New Warn Policy
Started by ShadowLink64, Feb 11 2007 07:46 PM
35 replies to this topic
#27
Hawk
-
-
- 9690 posts
hawk·ish·ly
Posted 12 February 2007 - 04:54 PM
QUOTE(Kitsune @ Feb 12 2007, 06:33 PM) 
Sorry to burst your bubble but this has been worked on for quite a while now, not to mention it wasn't SL who brought this up when it was posted.
How long is quite a while?
#28
Hawk
-
-
- 9690 posts
hawk·ish·ly
Posted 12 February 2007 - 05:19 PM
QUOTE(Kitsune @ Feb 12 2007, 07:12 PM)
A month ago.
Well, its great to know the staff and noobcakes are on the same page xD
#29
nox
-
-
- 6707 posts
Posted 12 February 2007 - 05:21 PM
QUOTE(Kitsune @ Feb 12 2007, 07:33 PM)
Sorry to burst your bubble but this has been worked on for quite a while now, not to mention it wasn't SL who brought this up when it was posted.
ggnore
#30
Hydrogen
-
-
- 22213 posts
Neocodex Co-Founder
Posted 12 February 2007 - 07:42 PM
QUOTE(Kitsune @ Feb 12 2007, 03:19 AM)
The rule isn't going to be retrospective. However if you go up to 50% for example, I'm not sure quite what would happen, whether you'd start off at a 12 hour, or straight into a 4 day. I'm sure someone will come along and clarify though as I couldn't get hold of an admin
You could have let him be happy and not burst his bubble and nothing bad would have happened 
.Also, the rule is not post-facto so any warns you have incurred do not get a suspension along with them.
#31
Hawk
-
-
- 9690 posts
hawk·ish·ly
Posted 13 February 2007 - 01:02 PM
QUOTE(Kitsune @ Feb 13 2007, 02:03 AM)
(oh btw Hawk, I'm not, nor was I getting at you, you just happened bring it up, I was probably guilty of thinking similarly before I could see all that goes on haha)
Thanks for clearing that up.
It just seems like nothing really happens until:
A) A major event sparks it
---(Calum stirring shit up)
B) People complain about it
---(Like me complaining about Calum- I think banning of repeat offenders should be considered, especially with the old rules, Calum being suspended twice in such a short time is not a good thing)
C) The general population agrees with it
---(Closing registrations, demoting Priv, etc.)
Edited by Hawk, 13 February 2007 - 01:02 PM.
#32
Ilya
-
-
- 2419 posts
Posted 13 February 2007 - 02:19 PM
hmmm good idea.. not like get 50% warning and have no suspension or anything...
#34
Kail
-
-
- 1109 posts
Posted 11 April 2007 - 05:04 PM
Fair and just system but the time zones make it unfair. As i had to wait and extra 9 hours after the ban had finished in my country.
#35
Icey Defeat
-
-
- 8298 posts
Posted 11 April 2007 - 05:06 PM
I guess this doesn't condone gravedigging. However, I guess that gives you extra time to appeal the warn.
#36
Ryd3rX
-
-
- 167 posts
<img src='http://www.neocodex.us/forum/style_images/mem_plates/100post.gif'>
Posted 11 April 2007 - 05:30 PM
QUOTE(Popii @ Apr 11 2007, 05:04 PM)
Fair and just system but the time zones make it unfair. As i had to wait and extra 9 hours after the ban had finished in my country.
Just dont break the rules and there should be no problem!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
