. I just wanted to know how you guys are doing with the server load errors. Have you been getting a lot of them? I've been monitoring the server load averages and they dont seem to go high enough to give an error whenever I look.
How are the server load errors?
Started by Hydrogen, Dec 14 2006 02:31 PM
57 replies to this topic
#1
Hydrogen
-
-
- 22213 posts
Neocodex Co-Founder
Posted 14 December 2006 - 02:31 PM
. I just wanted to know how you guys are doing with the server load errors. Have you been getting a lot of them? I've been monitoring the server load averages and they dont seem to go high enough to give an error whenever I look.
#2
Hawk
-
-
- 9690 posts
hawk·ish·ly
Posted 14 December 2006 - 02:32 PM
QUOTE(Hydrogen @ Dec 14 2006, 04:31 PM) 
Hey everyone . I just wanted to know how you guys are doing with the server load errors. Have you been getting a lot of them? I've been monitoring the server load averages and they dont seem to go high enough to give an error whenever I look.
. I just wanted to know how you guys are doing with the server load errors. Have you been getting a lot of them? I've been monitoring the server load averages and they dont seem to go high enough to give an error whenever I look.Havent had a single one since the update.
First post XD
#3
Gargar
-
-
- 4901 posts
Posted 14 December 2006 - 02:33 PM
I haven't had 1 in the past 2 days but on monday i had it for like a half an hour straight.
#4
Mr. Hobo
-
-
- 8152 posts
Posted 14 December 2006 - 02:38 PM
QUOTE(Gargar @ Dec 14 2006, 05:33 PM)
I haven't had 1 in the past 2 days but on monday i had it for like a half an hour straight.
Same. Codex is loading nice and fast
#6
Eeyore
-
-
- 7908 posts
<img src ='http://i34.tinypic.com/2mecsg1.jpg'>
Posted 14 December 2006 - 02:47 PM
Haven't had one the past couple of days but I've not been browsing like normal because of my small gfx fad.
#7
Tetiel
-
-
- 11533 posts
Posted 14 December 2006 - 02:48 PM
Oddly enough... I haven't seen any lately. Anything special happen?
#8
Hydrogen
-
-
- 22213 posts
Neocodex Co-Founder
Posted 14 December 2006 - 02:53 PM
It's good to hear that you guys haven't had one in a while. The obvious method of thinking is that if we restrict the server load to only go up so high and give an error otherwise is that the board will always give that error because our server load is so high. However, after you do a little more thinking into the subject, you will see that while the error is up, it allows the server to clear up its backlog and return to its normal fast rate. If we just stop our queries for a little while, we can let the server handle the previous queries and calm down before taking more queries rather than just add to the backlog and make the server go even more crazy 
.
In short, nothing special has happened, but the server load restrictions are working the way they are supposed to be working. All in all, you get a much faster Neocodex.
.In short, nothing special has happened, but the server load restrictions are working the way they are supposed to be working. All in all, you get a much faster Neocodex
.
#9
Fatal
-
-
- 3625 posts
Posted 14 December 2006 - 03:27 PM
yea havent had any yet either looks like the update fixed it
looks like the update fixed it
#10
Redblade
-
-
- 1459 posts
Posted 14 December 2006 - 03:44 PM
had a few on wednesday evening and couple on yesterday evening.(GMT) None today. Hope that bodes well. 
#11
Kyle
-
-
- 2082 posts
Legit.
Posted 14 December 2006 - 03:50 PM
Haven't had any since the update, and Codex is loading wonderfully!
#12
Tim
-
-
- 2795 posts
Posted 14 December 2006 - 03:54 PM
None in the last couple of days.
Thank god, I was about to kill someone.
Thank god, I was about to kill someone.
#15
ShadowLink64
-
-
- 16735 posts
Posted 14 December 2006 - 06:43 PM
Awesome. It could have been that the topic views thing brought some of the CPU down?
It could have been that the topic views thing brought some of the CPU down?
#17
Hydrogen
-
-
- 22213 posts
Neocodex Co-Founder
Posted 14 December 2006 - 06:44 PM
QUOTE(ShadowLink64 @ Dec 14 2006, 06:43 PM)
Awesome. It could have been that the topic views thing brought some of the CPU down?
maybe and i did some optimizations earlier today so hopefully nothing bad will happen It could have been that the topic views thing brought some of the CPU down?
#19
Grizzly
-
-
- 3964 posts
<img src ='http://i29.tinypic.com/9iwl5w.jpg'>
Posted 14 December 2006 - 07:02 PM
Yeah it seems revolved for now. None so far for me neither.
#20
dolphinbomb
-
-
- 3759 posts
YAAAAAAYYYYY
Posted 14 December 2006 - 07:09 PM
I've seen a few, but that's possibly because I constantly click the "NeoCodex" button on my bookmark toolbar on FF whenever I'm bored.. 
#21
pyke
-
-
- 13686 posts
Posted 14 December 2006 - 07:15 PM
QUOTE(dolphinbomb @ Dec 14 2006, 11:09 PM)
I've seen a few, but that's possibly because I constantly click the "NeoCodex" button on my bookmark toolbar on FF whenever I'm bored..
Yor're single handedly responsible for our downtimes!
#23
Rush
-
-
- 1812 posts
Posted 15 December 2006 - 10:27 AM
Just had one, in less than five minutes of surfing through the board. ._.
#24
Posted 15 December 2006 - 10:35 AM
Same, I had one about half hour ago, it went on for 10minutes.
#25
sarah.
-
-
- 5392 posts
Posted 15 December 2006 - 10:36 AM
I've had them for hours, though it randomly works occasionally for a few minutes.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
