Quantcast

Jump to content


Photo

Trade Banned Userbar


  • Please log in to reply
97 replies to this topic

#76 Magical

Magical
  • Banned from trading - Do not trade with this member!

  • 801 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2014 - 03:02 AM

For the love of God, please stop responding. You honestly could not possibly dig yourself a deeper hole, for reals.

 

<3 Okay



#77 Sweeney

Sweeney
  • 1230 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2014 - 04:45 AM

I wasn't going to say anything further but... :p

It's unethical to enforce morals upon someone. Just because you don't agree with something doesn't mean you have to prevent them from doing something *pokes those dang Republicans*

I don't let my friend smoke weed in my house, but that doesn't mean I'll chain him to a tree to stop him from doing it outside.


We are not preventing you from doing anything, just from doing it here. Which, as a privately owned organisation, is exactly our right, and far from unethical.

#78 Bone

Bone
  • no

  • 3638 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2014 - 05:01 AM

*Hops on one foot while rubbing tummy in circles and patting head*

BRING BACK NEGATIVE REP!


Can we make this thread about why negative rep needs to be reimplemented instead of Magical? It's a topic that's been needlessly discussed fewer times.

#79 NapisaurusRex

NapisaurusRex
  • 🍴Aioli-American🍴

  • 9425 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2014 - 06:35 AM

Can we make this thread about why negative rep needs to be reimplemented instead of Magical? It's a topic that's been needlessly discussed fewer times.

I hated negative rep.



#80 Sweeney

Sweeney
  • 1230 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2014 - 06:41 AM

I hated negative rep.


It's not coming back, don't worry :p

#81 Waser Lave

Waser Lave

  • 25516 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2014 - 06:53 AM

Can we make this thread about why negative rep needs to be reimplemented instead of Magical? It's a topic that's been needlessly discussed fewer times.

 

It's been tried several times. It's failed every time. It'll likely never come back.



#82 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2014 - 07:06 AM

Basically it was abused and nothing positive can come from it (weirdly enough...).

Why do you think Facebook doesn't allow dislikes?

#83 Ali

Ali
  • Wielder of the Spork

  • 3204 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2014 - 07:15 AM

It's still a more interesting topic than Magical.

#84 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2014 - 07:19 AM

So's your face!

Wait a minute...

#85 Magical

Magical
  • Banned from trading - Do not trade with this member!

  • 801 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2014 - 07:25 AM

It's still a more interesting topic than Magical.

 

BUT....BUT....!!!

 

Spoiler


Basically it was abused and nothing positive can come from it (weirdly enough...).

Why do you think Facebook doesn't allow dislikes?

 

YT should do the same tho. I swear all the trolls just negative rep



#86 Keil

Keil
  • Above Average Mediocrity

  • 6591 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2014 - 07:58 AM

NfJE3Sv.png



#87 Elindoril

Elindoril
  • Weeaboo Trash

  • 9254 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2014 - 08:10 AM

Meanwhile on Bizarro 'Codex...

The fight to bring back +Rep rages on. Bone battles vigilantly so people can give people a positive recognition for their actions instead of kicking people while they're down for their idiotic posts.

Everyone -Repped his posted and laughed at his futile efforts.

#88 Keil

Keil
  • Above Average Mediocrity

  • 6591 posts


Users Awards

Posted 02 September 2014 - 05:08 PM

As long as Facebook does not have a dislike button, we will never have -rep because codex is a clone of fb

 

List of times when NeoCodex can possibly re-implement negative rep:

 

Spoiler



#89 Keil

Keil
  • Above Average Mediocrity

  • 6591 posts


Users Awards

Posted 24 September 2014 - 06:43 PM

The UN is an example of ultimate collaboration of human law. NeoCodex is an absurdly miniscule speck by comparison. You can't compare how these two bodies of organizational function. It's like expecting a small town knitting club to have the same standards of military and politics as Russia. On top of that, the UN retroactive clause is about national or international law. We are discussing trade bans.

 

I repeat (since you failed to grasp it th first time), just can't you make that comparison from two things of vastly differing magnitudes.

 

Discusing human rights philosophy outside of poltical bodies is a different matter.



#90 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 24 September 2014 - 07:37 PM

It's a good idea to follow though, you can't discount something just because of size and stature.

#91 DonValentino

DonValentino
  • Neocodex Handegg League Champion/Daddy

  • 2482 posts


Users Awards

Posted 24 September 2014 - 07:49 PM

;)



#92 NapisaurusRex

NapisaurusRex
  • 🍴Aioli-American🍴

  • 9425 posts


Users Awards

Posted 25 September 2014 - 06:45 AM

@Magical



#93 Bone

Bone
  • no

  • 3638 posts


Users Awards

Posted 25 September 2014 - 06:57 AM

Would now be an appropriate time to discuss the merits of negrep?



#94 Frizzle

Frizzle
  • M'lord

  • 16889 posts


Users Awards

Posted 25 September 2014 - 07:00 AM

No

#95 Bone

Bone
  • no

  • 3638 posts


Users Awards

Posted 25 September 2014 - 07:05 AM

:(



#96 Bone

Bone
  • no

  • 3638 posts


Users Awards

Posted 25 September 2014 - 07:31 AM

Why would you do such a thing, why?????

 

 

WHY ARE YOU PUTTING PEOPLE THROUGH THIS, WHY?!



#97 Keil

Keil
  • Above Average Mediocrity

  • 6591 posts


Users Awards

Posted 25 September 2014 - 07:33 AM

If any of you want neg rep so badly, what don't you just rep every other message but the person who you would give the neg rep to? The person would suffer psychological damage via relative exclusion.



#98 Bone

Bone
  • no

  • 3638 posts


Users Awards

Posted 25 September 2014 - 07:34 AM

If any of you want neg rep so badly, what don't you just rep every other message but the person who you would give the neg rep to? The person would suffer psychological damage via relative exclusion.

 

But I want a faster and easier way to psychologically damage people!




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users