Quantcast

What works and what is paused ยท Email is limited to account activation and password resets.

Jump to content


Photo

Any math geeks in the house?


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Melchoire

Melchoire
  • 5284 posts


Users Awards

Posted 18 May 2013 - 11:33 AM

Working on solving a circuit problem.

 

My problem boils down to applying the reverse Laplace transform on a certain function. I can't seem to manipulate it to a form that easily reversable.

 

Here's the s-domain function:

 

3QL2Hsz.png

 

The function on the left is a sine with frequency w. The one on the right is an exponential. But not sure what to do about their product.

 

Any ideas?



Advertisement

    #2 ShadowLink64

    ShadowLink64
    • 16735 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 18 May 2013 - 12:08 PM

    Inverse Laplace transforms follow the principle of superposition, so I think you'll have to do partial fraction decomposition. You have two distinct factors on the bottom, and so you want to split the problem where you have a sum of:

     

    w/((s^2+w^2)(s+R/L)) = (As+B)/(s^2 + w^2) + C/(s + R/L)

     

    Or something like that. Then just find what A,B, and C are by matching coefficients with the correct powers of s, and take the inverse Laplace transform of each term.

     

    Hopefully this works out. :p



    #3 Melchoire

    Melchoire
    • 5284 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 18 May 2013 - 07:52 PM



    Inverse Laplace transforms follow the principle of superposition, so I think you'll have to do partial fraction decomposition. You have two distinct factors on the bottom, and so you want to split the problem where you have a sum of:

     

    w/((s^2+w^2)(s+R/L)) = (As+B)/(s^2 + w^2) + C/(s + R/L)

     

    Or something like that. Then just find what A,B, and C are by matching coefficients with the correct powers of s, and take the inverse Laplace transform of each term.

     

    Hopefully this works out. :p

     

    Doesn't work out for me, I'm left with:

     

    w = As(s2 + R/L) + B(s + R/L) + C(s2 + w2)

     

    Which means A, B, and C are 0?



    #4 ShadowLink64

    ShadowLink64
    • 16735 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 19 May 2013 - 12:17 PM

     

    Doesn't work out for me, I'm left with:

     

    w = As(s2 + R/L) + B(s + R/L) + C(s2 + w2)

     

    Which means A, B, and C are 0?

    No. You should have:

    w = As(s + R/L) + B(s + R/L) + C(s2 + w2)

     

    w = As2 + As(R/L) + Bs + B(R/L) + Cs2 + Cw2

     

    A + C = 0 to balance the s2 terms.

    A(R/L) + B = 0 to balance the s terms.

    B(R/L) + Cw^2 = w to balance the zeroth order terms.

     

    I can tell you right now that A, B, and C are not all zero. :p



    #5 Melchoire

    Melchoire
    • 5284 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 20 May 2013 - 12:17 PM

    No. You should have:

    w = As(s + R/L) + B(s + R/L) + C(s2 + w2)

     

    w = As2 + As(R/L) + Bs + B(R/L) + Cs2 + Cw2

     

    A + C = 0 to balance the s2 terms.

    A(R/L) + B = 0 to balance the s terms.

    B(R/L) + Cw^2 = w to balance the zeroth order terms.

     

    I can tell you right now that A, B, and C are not all zero. :p

     

    You are correct, I'd forgotten how to do these decompositions. :p

     

    In any case I solved the 3 systems and ended up with some gnarly looking expressions. But can't argue with the math right? Thanks for your help =)



    #6 Melchoire

    Melchoire
    • 5284 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 22 May 2013 - 04:18 PM

    So after I went with this path my final answer didn't work out.

     

    It turns out the way you set up the partial fraction expansion is like so:

     

    F(s) = A/(s + R/L) + B/(s - jw) + B*/(s + jw)

     

    With this approach you end up with complex values for B and B*




    1 user(s) are reading this topic

    0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users