23 replies to this topic

[Master_Rach]

My programs seem to be working fine, including the below:
Cellblock AP (codex)
Scarab 21 AP (off-site)
Vince's AA (codex)
Cliff Hanger AP (codex)
NAdvanced Refresher (off-site)
US-Ab (off-site)

But nothing else seems to be, it is scary. O.o

[Cataliste]

I was wondering the exact same thing. I went and looked at NeoPet's first login page and it looked unchanged. If I had an usable I would check the rest. I am very curious as to whether it still works or not.

[Waser Lave]

My logins still work fine.

[Cataliste]

Maybe all these new people are too retarded to know how to work a login?

I have already seen a few new members I would like to selectively "remove" form the gene pool.

[Master_Rach]

Yes, but some (many) programs give the same error when you try to log in:

Run-time error '13':

Type mismatch

It'll come up after you try to login, and then click OKay the program closes.
That error is given on the scarab 21 ap on this site, and the petpet adopter.

And some others.

Outdated wrapper maybe?

Because a lot of other programs work for me, like the ones I listed in first most

[Cataliste]

Possibly something else changed?

Something these programs is trying to get is no longer there. Possibly a GSB on somehting that changed. Maybe code around NP/Username/Petname has changed?

[Master_Rach]

The post programming I understand is a basic refresher, I can't go beyond that...

So don't ask me.

Either way, I still have the cliffhanger AP, so paintbrushes for money/eheh. XD

[Icey Defeat]

Maybe all these new people are too retarded to know how to work a login?

I have already seen a few new members I would like to selectively "remove" form the gene pool.

Its the wrapper coding I fixed it minutes after it first came out.

[Cataliste]

What exactly was wrong with it Icey?

[Master_Rach]

As a member, I have this to say:

UPDATE THE PROGRAMS WITH THE NEW WRAPPER ALL. >_>
thx

[Waser Lave]

As a member, I have this to say:

UPDATE THE PROGRAMS WITH THE NEW WRAPPER ALL. >_>
thx

So people like you can come here and use them all without contributing anything back?

Great idea.

[Master_Rach]

I was kidding...

*sniffle*

Edited by Master_Rach, 07 March 2007 - 10:07 AM.

[Master_Rach]

I didnt demand anything, I screamed a request.



Thanks anyway.

[Icey Defeat]

What exactly was wrong with it Icey?

Since Padora told me codex is the only site with the knowledge yet... im gonna keep it semi private lol.

[Hydrogen]

Since Padora told me codex is the only site with the knowledge yet... im gonna keep it semi private lol.

Isn't it out in the open in the programming area though when someone reported it? Or was that further up in the sections?

And where did you put the fixed source?

[ArchAngel.]

He posted it somewhere in the programming source...
It was just a fix for one of the wrapper functions.
Gj on finding that...

One thing though... To fix it for the users that are using the current programs, can't we just update the Run-Time and registry files that they have to download with the new wrapper, because they have to dl the Wrapper control anyway, so just fix it there and they don't have to worry about it.

[Icey Defeat]

He posted it somewhere in the programming source...
It was just a fix for one of the wrapper functions.
Gj on finding that...

One thing though... To fix it for the users that are using the current programs, can't we just update the Run-Time and registry files that they have to download with the new wrapper, because they have to dl the Wrapper control anyway, so just fix it there and they don't have to worry about it.

Nope gotta remake all programs.

[Hydrogen]

Nope gotta remake all programs.

For the future we should look into some way to make these types of things external so that they only have to download an update and older programs will continue to work .

[ArchAngel.]

Yeah, I just realized that was a stupid questions, since the function is the in the control's module, which is embedded in the exe and not part of the library files... *Breathe's deep*

Well...
If people were required to submit an uncompiled program and a compiled program, then we could just go through and fix it all ourselves.
Oh well...
You guys just have to clean out the programs section.

-Hydro, I solved your problem.

Edited by ArchAngel., 07 March 2007 - 05:09 PM.

[Waser Lave]

For the future we should look into some way to make these types of things external so that they only have to download an update and older programs will continue to work .

Just have the wrapper as an ocx or a dll and it should work i think. As long as the functions aren't changed thoroughly.

[travis]

Padora's are still offline

[Hydrogen]

Padora's are still offline

He has updated them ... they are just in QA . They should be accepted soon .

[ArchAngel.]

Of course his are still offline...
He's too busy botting for referrals at this time.

-edit...
damn hydro's too fast. xD

Edited by ArchAngel., 07 March 2007 - 06:28 PM.

[Hydrogen]

Of course his are still offline...
He's too busy botting for referrals at this time.

-edit...
damn hydro's too fast. xD

It's why I have a reputation .