Quantcast

Jump to content


Photo

Shameless BC Plug


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#1 Vince

Vince
  • 16 posts

Posted 29 January 2012 - 07:42 AM

PM me for a link if you want to vote.

Please and thank you. When I plug on the BC forums on Neo, people tend to ignore or insult me.

Wonder why.

Edited by Vince, 29 January 2012 - 08:09 AM.


#2 Jun

Jun
  • 907 posts

Posted 29 January 2012 - 07:44 AM

Are you sure you want to reveal your account here?

#3 Spirited

Spirited
  • 677 posts


Users Awards

Posted 29 January 2012 - 07:46 AM

I wouldn't say it's shameless, but rather dangerous bc plug you have there.

#4 Vince

Vince
  • 16 posts

Posted 29 January 2012 - 07:46 AM

Are you sure you want to reveal your account here?


Honestly it's fine with me, I'm just an artist and I rarely do anything I can get in trouble for in public. :p

I still have -one- completely secret account, after all.


#5 Spirited

Spirited
  • 677 posts


Users Awards

Posted 29 January 2012 - 07:48 AM

Honestly it's fine with me, I'm just an artist and I rarely do anything I can get in trouble for in public. :p

I still have -one- completely secret account, after all.


That may be true, but this is a cheating site afterall, and you could just be reported for appearing here. :o

#6 Rainie

Rainie
  • 854 posts

Posted 29 January 2012 - 07:49 AM

Are you sure you want to reveal your account here?


o3o
His signature has already been revealing his account for > a month, I'm pretty sure he's aware of it.

I'll vote on my shells later if you want :p~

#7 Vince

Vince
  • 16 posts

Posted 29 January 2012 - 07:50 AM

That may be true, but this is a cheating site afterall, and you could just be reported for appearing here. :o


I thought it was okay to plug my own pet, what the christ.

Some of Neo's rules make no sense. I plug my pets elsewhere. :(

If I made a mistake and somehow get disqualified, whatever. If the kids care THAT much about winning, I'm not gonna lose sleep. I'm too old to. ;(

#8 Jun

Jun
  • 907 posts

Posted 29 January 2012 - 07:53 AM

If you don't mind then its ok, my vote goes for you (:

#9 Vince

Vince
  • 16 posts

Posted 29 January 2012 - 07:53 AM

If I somehow make it to the end after this post (thanks for future reference by the way), thanks for the votes anyway. lol

#10 Spirited

Spirited
  • 677 posts


Users Awards

Posted 29 January 2012 - 07:55 AM

I thought it was okay to plug my own pet, what the christ.

Some of Neo's rules make no sense. I plug my pets elsewhere. :(

If I made a mistake and somehow get disqualified, whatever. If the kids care THAT much about winning, I'm not gonna lose sleep. I'm too old to. ;(


It's okay. All I meant was that the account is linked to your main, or your "surface" main.
The risk is yours to take though. :)

#11 Vince

Vince
  • 16 posts

Posted 29 January 2012 - 07:56 AM

I understand, yeah. I'm not that worried, but I still appreciate the heads-up.

Ever since I joined this forum I've been very well taken care of by very helpful people. :) It keeps me around, even if I don't post so much.



#12 Vince

Vince
  • 16 posts

Posted 29 January 2012 - 08:30 AM

Vince, even though you don't do anything wrong, associated your account with Neocodex is a dangerous thing. Whist most of us don't care if you do or don't cheat, there can be the odd asshole from the BDC or AC boards who lurk here screens jotting and reporting accounts.

TNT aren't going to give you the benefit of the doubt if you do get reported. There have been plenty of perfectly legit players iced for false reasons, you certainly wouldn't be the first.


Okay, okay. You've convinced me.

I'm gonna take the link out then. If anyone is interested in giving me a vote, just PM me.

Good thing I wake up earlier than most teens on a Sunday. :x

Edited by Vince, 29 January 2012 - 08:09 AM.


#13 Applepi

Applepi
  • 1641 posts


Users Awards

Posted 29 January 2012 - 08:53 AM

PMed :)

#14 Oaken

Oaken
  • 7298 posts


Users Awards

Posted 29 January 2012 - 09:22 AM

I received a PM from someone making an offer on one of my TP items that directly referenced Codex and its item database in the Neomail xD

I should go check if they got banned....be right back....

Not banned. I guess the item database is a rather handy tool even for legit players. It would be harsh for the person to get banned.

#15 Vince

Vince
  • 16 posts

Posted 29 January 2012 - 06:42 PM

I'm home from work, wanted to say thanks again. You guys are quite helpful. :)

#16 Yung

Yung
  • Codexian

  • 3361 posts


Users Awards

Posted 29 January 2012 - 06:45 PM

I received a PM from someone making an offer on one of my TP items that directly referenced Codex and its item database in the Neomail xD

I should go check if they got banned....be right back....

Not banned. I guess the item database is a rather handy tool even for legit players. It would be harsh for the person to get banned.


Virtually everyone on the TDN forums use our database over JN's, but they never say that publicly. Like Crimson has said multiple times to me in PM that he uses our Item Database and several other members there are members here but they never post anything. Such a shame.

#17 Vince

Vince
  • 16 posts

Posted 29 January 2012 - 06:52 PM

I would use the item db more if the prices were more accurate. Every time I check NC against TP prices they're inaccurate. Am I doing something wrong?

#18 Yung

Yung
  • Codexian

  • 3361 posts


Users Awards

Posted 29 January 2012 - 06:57 PM

No. The Unbuyables in our database need to be entered in manually. You can always help out by posting here:

Updating Item Database for Non-Advanced Members

Any time you notice something like that just post there and someone will update the database. This is how you can help out :)

#19 Vince

Vince
  • 16 posts

Posted 29 January 2012 - 09:40 PM

Cool, man. I'll do it now.

#20 Taki

Taki
  • 47 posts

Posted 30 January 2012 - 12:01 AM

If you still want a vote pm me :) I tried BC before but was also ignored...I feel your pain -.-


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users