251 replies to this topic

[ic3doom]

I cunt wait until this event is over

 

My cunt can't either.

[DrewPCoq]

Game ID: 1075

Score (AAA): 3101-3040

Time: 210-240

 

You may want to add a little more time just in case, but it has been working perfectly fine for me.

Also, the lowest score on the high score table is 3148, so I would stay under that to be safe.

[Hummingway]

 

Game ID: 1075

Score (AAA): 3101-3040

Time: 210-240

 

You may want to add a little more time just in case, but it has been working perfectly fine for me.

Also, the lowest score on the high score table is 3148, so I would stay under that to be safe.

 

 

3101-3040?

[SweetHoney]

On the neoboards someone is saying 3220+ isn't legit possible.

 

"For people getting over 3220+ It's not legitly possible. Your round points are doubled if you put in the last pieces of the tangram very quickly after eachother. The round will double and you'll get double the points, which is a bug in the game. Just a heads up"

 

 

I scored 3232 with reasonable time using AoB. So does that mean I'm in the firing line? =/

[anewvision]

These max score games make me nervousssssss 0_______0

[ic3doom]

The max score for Shenkuu Tangram is 3375. Those below that score with reasonable times should be safe.

[anewvision]

 

Game ID: 1075

Score (AAA): 3101-3040

Time: 210-240

 

You may want to add a little more time just in case, but it has been working perfectly fine for me.

Also, the lowest score on the high score table is 3148, so I would stay under that to be safe.

 

That time is absolutely not safe... I strongly advise against using it........ especially considering the score makes no sense

 

AAA - 3100

GameID: 1075 Score: 3100-3140 Time: 310-335    <------ Use this

Edited by aNEWvision, 11 August 2013 - 05:12 AM.

[Strategist]

 

Game ID: 1075

Score (AAA): 3101-3040

Time: 210-240

 

You may want to add a little more time just in case, but it has been working perfectly fine for me.

Also, the lowest score on the high score table is 3148, so I would stay under that to be safe.

 

Please make sure you do some research before posting times that are obviously unsafe.

 

320-380 is a much safer time and people might as well use 3100-3150 as a score.

[Kono]

Hey! Just wanted to give the heads up that I have a SS list all the way up to Day 13. The list I used has only been tested with two accounts so please send me some feedback if you do use it.

 

Notes:

• I haven't gotten any reviews for any of the scores.
• The list also does not beat AAA's score on almost all of them save for maybe one or two.
• These scores aren't *exactly* in order of the Daily Dare Challenges, but all of them are there.

Here is my list, feel free to tell me if there is something wrong with it:

 

 

GameID: 615 Score: 700-753 Time: 649-745
GameID: 571 Score: 546-560 Time: 293-406 Mod 2
GameID: 619 Score: 1500-4880 Time: 420-435 Mod 5
GameID: 887 Score: 8760-9600 Time: 764-831
GameID: 159 Score: 1250-1300 Time: 692-744
GameID: 527 Score: 1275-1799 Time: 360-390
GameID: 1189 Score: 60000-61000 Time: 232-355 Mod 100
GameID: 562 Score: 2000-2100 Time: 812-945
GameID: 660 Score: 1700-1720 Time: 600-625
GameID: 773 Score: 4000-4300 Time: 530-589
GameID: 1202 Score: 6450 Time: 450-460
GameID: 885 Score: 2600 Time: 383-480
GameID: 1075 Score: 2800-3150 Time: 383-480
 

Just copy and paste in to notepad, then save it and run it through the score sender.

 

Have a question? I probably won't answer it. Just saying. I'll post another updated list if I get a few "thank you" PMs. (I'm not egotistical, I just want to know that it works and that people are reading this)

[Elva]

For MAGAX: max legit scores on the HST at the start of the day are 4319. Just in case SSers start stuffing with values like they did with Skirmish

 

AOB:

 

Infinite Life: (Credits to Coilvect)
96 0e 00 07 01 00 00 00 07 01 00 00 00 04 01 08 1a
96 0E 00 07 00 00 00 00 07 01 00 00 00 04 01 08 1A 

Edited by Elva, 11 August 2013 - 11:13 PM.

