I have nothing to say to this.
Man Gets Probation for Sex With Dead Deer
#1
Posted 23 March 2007 - 12:12 PM
#3
Posted 23 March 2007 - 12:23 PM
#5
Posted 23 March 2007 - 12:28 PM
"He was found guilty in April 2005 of felony mistreatment of an animal after he killed a horse with the intention of having sex with it."
That really is strange
#7
Posted 23 March 2007 - 12:41 PM
#9
Posted 23 March 2007 - 12:47 PM
I want to hear a probing analysis of his psyche, that's why we keep experts like you kicking around, for occasions like these...
It's because he wasn't breast-fed as a child so to make up for the lack of attention given to him by his mother, he has to get physical love from carrion.
Better?
#12
Posted 23 March 2007 - 12:58 PM
Man getting killed for fucking other men or man getting sentenced for fucking a horse and deer. Both are nasty and both generated some interest. K?
#14
Posted 23 March 2007 - 01:05 PM
Well it seems like a lot of weird things are slowly getting accepted by society. Maybe the deer thing will be alright in 10-20 years?
#15
Posted 23 March 2007 - 01:08 PM
Anyways... what disturbs me is that he is not like the typical necrophiliacs. Instead he is a necrophile who seems to get off in destroying things. He killed the horse previously and while it doesn't say in the article, I assume he killed the deer as well. Then he proceeded to defile the animals. The fact that he did kill the animals and the fact that he didn't have sex with them while they were alive gives the impression that he desires sexually the death and destruction of things. And then instead of mastrubating, he chooses to have sex with the animals. I believe there is a reason he does this with animals instead of humans as he believes them to be not as worthy as humans. Either that or he wishes not to get a murder charge. It could go either way.
Is that enough? I've not even completed my first psychology class yet
#17
Posted 23 March 2007 - 01:21 PM
The.
Hell.
Is.
This.
World.
Coming.
To?
edit: typo
Edited by Black Flame, 23 March 2007 - 04:03 PM.
#18
Posted 23 March 2007 - 02:10 PM
Anyways... what disturbs me is that he is not like the typical necrophiliacs. Instead he is a necrophile who seems to get off in destroying things. He killed the horse previously and while it doesn't say in the article, I assume he killed the deer as well. Then he proceeded to defile the animals. The fact that he did kill the animals and the fact that he didn't have sex with them while they were alive gives the impression that he desires sexually the death and destruction of things. And then instead of mastrubating, he chooses to have sex with the animals. I believe there is a reason he does this with animals instead of humans as he believes them to be not as worthy as humans. Either that or he wishes not to get a murder charge. It could go either way.
Is that enough? I've not even completed my first psychology class yet
Much more interesting
The.
Hell.
Is.
This.
World.
Coming.
Too?
*To
#19
Posted 23 March 2007 - 03:10 PM
#20
Posted 23 March 2007 - 04:00 PM
Oh whoops
Maybe he wasn't satisfied with just his girlfriend?
But seriously, I agree with you. It's just so wrong
#21
Posted 23 March 2007 - 04:03 PM
#22
Posted 23 March 2007 - 04:05 PM
#23
Posted 23 March 2007 - 04:07 PM
#24
Posted 23 March 2007 - 04:15 PM
#25
Posted 23 March 2007 - 04:16 PM
disturbing.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



