New Member Rank
#26
Posted 27 February 2008 - 08:06 PM
#27
Posted 27 February 2008 - 08:10 PM
#28
Posted 27 February 2008 - 08:14 PM
And maybe a couple moved to from advanced to the 1k rank... But it'd be more likely that future programs would be distributed into the different ranks rather than altering the existing access.
It's all dependant on the results at this stage
Personally I can't decide. I think 200-300 posts is deserving of some recognition, but in saying that... I also think 500 and 1000 are achievements worthy of celebrating (for lack of a more appropriate term). I think I still need to think some more on what I like. It's between option 2 and 4.
Oh and if anyone has any really appropriate and cool names for retired, post them as well. Sure can't hurt and retired isn't exactly representative
Would you totally hate me if I said I'm starting to agree with you more and more?
#29
Posted 27 February 2008 - 08:34 PM
I don't think 200 posts is too much, but maybe that's because I'm not new. *shrug*
I don't happen to have any good names for the 1000 posts member...
Also, I think if you guys make an 'intermediate' member, you should make it 250 posts.. half of 500 to make it even.
#30
Posted 27 February 2008 - 08:49 PM
I don't think 200 posts is too much, but maybe that's because I'm not new. *shrug*
I don't happen to have any good names for the 1000 posts member...
Also, I think if you guys make an 'intermediate' member, you should make it 250 posts.. half of 500 to make it even.
My idea for 1k is Neocodex God (as brought up in staff) but some members thing its too religious
#31
Posted 27 February 2008 - 08:51 PM
I usually only get angry at situations not at people with a select few exceptions.
Only starting to is because I feel like you disagree with me 100%
#32
Posted 27 February 2008 - 08:52 PM
I usually only get angry at situations not at people with a select few exceptions.
Am I an exception?
I thought of a name for retired! Elitists! We all know you have a superiority complex.
#33
Posted 27 February 2008 - 08:57 PM
#34
Posted 27 February 2008 - 09:10 PM
#35
Posted 27 February 2008 - 09:21 PM
Mmm I don't know... 1000 posts wouldn't seem to merit someone with the name of a 'god.'
It's really not -that- many.
Mehh. I don't know. I think maybe retired members could be the gods.
#36
Posted 27 February 2008 - 09:49 PM
And I've liked heaps of your ideas. PotW a major one of yours I like. Only thing I remember recently where I outright disagreed with you was the AB...
PotW I want that implemented
It's really not -that- many.
Mehh. I don't know. I think maybe retired members could be the gods.
1k is a lot of posts though Codex has been around a long time, a lot of people forget that.
Codex has 178 members (as of this post) with 1k posts. That's not many if you consider 15k+ members. That's pretty significant.
#37
Posted 27 February 2008 - 10:37 PM
No way. If I was retired, I'd much prefer being called a twat.
The tag should be neon sparkly pink, too. Make it as obnoxious as possible.
#38
Posted 27 February 2008 - 11:10 PM
If forced to choose, I'd say keep the regular system. One needs not fix what is not broken .
EDIT : LAWL, Somebody already sade the quotation. Guess it's THAT common.
Edited by The Defier, 28 February 2008 - 01:53 AM.
#39
Posted 27 February 2008 - 11:19 PM
#40
Posted 27 February 2008 - 11:34 PM
Advanced > Private
#41
Posted 28 February 2008 - 12:13 AM
#42
Posted 28 February 2008 - 05:18 AM
Sunscorch as a god? Heck yes.
But uh, I'm kind of newish compared to the rest of you, so I dunno if my opinion counts at all (I hope it would. D: ) but I kind of like things the way they are. 500 posts from nothing makes newer members actually have to show some effort and work their way up, it certainly weeds the leechers from actual potential members of the community. If there was a little rank at just 200 posts it wouldn't seem all that special when they finally reach 500.
I voted for no change, but whatever happens I'll deal with it, lmao.
#43
Posted 28 February 2008 - 11:17 AM
I voted for option 3 it seemed fair enough.
#44
Posted 28 February 2008 - 11:53 AM
#45
Posted 28 February 2008 - 12:33 PM
Pfffft, no. Our tags are SO cooler than yours.
#46
Posted 28 February 2008 - 12:48 PM
#47
Posted 28 February 2008 - 01:19 PM
Normal - 4%
Intermediate - 7%
Advanced - 10% etc......
and retired can be changed to energeticaly challenged
#48
Posted 28 February 2008 - 03:00 PM
#49
Posted 28 February 2008 - 03:06 PM
#50
Posted 28 February 2008 - 04:21 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users