[Mandie]

I just realized....I haven't participated in this event. At all. Oh well.

[Vibe]

I just realized....I haven't participated in this event. At all. Oh well.

 

You can still participate! It's not too late. You can always use the list that Kono has posted. c=

[stacy]

Thank you Kono. Saved me a lot of time and frustations.

[DrewPCoq]

That time is absolutely not safe... I strongly advise against using it........ especially considering the score makes no sense

 

AAA - 3100

GameID: 1075 Score: 3100-3140 Time: 310-335    <------ Use this

 

I got my time by watching videos of other people playing the game and they DID beat the game 10 seconds quicker then the quickest score I posted, so I thought it'd be okay... plus I did say that people may want to add a little time just in case, even though my times/scores worked perfectly fine for me on multiple accounts. It was just a my suggestion. The score I posted was an obvious typo so I don't see why that would make my post completely invalid.. Thanks for posting safer times though.

 

 

 

Please make sure you do some research before posting times that are obviously unsafe.

 

320-380 is a much safer time and people might as well use 3100-3150 as a score.

 

I DID do research before posting. Obviously.. I wouldn't post without checking first. The game works by giving you more points the quicker you finish each puzzle. The video I watched was 3:21 (201 seconds) long and got a score of 3196. Another one was 3:51 (231 seconds) long and got a score of 3189. I really don't see the point in waiting an extra 2 minutes before sending the score when it doesn't come up with for review. I already did add a little time and I would even understand adding an extra minute or so, but it seems like you are overdoing it.

Also, the score I posted was suppoed to be 3101-3140. It could even have a max of 3145, but I thought it'd be safe to stay off of the top scores table, which started at 3148 when I posted, so I think it'd be safe if people didn't actually post scores of up to 3150. Why would I intentionally post a max score lower than the minimum score...



Geez guys... I was just trying to help by posting what worked for me... Nit picky. I'll remember to keep my information to myself next time.

[anewvision]

I got my time by watching videos of other people playing the game and they DID beat the game 10 seconds quicker then the quickest score I posted, so I thought it'd be okay... plus I did say that people may want to add a little time just in case, even though my times/scores worked perfectly fine for me on multiple accounts. It was just a my suggestion. The score I posted was an obvious typo so I don't see why that would make my post completely invalid.. Thanks for posting safer times though.

 

 

 

 

I DID do research before posting. Obviously.. I wouldn't post without checking first. The game works by giving you more points the quicker you finish each puzzle. The video I watched was 3:21 (201 seconds) long and got a score of 3196. Another one was 3:51 (231 seconds) long and got a score of 3189. I really don't see the point in waiting an extra 2 minutes before sending the score when it doesn't come up with for review. I already did add a little time and I would even understand adding an extra minute or so, but it seems like you are overdoing it.

Also, the score I posted was suppoed to be 3101-3140. It could even have a max of 3145, but I thought it'd be safe to stay off of the top scores table, which started at 3148 when I posted, so I think it'd be safe if people didn't actually post scores of up to 3150. Why would I intentionally post a max score lower than the minimum score...



Geez guys... I was just trying to help by posting what worked for me... Nit picky. I'll remember to keep my information to myself next time.

Perhaps you should, because it seems your poor research and information will do nothing but get people frozen. You obviously know very little about making a score safe...

[ic3doom]

Spoiler

I got my time by watching videos of other people playing the game and they DID beat the game 10 seconds quicker then the quickest score I posted, so I thought it'd be okay... plus I did say that people may want to add a little time just in case, even though my times/scores worked perfectly fine for me on multiple accounts. It was just a my suggestion. The score I posted was an obvious typo so I don't see why that would make my post completely invalid.. Thanks for posting safer times though.

 

 

 

 

I DID do research before posting. Obviously.. I wouldn't post without checking first. The game works by giving you more points the quicker you finish each puzzle. The video I watched was 3:21 (201 seconds) long and got a score of 3196. Another one was 3:51 (231 seconds) long and got a score of 3189. I really don't see the point in waiting an extra 2 minutes before sending the score when it doesn't come up with for review. I already did add a little time and I would even understand adding an extra minute or so, but it seems like you are overdoing it.

