Quantcast

What works and what is paused · Email is limited to account activation and password resets.

Jump to content


Photo

saddam 2 b execute within next few hours


  • Please log in to reply
96 replies to this topic

#1 nox

nox
  • 6707 posts


Users Awards

Posted 29 December 2006 - 04:12 PM

can't fathom what he must be thinking right now, o well sux2bim

i know we had a topic about this already but now the time has come, any changed / new opinions?

Edited by speaker, 29 December 2006 - 04:12 PM.


Advertisement

    #2 Frizzle

    Frizzle
    • M'lord

    • 16889 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 04:13 PM

    Worse people out there then Saddam Huessien.


    Like the cheeky girls.

    #3 Greeny

    Greeny
    • 603 posts

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 04:15 PM

    Now his sadam bin captured! Now they have to find osama. And a few years ago, I was logged on on msn,a nd my brother for some reason was looking up bombs and shit on ebay, and I got an email about it lol, they nearly found me out!

    #4 Kyle

    Kyle
    • Legit.

    • 2082 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 04:16 PM

    QUOTE(Frizzle @ Dec 29 2006, 06:13 PM) View Post
    Worse people out there then Saddam Huessien.

    Definitely, considering he had nothing to do with 9/11, the sole reason we're in the middle East.

    #5 SupermanFTM

    SupermanFTM
    • 5817 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 04:16 PM

    Eh, I can't really say much except he'll get what he set himself up for. Not that I agree or disagree with it, but it's what happens smile.gif

    #6 Bryan

    Bryan
    • 4107 posts

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 04:24 PM

    This topic title strangely reminded me of the movie Borat.

    But, I honestly see no reason why the deal with Saddam is so widespread. Honestly, he hasn't affected my life, in a negative or positive way.

    #7 Noitidart

    Noitidart
    • Neocodex Co-Founder

    • 23214 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 04:30 PM

    What happend to that Serbian guy Millosovich for Kosovo did he get executed?

    #8 Tetiel

    Tetiel
    • 11533 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 04:36 PM

    QUOTE(Noitidart @ Dec 29 2006, 06:30 PM) View Post
    What happend to that Serbian guy Millosovich for Kosovo did he get executed?

    He died in prison, Noit. Heart condition, I believe. He was to be excecuted as well though I think. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    #9 RandomNameIgnoreIt

    RandomNameIgnoreIt
    • 1828 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 04:43 PM

    QUOTE(Bryan @ Dec 29 2006, 07:24 PM) View Post
    This topic title strangely reminded me of the movie Borat.


    Ahaha... after reading that I thought of Borat saying the topic title and it's great.

    Anyway, I think this is great news. It needs to be done with as quick as can be. There may be some increased attacks in the short-run but once he's gone, overtime at least some of the resistance will tire and give up. The Baath people at least. Assuming we withdraw eventually...

    #10 Brad

    Brad
    • How about a magic trick?

    • 4565 posts

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 04:46 PM

    QUOTE(Tetiel @ Dec 29 2006, 08:36 PM) View Post
    He died in prison, Noit. Heart condition, I believe. He was to be excecuted as well though I think. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    he died just before the trial ended.

    #11 Tetiel

    Tetiel
    • 11533 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 04:51 PM

    QUOTE(Brad @ Dec 29 2006, 06:46 PM) View Post
    he died just before the trial ended.

    Oh yes, right. Well he WAS going to be excecuted (so I heard, looked like it anyways) tongue.gif

    #12 Noitidart

    Noitidart
    • Neocodex Co-Founder

    • 23214 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 05:38 PM

    Then saddam should be executed too. Same situation.

    #13 nox

    nox
    • 6707 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 05:53 PM

    QUOTE(Bryan @ Dec 29 2006, 07:24 PM) View Post
    This topic title strangely reminded me of the movie Borat.

    haha yeah i was trying to hint at that tongue.gif

    #14 Justin

    Justin
    • <img src ='http://i32.tinypic.com/302oyrp.jpg'>

    • 3595 posts

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 05:57 PM

    QUOTE(jocxo @ Dec 29 2006, 08:51 PM) View Post
    poor guy sad.gif , like mentioned, there are worse people around, available for this kinda stuff 1we8.gif

    Ok. Lets not kill him and wait till we can find the people worse than him, then kill them.

    0k makes sense.

