I have this great avatar that I made a while back for an old forum and i just found it:
But it's 140x140. Bah! It looks crud muffins downsized.
Avatar Sizes
Started by Nick, Oct 24 2006 01:33 PM
-
This topic is locked
11 replies to this topic
#1
Nick
-
-
- 6051 posts
<img src="http://i29.tinypic.com/9iwl5w.jpg">
Posted 24 October 2006 - 01:33 PM
I have this great avatar that I made a while back for an old forum and i just found it:
But it's 140x140. Bah! It looks crud muffins downsized.
#2
Shin
-
-
- 1586 posts
Posted 24 October 2006 - 01:35 PM
I'm against raising the avatar size, but that's a pretty neat avatar you got there.
#3
Nick
-
-
- 6051 posts
<img src="http://i29.tinypic.com/9iwl5w.jpg">
Posted 24 October 2006 - 01:47 PM
Why are you against it?
#4
Mr. Hobo
-
-
- 8152 posts
Posted 24 October 2006 - 02:02 PM
He doesn't want other avatars intimidating his cup of coffee 
No offense to Java.
Increased avatar size wouldn't cause anything bad, it won't stretch out the posts or take up that much more bandwidth since lots of people use imageshack or something else so I don't really see why not
No offense to Java
. Increased avatar size wouldn't cause anything bad, it won't stretch out the posts or take up that much more bandwidth since lots of people use imageshack or something else so I don't really see why not
Edited by Mr. Hobo, 24 October 2006 - 02:03 PM.
#5
Charmender
-
-
- 4104 posts
Awesome
Posted 24 October 2006 - 02:22 PM
Here is it at 100x100 not lookin shitty
#6
Shin
-
-
- 1586 posts
Posted 24 October 2006 - 02:48 PM
QUOTE(Urban @ Oct 24 2006, 05:47 PM) 
Why are you against it?
I don't really find a need for bigger avatars. I think they will start to become too big once we increase the size too much. By the way, a thread was made about this a while ago:
http://www.neocodex....showtopic=52655
QUOTE(Mr. Hobo @ Oct 24 2006, 06:02 PM)
He doesn't want other avatars intimidating his cup of coffee
No offense to Java
. If anyone challenges my coffee cup, they will be properly punished.
QUOTE(CaluM @ Oct 24 2006, 06:22 PM)
Here is it at 100x100 not lookin shitty
That looks pretty nice. The wonders that you GFX people do... 
#7
Nick
-
-
- 6051 posts
<img src="http://i29.tinypic.com/9iwl5w.jpg">
Posted 25 October 2006 - 05:56 AM
It looks much better as a 140x140
There's no harm in increasing the avatar sizes.
There's no harm in increasing the avatar sizes.
#8
414de7fe6
-
-
- 2559 posts
Posted 25 October 2006 - 06:38 AM
Apparently there is, else the rule wouldn't be there in the first place now would it?
Never been any problems with avatar size in the couple of years i've been a resident at Codex, there's no point starting something about it now. It's not broken, so don't fix it.
Never been any problems with avatar size in the couple of years i've been a resident at Codex, there's no point starting something about it now. It's not broken, so don't fix it.
#9
Ilya
-
-
- 2419 posts
Posted 25 October 2006 - 07:23 AM
If we increase the avatar size to 150x150 or 140x140 it would be awesome I would be able to upload my chains wich look shitty as 100x100... 
differences:
differences:
Edited by Adobe, 25 October 2006 - 07:41 AM.
#10
Nick
-
-
- 6051 posts
<img src="http://i29.tinypic.com/9iwl5w.jpg">
Posted 25 October 2006 - 08:32 AM
Well your avatar doesn't even show up Euph it's just a box with an [x] so I can see why you wouldn't care.
#11
414de7fe6
-
-
- 2559 posts
Posted 25 October 2006 - 05:56 PM
I shouldn't have an avatar. Thanks for pointing that out.
And if you scale things properly, they look just as good (if not better) scaled.
And if you scale things properly, they look just as good (if not better) scaled.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
