh33p, 02 January 2012 - 12:53 PM.


    #8 Hush

    Hush
    • 340 posts

    Posted 02 January 2012 - 01:07 PM

    I know exactly who you're talking about.

    9360 is an illegit score, he was iced.

    well that user in the highscore list with 10.050 is defenitly illegit too. Why is she not iced

    #9 Elindoril

    Elindoril
    • Weeaboo Trash

    • 9255 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 02 January 2012 - 01:18 PM

    well that user in the highscore list with 10.050 is defenitly illegit too. Why is she not iced

    Either she'll be caught eventually, or blame it on faulty detection skills.

    #10 nbot

    nbot
    • 8 posts

    Posted 02 January 2012 - 01:20 PM

    Either she'll be caught eventually, or blame it on faulty detection skills.


    Geh, I better hope for the latter as well then. Thanks for the input everyone.

    #11 ch33psh33p

    ch33psh33p
    • 249 posts

    Posted 02 January 2012 - 08:02 PM

    You can get away with it, just not everytime.

    Looks like you passed. =)

    #12 nbot

    nbot
    • 8 posts

    Posted 02 January 2012 - 08:24 PM

    You can get away with it, just not everytime.

    Looks like you passed. =)


    Guess this makes me pretty identifiable, but my account is nothing noteworthy.
    Phew, I guess!


    1 user(s) are reading this topic

    0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users