Virginity
#276
Posted 12 May 2005 - 10:50 AM
#277
Posted 12 May 2005 - 10:52 AM
#278
Posted 12 May 2005 - 10:52 AM
Look, I won't speak about education in country X, simply because I have no idea - but in Poland it sucks (if we can say it exists at all!), not to mention that it's corrupted by the RC church anywayHow would you suggest we're educated?
EDIT: Oh yeah, forgot to add that sex is generally considered a taboo in Poland, mostly thanks to the CENSORED CENSORED RC church
#279
Posted 12 May 2005 - 10:58 AM
#280
Posted 12 May 2005 - 10:59 AM
#281
Posted 12 May 2005 - 11:01 AM
#283
Posted 12 May 2005 - 11:05 AM
#284
Posted 12 May 2005 - 11:08 AM
#286
Posted 12 May 2005 - 11:14 AM
#287
Posted 12 May 2005 - 11:19 AM
#288
Posted 12 May 2005 - 11:20 AM
#289
Posted 18 May 2005 - 12:44 PM
HERE are some of the flaws:
1.) Relativists can't accuse anyone of doing something wrong. Why?- because that would then be saying that they are right. If a moral relativist is right, then EVERYONE is right. This of course, is contradictory.
2.) Relativists can't complain about or solve evil (because evil has a standard) Relativists think the holocaust was wrong, thus making the ones who did the holocaust WRONG. If their opinions are attacked, they say they are RIGHT.
3.) Relativists can't put blame or praises. This would imply a standard of right and wrong, good or bad, would it not?
4.) Relativists can't make charges of fairness or justice. This too would imply right and wrong, good and bad.
5.) Relativists can't improve themselves because there is 'no' absolute standard.
6.) Relativists can't hold a meaningful, moral discussion since there is no standard in which to hold it up to
7.) Relativists can't demand tolerence (If they do, that's attempting to force their opinion of tolerence on you, which of course, isn't tolerence for YOUR opinion of intolerence, and if there is no right and wrong, then you being intollerent is just as right as one being tolerent.)
TRUTH. There IS truth.
Murder and stealing and lying: all cultures agree it is wrong. Funny... if there is no absolute Truth.
Absolute morals: truth and morals whether you like it or not
So there IS an absolute truth about sex, which is an absolute moral. Sex is wrong outside of marriage whether anyone likes it or not.
#290
Posted 18 May 2005 - 12:54 PM
Prrrhh some gd points though.
And frizzle aint that bad and he can have sex with who he wants, when he wants, and where he wants. Its his own decision. (and this topic was uber old)
Edited by danupsher, 18 May 2005 - 12:55 PM.
#292
Posted 18 May 2005 - 08:56 PM
(wait, who was that directed at???) Therefore they have no right whatsover to say anything here. Besides, who the hell are they to decide what is ultimately right? A world dictator? The CENSOREDing pope? Because there aren't many other occupations that allow to easily change the moral standards of vast masses...6.) Relativists can't hold a meaningful, moral discussion since there is no standard in which to hold it up to
And what you said about that 'absolute' truth is just so CENSOREDing pointless... there are no absolute truths, everyone justifies their own opinions and views...
#293
Posted 18 May 2005 - 10:40 PM
#294
Posted 19 May 2005 - 02:34 AM
Keh. Wouldn't bother tryin' to convert you, and as I can see, you are a moral relativist... and as you probably will eventually figure out, there are WAY too many flaws in believing right and wrong are in opinion. Is the holocaust a right thing or a wrong thing? Is freedom to vote by women before 1920, wrong or right? Was slavery wrong or right?
HERE are some of the flaws:
1.) Relativists can't accuse anyone of doing something wrong. Why?- because that would then be saying that they are right. If a moral relativist is right, then EVERYONE is right. This of course, is contradictory.
2.) Relativists can't complain about or solve evil (because evil has a standard) Relativists think the holocaust was wrong, thus making the ones who did the holocaust WRONG. If their opinions are attacked, they say they are RIGHT.
3.) Relativists can't put blame or praises. This would imply a standard of right and wrong, good or bad, would it not?
4.) Relativists can't make charges of fairness or justice. This too would imply right and wrong, good and bad.
5.) Relativists can't improve themselves because there is 'no' absolute standard.
6.) Relativists can't hold a meaningful, moral discussion since there is no standard in which to hold it up to
7.) Relativists can't demand tolerence (If they do, that's attempting to force their opinion of tolerence on you, which of course, isn't tolerence for YOUR opinion of intolerence, and if there is no right and wrong, then you being intollerent is just as right as one being tolerent.)
TRUTH. There IS truth.
Murder and stealing and lying: all cultures agree it is wrong. Funny... if there is no absolute Truth.
Absolute morals: truth and morals whether you like it or not
So there IS an absolute truth about sex, which is an absolute moral. Sex is wrong outside of marriage whether anyone likes it or not.
Excuse me, but im picking up that you are trying to say that what you are saying is the "Absolute Truth"?
And who to are you suggesting this?
And is it just me, or is anyone else unable to percieve what she's saying?
#295
Posted 08 September 2010 - 10:47 AM
Let me rephrase that...
STOP THE FUKIN FIGHTS!!!!![]()
DON'T ASSUME. DON'T ACbecauseE
#296
Posted 08 September 2010 - 10:47 AM
Nice of you to bump a 5 year old thread...
#297
Posted 08 September 2010 - 10:48 AM
Nice of you to bump a 5 year old thread...
Common man it fit hardcore.
#298
Posted 08 September 2010 - 10:51 AM
(0-10 has some votes o.O)
#299
Posted 08 September 2010 - 12:28 PM
#300
Posted 08 September 2010 - 09:32 PM
On a side note, WTF ever happened to Sham? I miss that girl. Good ole girl from Texas... *sigh*
Hot Irish girl right?
Hmm
18 and still a virgin. If it doesn't happen in the next couple years I'll just become a monk
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



