Quantcast

What works and what is paused · Email is limited to account activation and password resets.

Jump to content


Photo

free $63


  • Please log in to reply
85 replies to this topic

#1 nox

nox
  • 6707 posts


Users Awards

Posted 10 March 2008 - 07:29 PM

http://www.airborneh...ubmitClaim.aspx

fill out, claim 6 bottles of seasonal, click that you dont have proof

wait for moneys

yw

Advertisement

    #2 Grizzly

    Grizzly
    • <img src ='http://i29.tinypic.com/9iwl5w.jpg'>

    • 3964 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 07:30 PM

    dry.gif wut is this?

    #3 nox

    nox
    • 6707 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 07:32 PM

    airborne falsely advertised their product as a cold/flu relief and have been ordered to pay up to 23m in restitution fees. i bought a pack of the gummies once so i don't feel as bad stealing

    #4 Alex

    Alex
    • 6640 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 07:35 PM

    lol i saw this on forum.bodybuilding.com xD
    didnt do it, just doesnt feel right

    #5 CDXX

    CDXX
    • 42 posts

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 07:44 PM

    That's fucking hilarious! Just about rolled out of my seat laughing when I saw this post. I just did this about 4 days ago. tongue.gif You can also get a 5 dollar settlement from Rockstar Games for their little Hot Chocolate mistake. (Which I will use in April to go towards my new GTA game!) And there is also a settlement with I believe DeBeir's Diamonds. I think you can claim up to $2000 without a receipt and they will give you somewhere around 30% of that price back!

    #6 Amagius

    Amagius
    • 1117 posts

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 07:46 PM

    When I first went to fill it out, I was trying to validate cheating their company with a variety of reasons--until I realized that my mum has bought many packages of it. I acknowledge that she didn't expect them to serve as remedies so much as preventatives, but I feel entirely justified receiving $63.00 now.

    #7 Cataliste

    Cataliste
    • Codex's Right Hand

    • 4662 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 07:48 PM

    This is just wrong....

    #8

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 07:57 PM

    Thanks. smile.gif


    #9 ink

    ink
    • 2189 posts

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 07:57 PM

    QUOTE (Cataliste @ Mar 10 2008, 10:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    This is just wrong....

    Welcome back to 21st century America.

    #10 tastyphoxette

    tastyphoxette
    • Tasty Cakes!

    • 2648 posts

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 07:58 PM

    What should I perhaps say is the date of purchase? or store of purchase?

    #11 Jewbert

    Jewbert
    • 3387 posts

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 07:58 PM

    O.O...

    Mmm yeah. I wouldn't do it. I don't even know what this IS.

    #12

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 07:59 PM

    QUOTE (tastyphoxette @ Mar 10 2008, 09:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    What should I perhaps say is the date of purchase? or store of purchase?

    Some big decent sized chain around you
    [CVS,, walmart, etc etc]

    date around mid 2007

    #13 Sean

    Sean
    • 6188 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 08:00 PM

    Oh lordy.

    #14 ink

    ink
    • 2189 posts

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 08:07 PM

    QUOTE (tastyphoxette @ Mar 10 2008, 10:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    What should I perhaps say is the date of purchase? or store of purchase?

    Only the things with red stars next to them do you have to fill out.

    #15 Alex

    Alex
    • 6640 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 08:07 PM

    Its not stealing per se. They are REQUIRED by the court to pay out 21 million or something like that, for false advertising and falsifying clinical trials for their medicine. I highly doubt that many people even know of the settlement/go online to fill it out. They have to pay that money out in any case.

    #16 ink

    ink
    • 2189 posts

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 08:11 PM

    QUOTE (Alex @ Mar 10 2008, 11:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Its not stealing per se. They are REQUIRED by the court to pay out 21 million or something like that, for false advertising and falsifying clinical trials for their medicine. I highly doubt that many people even know of the settlement/go online to fill it out. They have to pay that money out in any case.

    Pays for my hosting for the next three years and my sister bought their stuff a lot, so I feel cool with it 1we8.gif

    #17 SupermanFTM

    SupermanFTM
    • 5817 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 08:12 PM

    So we might as well get it? tongue.gif

    Still, it seems a little off to me...

    #18 Jewbert

    Jewbert
    • 3387 posts

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 08:12 PM

    QUOTE (Alex @ Mar 10 2008, 08:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Its not stealing per se. They are REQUIRED by the court to pay out 21 million or something like that, for false advertising and falsifying clinical trials for their medicine. I highly doubt that many people even know of the settlement/go online to fill it out. They have to pay that money out in any case.

    Oh is this that shit that I always saw in WalMart talking about a schoolteacher who invented it because they were fed up with getting sick?

    O.O
    Didn't seem like something that would work. 1we8.gif

    #19 Alex

    Alex
    • 6640 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 08:19 PM

    QUOTE (Gooba.Butt @ Mar 10 2008, 08:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Oh is this that shit that I always saw in WalMart talking about a schoolteacher who invented it because they were fed up with getting sick?

    O.O
    Didn't seem like something that would work. 1we8.gif

    yep

    #20 Mr. Hobo

    Mr. Hobo
    • 8152 posts


    Users Awards

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 08:36 PM

    Think Canadians are eligible? tongue.gif

    #21 ink

    ink
    • 2189 posts

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 08:40 PM

    QUOTE (Mr. Hobo @ Mar 10 2008, 11:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Think Canadians are eligible? tongue.gif

    Don't think so 1we8.gif

    #22 Nine

    Nine
    • 472 posts

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 08:41 PM

    Let's hope this isn't some very elaborate scam.

    #23 Jewbert

    Jewbert
    • 3387 posts

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 08:45 PM

    QUOTE (Nine @ Mar 10 2008, 08:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Let's hope this isn't some very elaborate scam.

    Mmm I'm pretty sure it is ok. There's a 47 page settlement document. 1we8.gif

    #24 Nine

    Nine
    • 472 posts

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 08:49 PM

    QUOTE (Gooba.Butt @ Mar 10 2008, 09:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Mmm I'm pretty sure it is ok. There's a 47 page settlement document. 1we8.gif


    << Oh. Well then good.

    #25 ink

    ink
    • 2189 posts

    Posted 10 March 2008 - 08:51 PM

    QUOTE (Nine @ Mar 10 2008, 11:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
    Let's hope this isn't some very elaborate scam.

    Lawsuits would hardcore come pouring in then lol


    1 user(s) are reading this topic

    0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users