Posted 14 March 2014 - 08:58 AM
Meh, I care about things around here and react seriously to the implication that I don't contribute.
Oh, we're meant to be serious here? 
In that case, as you know, most of those things you mention are beyond my remit and not my responsibility but the ones which are within my remit are progressing well, thanks for asking.
M'lord
Posted 14 March 2014 - 09:02 AM
Oh, we're meant to be serious here?
In that case, as you know, most of those things you mention are beyond my remit and not my responsibility but the ones which are within my remit are progressing well, thanks for asking.
no
Posted 14 March 2014 - 09:03 AM
If there aren't major changes to Neocodex RIGHT NOW I am going to be VERY ANGRY. What do we even pay you people for???
*hoists torch and pitchfork*
🍴Aioli-American🍴
Posted 14 March 2014 - 09:04 AM
When I get this feeling, I just change my site theme.If there aren't major changes to Neocodex RIGHT NOW I am going to be VERY ANGRY. What do we even pay you people for???
*hoists torch and pitchfork*
Posted 14 March 2014 - 09:05 AM
All publicly announced and discussed within announcement threads.
The first and last points have both been discussed in IRC by members of various member levels.
These discussions happen and take place outside of designated threads.
He's also not the only person to point out that these changes have been promised and promised yet nothing has happened. Which is typical Codex.
Clearly I said "A lot of these things" not "ALL of those things"
But thanks for dropping in this month to put your two cents where it isn't wanted, Yung 
Resident Know-It-All
Posted 14 March 2014 - 09:06 AM
If there aren't major changes to Neocodex RIGHT NOW I am going to be VERY ANGRY. What do we even pay you people for???
*hoists torch and pitchfork*
Spoiler
Nobody has ever demanded anything *right now*
I think everyone has been pretty patient considering these things were announced nearly 5 months ago and no visible progress has been made on some of the biggest parts
Posted 14 March 2014 - 09:07 AM
I think everyone has been pretty patient considering these things were announced nearly 5 months ago and no visible progress has been made on some of the biggest parts
Which is understandable
Hopefully we can touch base with Cody about some of the big ones tonight.
Posted 14 March 2014 - 09:07 AM
Nobody has ever demanded anything *right now*
Yes they have, it didn't end well...
Resident Know-It-All
Posted 14 March 2014 - 09:27 AM
Which is understandable
Hopefully we can touch base with Cody about some of the big ones tonight.
Yes they have, it didn't end well...
Spoiler
Posted 14 March 2014 - 10:30 AM
Aww, don't be so mean
I don't think you need to get involved.
Posted 14 March 2014 - 10:32 AM
True, and I don't know what is going on
Even more reason to keep your cello out.
Posted 14 March 2014 - 12:12 PM
Random question...
So how much rep can a person give each day? and is it per day or per 24 hours?
Posted 14 March 2014 - 12:33 PM
3 per 24 hours for us plebs, 5 per 24 hours for retired members I think.
i vote to increase
Posted 14 March 2014 - 12:36 PM
i vote to increase
Rep wasn't meant to be a "like" button but it does seem that's been how people use it since I've been here
Posted 14 March 2014 - 12:36 PM
Rep wasn't meant to be a "like" button but it does seem that's been how people use it since I've been here
It's still as pointless as it's always been
Posted 14 March 2014 - 12:37 PM
I also think it's more than 5 for Retired users? They'd know better than me.
It's still as pointless as it's always been
You could probably answer my above question
Posted 14 March 2014 - 12:40 PM
I also think it's more than 5 for Retired users? They'd know better than me.
You could probably answer my above question
I don't use the rep system, so probably not 
Posted 14 March 2014 - 12:41 PM
I don't use the rep system, so probably not
*Shakes fist*
Posted 14 March 2014 - 12:41 PM
Rep wasn't meant to be a "like" button but it does seem that's been how people use it since I've been here
whats the difference between "rep" and "liking" isn't it showing the person you agree with their post?
Please feel free to correct me.
Posted 14 March 2014 - 12:54 PM
whats the difference between "rep" and "liking" isn't it showing the person you agree with their post?
Please feel free to correct me.
Rep, I believe, was originally implemented to be given to posts that provided a contribution to the forum, that people found useful.
Like a guide.
Not like "ahahaha you told her good! you're hilarious! +rep" but like I said, reps have been thrown around pretty loosely as long as I've been a member and as Sweeney said, before that as well.
Posted 14 March 2014 - 12:56 PM
Rep, I believe, was originally implemented to be given to posts that provided a contribution to the forum, that people found useful.
Like a guide.
Not like "ahahaha you told her good! you're hilarious! +rep" but like I said, reps have been thrown around pretty loosely as long as I've been a member and as Sweeney said, before that as well.
ahh ok 
Weeaboo Trash
Posted 14 March 2014 - 12:56 PM
Posted 14 March 2014 - 12:58 PM
As soon as people thought it was like Facebook they abused it as such.
Oh well. It helps my e-peen.
YOU!! Retired Member! How many reps do you get a day?
Posted 14 March 2014 - 01:04 PM
So if it's a pointless thing, why not do away with it and/or make it into an actual "like" system?
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Community Forum Software by IP.Board 3.4.8
Licensed to: Neocodex
This topic is locked