Also, the score I posted was suppoed to be 3101-3140. It could even have a max of 3145, but I thought it'd be safe to stay off of the top scores table, which started at 3148 when I posted, so I think it'd be safe if people didn't actually post scores of up to 3150. Why would I intentionally post a max score lower than the minimum score...



Geez guys... I was just trying to help by posting what worked for me... Nit picky. I'll remember to keep my information to myself next time.

 

They're only being cautious and I can't blame them. Sending the wrong scores and times means losing your account. There are people who test scores on multiple accounts before even posting them up here as you said you did too. They're only giving constructive criticism that would benefit others. It's a community here. No need to get your panties in a bunch.

Edited by ic3doom, 12 August 2013 - 05:49 AM.

[Syntax]

I DID do research before posting. Obviously.. I wouldn't post without checking first. The game works by giving you more points the quicker you finish each puzzle. The video I watched was 3:21 (201 seconds) long and got a score of 3196. Another one was 3:51 (231 seconds) long and got a score of 3189. I really don't see the point in waiting an extra 2 minutes before sending the score when it doesn't come up with for review. I already did add a little time and I would even understand adding an extra minute or so, but it seems like you are overdoing it.
 

 

That extra two minutes could be the difference between looking legit and looking shady if TNT ever checks your account. I put like an extra 2 minutes on all of my safe timings. I'm also certain that people who use my scores also put an extra minute or two on top of my scores. The paranoia is the reason we still have our accounts. We're not nitpicking, but it's important for the scores that people put up to be safe, cause SSing is the easiest way to lose your account if you don't know what you're doing. You can't even take a screenshot to "prove" that you played it if you ever got flagged, which can easily be done with AOB.

 

Anyway. Moving on: MAGAX Destroyer II AAA

 

GameID: 763 Score: 4000-4100 Time: 1200-1500

 

Tested thrice, as usual.

[Elva]

GameID: 763 Score: 4000-4100 Time: 1200-1500

 

Tested thrice, as usual.

 

THANK YOU for this. I played semi-legit with AoB on my main and still found it painful to struggle through. Definitely SSing for my shell.

[Ladida]

Finally a game I can beat AAA legit in!

[infernox]

ugh i played this one legit for last year's daily dare i think...took way too long. thanks man

[spruced21]

GameID: 763 Score: 4000-4100 Time: 1200-1500

 

When I used this, I got the following error:

[ID/score/time] - Error Sending.

 

Any idea what this is? The score and time both fall in that range, and searching for a solution has not gotten me any solutions.  Thanks.

[Ladida]

When I used this, I got the following error:

[ID/score/time] - Error Sending.

 

Any idea what this is? The score and time both fall in that range, and searching for a solution has not gotten me any solutions.  Thanks.

It had a problem sending the score and it didn't go through. Just send it again

[spruced21]

Alright, thanks so much!  I thought that's what it was but wanted to be sure because I've never encountered that error before.

[mintpro]

SS for Bruno's Backwoods Breakaway:

 

// Beat Chadley
GameID: 734 Score: 1540 Time: 190-250

// Beat AAA
GameID: 734 Score: 2620 Time: 350-420
 

I got the times and scores by playing conservatively with the invicible AOB. AAA score was also tested by score sending with my shell.

 

No ranges because there's a max score for each level. Chadley's score beats level 6 and stops and AAA's score beats level 9 and stops. Last level is 12 with a max score of 5180. Check it out at: http://www.jellyneo....kwoodsbreakaway

Edited by mintpro, 13 August 2013 - 12:10 AM.

[anewvision]

SS for Bruno's Backwoods Breakaway:

 

// Beat Chadley
GameID: 734 Score: 1540 Time: 190-250

// Beat AAA
GameID: 734 Score: 2620 Time: 350-420
 

I got the times and scores by playing conservatively with the invicible AOB. AAA score was also tested by score sending with my shell.

 

No ranges because there's a max score for each level. Chadley's score beats level 6 and stops and AAA's score beats level 9 and stops. Last level is 12 with a max score of 5180. Check it out at: http://www.jellyneo....kwoodsbreakaway

^This

 

For anyone else that feels like posting scores, take notes. This is research. TY.