Quantcast

What works and what is paused · Email is limited to account activation and password resets.

Jump to content


Photo

Ever wondered if we're seeing the same thing?


  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

#1 Sida

Sida
  • Tsvetesman

  • 3865 posts

Posted 01 August 2006 - 09:46 AM

This is something i thought about on a car journey once.

Take this colour for example. What colour is it? It's red.
But why do you call it red? It's because since you were born, you've been taught that whenever you see that colour, you call it red. But who's to say you're seeing the same colour as me?

This colour is blue. Like before, you've been taught to call this blue.
But who's to say we don't see the colours the other way round? We wouldn't know, as we'd name them exactly the same because that's what we learnt since we were young.

That could be one of the reasons why people have different favourite colours...right? One man's favourite colour might be red, and someone else's might be blue. But for all we know, they could infact like the exact same colour.


I have to admit, i did a few weeks later come up with something that would deem this theory invalid, but i'll leave that for you to think about wink.gif

Advertisement

    #2 dolphinbomb

    dolphinbomb
    • YAAAAAAYYYYY

    • 3759 posts

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 09:50 AM

    Taking it out of the colors context...

    Watch a group of people sometime.. Think about what they look like to you... now, take the role of one of those said people. Do they even notice you? What would you look like to them?
    What kind of impression do YOU leave on them?

    I often think about what others think of me and see of me. I often put myself into the shoes of others, usually just to kill boredom. I imagine what they're life is like, how they're feeling, and what they're seeing right at the moment.


    I know it's odd, but it's really interesting to do sometimes..

    #3 Sean

    Sean
    • 6188 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 09:53 AM

    I've thought about it, but then lost interest. tongue.gif

    #4 Amagius

    Amagius
    • 1117 posts

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 10:07 AM

    I've had the exact same thought, but based on philosophical standards, I have no reason to push further into the subject:

    1.) There is no way to prove it true or not.
    2.) Even if it was proven to be true, it would not effect life in anyway. If their isn't anything lost in translation in the state we are already at, there is no point to tear down the invisible wall because we could view it like they could.

    #5 Mumei

    Mumei
    • 3545 posts

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 10:07 AM

    I am not sure i quite understand what you're talking about

    we all experiance light waves hitting the back of our eyes in the same way - the same chemicals chemicals are produced, creating the same electrical impulses into the brain - from there it is a learned response to call it red or rouge, or akai etc...

    we are all prisoners of the ability to communicate our ideas (be that to ourselves, or to others) - if you cannot dream of an idea happening, you cannot make it happen.

    #6 Sida

    Sida
    • Tsvetesman

    • 3865 posts

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 10:26 AM

    QUOTE
    we all experiance light waves hitting the back of our eyes in the same way - the same chemicals chemicals are produced, creating the same electrical impulses into the brain - from there it is a learned response to call it red or rouge, or akai etc...


    But still, there's no way, that i know of, to prove that the light > electrical impulse conversion is the same. The chemicals created are the same, and the transfer of signals may be the same between everyone, but there's still no fixed way to prove that the end result is the same, unless our minds were to be transfered into another body, allowing us to personally see the world through another's eyes and prove it's the same.

    Edited by SidaZoid, 01 August 2006 - 10:56 AM.


    #7 Justin

    Justin
    • <img src ='http://i32.tinypic.com/302oyrp.jpg'>

    • 3595 posts

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 10:28 AM

    I've thought about this as well. But how about bright colors? They blind us and hurt our eyes >_>

    #8 Ilya

    Ilya
    • 2419 posts

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 10:28 AM

    When you were born they dont teach you to see red, they teach you that that color is called red..

    #9 Sida

    Sida
    • Tsvetesman

    • 3865 posts

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 10:56 AM

    QUOTE
    When you were born they dont teach you to see red, they teach you that that color is called red..


    That's exactly my point? They tought me and you that it's the colour Red...but we don't know we're seeing the same colour.

    QUOTE
    I've thought about this as well. But how about bright colors? They blind us and hurt our eyes >_>


    I like your way of thinking. See the part in the post saying i found a flaw? That's the exact thing i thought of tongue.gif

    #10 sonic

    sonic
    • 3452 posts

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 11:03 AM

    If you look at a red piece of paper, everyone in the world who is not colorblind will see red. We all experience the same effects of the light ray spectrum.

    #11 Sida

    Sida
    • Tsvetesman

    • 3865 posts

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 11:09 AM

    QUOTE(Sonic @ Aug 1 2006, 08:03 PM) View Post

    If you look at a red piece of paper, everyone in the world who is not colorblind will see red. We all experience the same effects of the light ray spectrum.


    Do you know that? Do you know that your eyes convert light to electrical impulses in the exact same way as someone elses? And that every step of the process is the same? We assume, not know.

