The Beatles - who is your favorite beatle?
Started by jzbone2, Feb 13 2007 04:59 PM
15 replies to this topic
#1
jzbone2
-
-
- 91 posts
Posted 13 February 2007 - 04:59 PM
#2
Frizzle
-
-
- 16889 posts
M'lord
Posted 13 February 2007 - 05:00 PM
They're all shit in my opinion. Just don't get what's so good about them, they're mediocre at best.
#3
jzbone2
-
-
- 91 posts
Posted 13 February 2007 - 05:06 PM
QUOTE(Frizzle @ Feb 13 2007, 05:00 PM) 
They're all shit in my opinion. Just don't get what's so good about them, they're mediocre at best.
argh;
narrowminded bastard. =\
#4
Tetiel
-
-
- 11533 posts
Posted 13 February 2007 - 05:09 PM
QUOTE(Frizzle @ Feb 13 2007, 07:00 PM)
They're all shit in my opinion. Just don't get what's so good about them, they're mediocre at best.
Because they did LSD and wrote songs about it. Plus we all know John Lennon is dreeeeeeeeeamy
Anyways how come no one loves Ringo?
#5
Random
-
-
- 8199 posts
Posted 13 February 2007 - 05:09 PM
QUOTE(jzbone2 @ Feb 13 2007, 08:06 PM)
argh;
narrowminded bastard. =\
narrowminded bastard. =\
He's not narrowminded. Actually giving them the chance to suck is open minded since most people like them.
#6
dolphinbomb
-
-
- 3759 posts
YAAAAAAYYYYY
Posted 13 February 2007 - 05:13 PM
The Beatles were "revolutionary" and "amazing" for their time
Anymore, they're just another broken-up classic band that get's way too much hype.
So, no. Frizzle is not a narrow-minded bastard. The Beatles have had their time in the spotlight, and quite frankly, 95% of their music sucks.
Anymore, they're just another broken-up classic band that get's way too much hype.
So, no. Frizzle is not a narrow-minded bastard. The Beatles have had their time in the spotlight, and quite frankly, 95% of their music sucks.
#7
Frizzle
-
-
- 16889 posts
M'lord
Posted 13 February 2007 - 05:29 PM
What acutally stands out about them now?
I prefer electronic music anyway.
I prefer electronic music anyway.
#9
redlion
-
-
- 12072 posts
I don't exist!
Posted 17 February 2007 - 09:33 PM
George. Because he put up with everyone else's shit while still finding time to jam with Clapton, Hendrix, and the like. Here comes the sun was half Harrison and half Clapton, after they walked into a garden and talked for half an hour.
Because hes ugly.
QUOTE(Tetiel @ Feb 13 2007, 07:09 PM)
Because they did LSD and wrote songs about it. Plus we all know John Lennon is dreeeeeeeeeamy
Anyways how come no one loves Ringo?
Anyways how come no one loves Ringo?
Because hes ugly.
#11
rcadble
-
-
- 651 posts
Posted 24 February 2007 - 09:51 AM
IDK, Ringo Starr sounds the least cheesy when he sings, as you can hear on sgt. peppers.
#13
Jaf
-
-
- 1654 posts
Posted 24 February 2007 - 10:41 AM
I got hooked on Beatles after that new "Love" album.. STRAWBERRY FIELDS 4 EVAH
I think Ringo rocks, he also paints crappy paintings too.
http://www.go-star.c...ringo_starr.htm
I think Ringo rocks, he also paints crappy paintings too.
http://www.go-star.c...ringo_starr.htm
#14
Silk
-
-
- 6906 posts
Posted 24 February 2007 - 10:53 AM
Personally I think the Beatles are absolute shit, but I like Paul because of how much he does for protesting against animal cruelty.
#15
Warlord
-
-
- 3988 posts
Posted 24 February 2007 - 01:43 PM
QUOTE(Zulfi @ Feb 24 2007, 12:53 PM)
Personally I think the Beatles are absolute shit, but I like Paul because of how much he does for protesting against animal cruelty.
Touche
otherwise Beetle Bailey
#16
traderonline
-
-
- 5 posts
Posted 06 March 2007 - 01:35 PM
I like the whole group in common. no preference 
Elvis sounds better
Elvis sounds better
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