    #15 nox

    nox
    • 6707 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 06:00 PM

    QUOTE(jocxo @ Dec 29 2006, 08:51 PM) View Post
    poor guy sad.gif , like mentioned, there are worse people around, available for this kinda stuff 1we8.gif

    like u

    #16 Melchoire

    Melchoire
    • 5284 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 06:11 PM

    If they're gonna kill Saddam why not just kill Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. They're as much an asshole as Saddam is dry.gif

    #17 nox

    nox
    • 6707 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 06:14 PM

    QUOTE(xėnon @ Dec 29 2006, 09:11 PM) View Post
    If they're gonna kill Saddam why not just kill Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. They're as much an asshole as Saddam is dry.gif

    good point! i can really see why you came to that conclusion.

    #18 Freddy

    Freddy
    • 5500 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 06:24 PM

    xD
    I guess the Bush's didn't kill as many people as Saddam.
    Maybe somebody will find a way lol.

    #19 Kyle

    Kyle
    • Legit.

    • 2082 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 06:37 PM

    QUOTE(Balmung @ Dec 29 2006, 07:57 PM) View Post
    Ok. Lets not kill him and wait till we can find the people worse than him, then kill them.

    0k makes sense.

    No, the point I was making is that our resources shouldn't have been spent searching for Saddam. The "War Against Terror" was a result of 9/11, an event that Saddam had no connection to. The war on terror is a war against terrorists, not corrupt leaders. No Weapons of Mass Destruction+No Enriched Uranium+No terrorist connections to 9/11=Terrorist? I think not.

    That being said, I do not condone anything he has done. Im just saying that if the American government were looking for who they were suppost to be, we might have a real terrorist, Bin Laden, in custody.

    #20 Justin

    Justin
    • <img src ='http://i32.tinypic.com/302oyrp.jpg'>

    • 3595 posts

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 06:39 PM

    QUOTE(KyleBigMac @ Dec 29 2006, 09:37 PM) View Post
    No, the point I was making is that our resources shouldn't have been spent searching for Saddam. The "War Against Terror" was a result of 9/11, an event that Saddam had no connection to. The war on terror is a war against terrorists, not corrupt leaders. No Weapons of Mass Destruction+No Enriched Uranium+No terrorist connections to 9/11=Terrorist? I think not.

    That being said, I do not condone anything he has done. Im just saying that if the American government were looking for who they were suppost to be, we might have a real terrorist, Bin Laden, in custody.

    I didn't quote you. I was quoting jocxo. And that is not what he said.

    #21 nox

    nox
    • 6707 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 06:39 PM

    QUOTE(KyleBigMac @ Dec 29 2006, 09:37 PM) View Post
    No, the point I was making is that our resources shouldn't have been spent searching for Saddam. The "War Against Terror" was a result of 9/11, an event that Saddam had no connection to. The war on terror is a war against terrorists, not corrupt leaders. No Weapons of Mass Destruction+No Enriched Uranium+No terrorist connections to 9/11=Terrorist? I think not.

    That being said, I do not condone anything he has done. Im just saying that if the American government were looking for who they were suppost to be, we might have a real terrorist, Bin Laden, in custody.

    balmung wasn't replying to you...lol

    #22 Kyle

    Kyle
    • Legit.

    • 2082 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 06:42 PM

    QUOTE(Balmung @ Dec 29 2006, 08:39 PM) View Post
    I didn't quote you. I was quoting jocxo. And that is not what he said.

    He basically made the same point I did though. You took it as we shouldn't kill him until we've killed worse people (sarcastically of course), and I was trying to clarify what Jocxo, as well as what I said.

    #23 nox

    nox
    • 6707 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 06:46 PM

    he is responsible for thousands of deaths, how much more qualified do you need to be?

    does he deserve it? yes. do i believe in the death penalty? no

    #24 nox

    nox
    • 6707 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 06:53 PM

    QUOTE(jocxo @ Dec 29 2006, 09:49 PM) View Post
    hes being hanged cuz he is reponsible for the death of 148 shits...that he caused thousands of others deaths isnt his problem...i think ó.ó

    148 shits? huh



    #25 Ilya

    Ilya
    • 2419 posts

    Posted 29 December 2006 - 06:58 PM

    big mistake... we was just a leader of his country... 1we8.gif


    1 user(s) are reading this topic

    0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users