    #12 Zeeky

    Zeeky
    • 410 posts

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 11:12 AM

    Me and my brother always have conversations about this when we are bored. tongue.gif It is really weird to think about things like that, like if my yellow was your green or something like that. I know it isn't so, scientists have proved that, but it is just a strange concept to think about.

    #13 Sida

    Sida
    • Tsvetesman

    • 3865 posts

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 11:19 AM

    Yeah, i mean obviously the chances are EXTREAMLY low, actually lower then that...but just the idea that there's always the possibility...

    #14 sonic

    sonic
    • 3452 posts

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 11:27 AM

    Listen. "color" is not realtive to the seer. "color" is used as a scientific tool. Think of how we measure the distance of far away objects in our universe. We use whats called the redshifted spectra. The closer the color of the light is to the red side of the spectrum, the farther away it is.

    Now I understand how someone who does not know much about particle physics and the laws the govern light could be confused and have the same logical thinking of you. No biggie. Go pick up a book, possibly QED(QuantamElectroDynamics) by Richard Feynman(spelling?) and read it. Or do something you should never do and just take my work for it. Or ask cassila, or even cataliste. They both along with me are quite knowledgable on the subject. Well cassila pwns us....you get the point....

    #15 Tim

    Tim
    • 2795 posts

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 11:33 AM

    I can't come up with a scientific explanation to why I don't think it's true, but here's a way that you could look at it that I think would make you think we all see the same. tongue.gif

    Signatures. If we all saw something different, then some of the signatures we see would look bizarre to some people and great to others. We don't have people going "OMG WHY DID U MIX THAT WIT THAT!!1!!" all the time (well, sometimes we do. rolleyes.gif), and others saying how great it looks. That's because we all see the same thing, with the same colors.

    Makes sense to me.

    Also, noone thinks that Darkness is a very bright skin, do they?

    Edited by Tim, 01 August 2006 - 11:39 AM.


    #16 Ives

    Ives
    • 4320 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 01:06 PM

    Color isn't much of a scientific tool, seeing as it depends from person to person as to what color is what. But certain scientists say that basically applies to science: Just modeling the world according to an opinion.

    #17 Random

    Random
    • 8199 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 01:08 PM

    I have thought about that before, I think its possible, but there would have to be some guidline so people know how to match things wink.gif

    I heard that everyone hears your voice at a different pitch also.

    #18 sonic

    sonic
    • 3452 posts

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 01:29 PM

    QUOTE(Athean @ Aug 1 2006, 02:06 PM) View Post

    Color isn't much of a scientific tool, seeing as it depends from person to person as to what color is what. But certain scientists say that basically applies to science: Just modeling the world according to an opinion.


    Lol
    http://www.astro.vir...ry/redshift.htm
    Owned....

    #19 Hawk

    Hawk
    • hawk·ish·ly

    • 9690 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 02:22 PM

    QUOTE(Sonic @ Aug 1 2006, 03:29 PM) View Post

    How is color a tool?

    "Can you hand me that color for a second?" o.o

    #20 sonic

    sonic
    • 3452 posts

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 02:26 PM

    QUOTE(hawk117 @ Aug 1 2006, 02:22 PM) View Post

    How is color a tool?

    "Can you hand me that color for a second?" o.o



    I will say it again
    QUOTE
    Now I understand how someone who does not know much about particle physics and the laws the govern light could be confused and have the same logical thinking of you.


    #21 Ives

    Ives
    • 4320 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 04:42 PM

    I'm not saying it isn't a tool, Sonic. I'm saying it is a tool under certain conditions. (:

    #22 Hawk

    Hawk
    • hawk·ish·ly

    • 9690 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 04:45 PM

    QUOTE(Athean @ Aug 1 2006, 06:42 PM) View Post

    I'm not saying it isn't a tool, Sonic. I'm saying it is a tool under certain conditions. (:

    And I just felt like being a smartass dry.gif. So Sonic, you convinced people to agree with you who already agreed with you. Dang that was a wordy sentance.

    #23 sonic

    sonic
    • 3452 posts

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 04:48 PM

    QUOTE(Athean @ Aug 1 2006, 04:42 PM) View Post

    I'm not saying it isn't a tool, Sonic. I'm saying it is a tool under certain conditions. (:


    Ah. That makes sense.

    Al I am trying to point out is that color is NOT relitive. There are scientifially set peramatures.


    #24 Hydrogen

    Hydrogen
    • Neocodex Co-Founder

    • 22213 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 04:49 PM

    What you guys are arguing about is something called qualia...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualia

    smile.gif

    #25 ink

    ink
    • 2189 posts

    Posted 01 August 2006 - 04:55 PM

    The only problem is when things are near the same. Like yellow, purple, red, and brown, look almost exactly the same to my father. They appear the same as gray also. In his vision they are pronounced as gray, since that is originally what he identified them by. Sometimes I have to help him at traffic lights.

    Indifference usually is due to eye damage though. Yet this is a very cool theory.


    1 user(s) are reading this topic

    0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users